Show simple item record

Everolimus Plus Reduced-Exposure CsA versus Mycophenolic Acid Plus Standard-Exposure CsA in Renal-Transplant Recipients

dc.contributor.authorSilva, H. Tedesco Jr.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCibrik, Diane M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnston, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLackova, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMange, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPanis, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWalker, Rowanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWang, Z.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZibari, G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKim, Y. S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-31T17:51:50Z
dc.date.available2011-08-02T18:19:14Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationSilva, H. Tedesco Jr.; Cibrik, D.; Johnston, T.; Lackova, E.; Mange, K.; Panis, C.; Walker, R.; Wang, Z.; Zibari, G.; Kim, Y. S.; (2010). "Everolimus Plus Reduced-Exposure CsA versus Mycophenolic Acid Plus Standard-Exposure CsA in Renal-Transplant Recipients." American Journal of Transplantation 10(6): 1401-1413. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79307>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79307
dc.description.abstractEverolimus allows calcineurin-inhibitor reduction without loss of efficacy and may improve renal-transplant outcomes. In a 24-month, open-label study, 833 de novo renal-transplant recipients were randomized to everolimus 1.5 or 3.0 mg/day (target troughs 3–8 and 6–12 ng/mL, respectively) with reduced-exposure CsA, or mycophenolic acid (MPA) 1.44 g/day plus standard-exposure CsA. Patients received basiliximab ± corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was composite efficacy failure (treated biopsy-proven acute rejection, graft loss, death or loss to follow-up) and the main safety endpoint was renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD]) at Month 12 (last-observation-carried-forward analyses). Month 12 efficacy failure rates were noninferior in the everolimus 1.5 mg (25.3%) and 3.0 mg (21.9%) versus MPA (24.2%) groups. Mean eGFR at Month 12 was noninferior in the everolimus groups versus the MPA group (54.6 and 51.3 vs 52.2 mL/min/1.73 m 2 in the everolimus 1.5 mg, 3.0 mg and MPA groups, respectively; 95% confidence intervals for everolimus 1.5 mg and 3.0 mg vs MPA: −1.7, 6.4 and −5.0, 3.2, respectively). The overall incidence of adverse events was comparable between groups. The use of everolimus with progressive reduction in CsA exposure, up to 60% at 1 year, resulted in similar efficacy and renal function compared with standard-exposure CsA plus MPA.en_US
dc.format.extent460218 bytes
dc.format.extent3106 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.subject.otherCalcineurin Inhibitor Toxicityen_US
dc.subject.otherCyclosporineen_US
dc.subject.otherEverolimusen_US
dc.subject.otherRenal Functionen_US
dc.subject.otherRenal Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherTherapeutic Drug Monitoringen_US
dc.titleEverolimus Plus Reduced-Exposure CsA versus Mycophenolic Acid Plus Standard-Exposure CsA in Renal-Transplant Recipientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHospital do Rim e Hipertensão, São Paulo, Brazilen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Kentucky, Lexington, KYen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNSP F.D. Roosevelta, Banska Bystrica, Slovak Republicen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLouisiana State Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherYonsei University College of Medicine Severance Hospital, Seoul, Koreaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20455882en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79307/1/j.1600-6143.2010.03129.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03129.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.