Show simple item record

Automatic Atrial Threshold Measurement and Adjustment in Pediatric Patients

dc.contributor.authorHiippala, Anitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSerwer, Gerald A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorClausson, Evaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavenport, Lynnen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrand, Trinaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHapponen, Juha-Mattien_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-31T17:54:02Z
dc.date.available2011-05-04T18:52:57Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationHiippala, Anita; Serwer, Gerald A.; Clausson, Eva; Davenport, Lynn; Brand, Trina; Happonen, Juha-Matti; (2010). "Automatic Atrial Threshold Measurement and Adjustment in Pediatric Patients." Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 33(3): 309-313. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79326>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0147-8389en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-8159en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79326
dc.description.abstractBackground: Automatic threshold measurement and output adjustment are used as default settings in modern pacemakers. The purpose of the study was to assess Atrial Capture Management (ACM) of Medtronic pacemakers in pediatric patients. Methods: Forty children were enrolled in two centers. Median age was 9.8 years (range 0.8–17.5 years). Half had undergone surgery for congenital heart defects; 45% of patients had an epicardial atrial lead. The pacing indication was atrioventricular block in 82% of patients and sinus node disease in 18%. Manually determined atrial thresholds and ACM measurements were compared. Results: ACM measurements were within the expected variation in 37/40 (93%) of the patients. In one patient the threshold was 0.625-V lower manually than with ACM. One patient had too high an intrinsic atrial rate for ACM to be able to measure threshold. The mean threshold at 0.4 ms was 0.69 ± 0.32 V manually and 0.68 ± 0.35 V with ACM (two-tailed paired t- test, P = 0.52) in all patients. The mean difference was 0.012 V (95% confidence interval: −0.027, 0.053). The mean endocardial threshold was 0.70 ± 0.36 V manually and 0.69 ± 0.38 V with ACM; epicardial threshold was 0.67 ± 0.27 V manually and 0.68 ± 0.32 V with ACM. The difference between the measurements was 0.012 V for endocardial and 0.014 V for epicardial leads. No atrial arrhythmias due to ACM measurements were observed. Conclusions: ACM measures atrial thresholds reliably in pediatric patients with both endocardial and epicardial leads, allowing its use in both. Constant high intrinsic atrial rate may prevent automatic threshold measurement in young children. (PACE 2010; 33:309–313)en_US
dc.format.extent84625 bytes
dc.format.extent3106 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.subject.otherAtrial Thresholden_US
dc.subject.otherACMen_US
dc.subject.otherChildrenen_US
dc.subject.otherEpicardialen_US
dc.titleAutomatic Atrial Threshold Measurement and Adjustment in Pediatric Patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhysiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Congenital Heart Center, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPediatric Cardiology, Hospital for Children and Adolescents, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finlanden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMedtronic AB, Kista, Swedenen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMedtronic Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesotaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid19954505en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79326/1/j.1540-8159.2009.02619.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02619.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourcePacing and Clinical Electrophysiologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.