Show simple item record

The Attentional Function Index—a self-report cognitive measure

dc.contributor.authorCimprich, Bernadineen_US
dc.contributor.authorVisovatti, Moiraen_US
dc.contributor.authorRonis, David L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-02T17:59:20Z
dc.date.available2012-03-05T15:30:01Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-02en_US
dc.identifier.citationCimprich, Bernadine; Visovatti, Moira; Ronis, David L. (2011). "The Attentional Function Index—a self-report cognitive measure." Psycho-Oncology 20(2): 194-202. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79422>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1057-9249en_US
dc.identifier.issn1099-1611en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/79422
dc.description.abstractObjective : Cognitive assessment in individuals with cancer requires both measured performance on neuropsychological tests and self-report of effectiveness in functioning. Few instruments are available to assess the perceived impact of cognitive alterations on daily functioning in individuals treated for cancer. In this study, we investigated the psychometric properties of a theoretically based instrument, and the Attentional Function Index (AFI), designed to measure perceived effectiveness in common activities requiring attention and working memory, particularly the ability to formulate plans, carry out tasks, and function effectively in daily life. Methods : Women ( N =172), ages 27–86 years, completed the questionnaire before primary treatment for early stage breast cancer. Construct validity was established using exploratory principal component factor analysis with varimax rotation. Results : A 13-item instrument emerged with 3 subscales, namely effective action, attentional lapses, and interpersonal effectiveness, which explained 74.69% of total variance. The internal consistency coefficients (Cronbach's α ) were 0.92 for the total instrument, and ranged from 0.80 to 0.92 for the 3 subscales. Further examination of validity indicated that the scores on the AFI (1) showed expected correlations with established measures of ability to concentrate, cognitive failures, states of confusion, and mental fatigue, and (2) could distinguish differences in perceived cognitive functioning between younger and older age groups. AFI scores were not significantly associated with years of education or presence of comorbid conditions. Conclusion : The brief AFI has demonstrated usefulness for assessment of perceived cognitive functioning in populations with life-threatening and chronic illness, such as breast cancer. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.format.extent152360 bytes
dc.format.extent3118 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherCancer Research, Oncology and Pathologyen_US
dc.titleThe Attentional Function Index—a self-report cognitive measureen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA ; School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA ; Department of Veterans Affairs, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid20213858en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/79422/1/1729_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pon.1729en_US
dc.identifier.sourcePsycho-Oncologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.