A Derivation of the Speed of Light Postulate
dc.contributor.author | Nikkhah Shirazi, Armin | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-02-18T17:31:10Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-02-18T17:31:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-02-18T17:31:10Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2008-11-28 | |
dc.identifier.citation | http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/329 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83152> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83152 | |
dc.description | updated version of original submission to 1st FQXi essay contest which corrects some minor oversights in original article | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The speed of light postulate, one of the two fundamental assumptions upon which the special theory of relativity (SR) is based, still seems as mysterious today as when it was first introduced. This paper presents a derivation of the postulate from three axioms:1) A definition of motion in proper time that captures most of the mathematical aspects of SR except for the speed of light postulate itself, 2) An axiom concerning the nature of the existence of entities which do not age, and finally 3) an axiom which defines existence in a spacetime to be transitive. The second axiom is motivated by an apparent paradox inherent in the structure of SR, called the existence paradox, pertaining to entities which do not age. The duration of existence of such entities in their proper frame is precisely equal to zero, which would normally be interpreted to be consistent with non- existence and inconsistent with the empirical evidence for the existence of such entities. The resolution of this apparent paradox is guided by a quasi-philosophical principle, called the Principle of least Speciality. The second axiom presents a resolution to the existence paradox that follows this principle while at the same time providing the essence of the explanation for the speed of light postulate. Given the three axioms, it is straightforward to show that the speed of light postulate is a logical consequence. Furthermore, this framework implies a direct experimentally testable prediction that is, according to currently prevailing views, unexpected. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Special Relativity | en_US |
dc.subject | Speed of Light Postulate | en_US |
dc.subject | Speed of Light Invariance | en_US |
dc.subject | Motion in Proper Time | en_US |
dc.subject | Aging | en_US |
dc.subject | Existence Paradox | en_US |
dc.subject | Principle of Least Speciality | en_US |
dc.title | A Derivation of the Speed of Light Postulate | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Physics | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Physics, Department of | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/83152/1/A_Derivation_of_the_Speed_of_Light_Postulate.pdf | |
dc.identifier.source | FQXi | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Physics, Department of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.