Show simple item record

Detection and management of latent tuberculosis in liver transplant patients

dc.contributor.authorJafri, Syed-Mohammeden_US
dc.contributor.authorSingal, Amit G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKaul, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorFontana, Robert Johnen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-10T16:02:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-10T16:02:44Z
dc.date.available2012-04-30T18:27:21Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationJafri, Syed-Mohammed; Singal, Amit G.; Kaul, Daniel; Fontana, Robert John (2011). "Detection and management of latent tuberculosis in liver transplant patients." Liver Transplantation 17(3): 306-314. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83174>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6465en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6473en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83174
dc.description.abstractThe optimal means for detecting and managing liver transplantation (LT) patients with latent tuberculosis (TB) are not well defined. Our study aims were to (1) determine the frequency and risk factors of latent TB in a large cohort of consecutive adult LT candidates and (2) determine the safety and efficacy of isoniazid treatment in LT recipients with latent TB. A review of patients assessed for latent TB by skin testing using purified protein derivative (PPD; January 2004 to September 2008) or with the interferon-γ release assay QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT; March 2008 to October 2009) was undertaken. The baseline clinical features and outcomes of subjects with latent TB and subjects without latent TB were compared. Twenty-five of 420 subjects (6.0%) were positive for PPD. In comparison, 11 of 119 subjects (9.2%) had a positive QFT assay, and 15 others (13%) had indeterminate results. Both PPD-positive and QFT-positive subjects were less likely to be Caucasian than subjects without latent TB ( p < 0.001). The 3-year survival rate of the 25 LT recipients with latent TB was similar to that of the 296 LT recipients without latent TB (78.7% versus 74.6%, P = 0.58). Fifteen of the 25 latent TB patients received isoniazid at a mean of 0.67 months after LT. Although isoniazid was discontinued in 8 subjects because of possible side effects, none of the 25 latent TB patients developed TB reactivation after transplantation with a mean follow-up of 33 months. In conclusion, both QFT testing and PPD testing demonstrate similar rates of detecting latent TB infection in American LT candidates, but QFT testing also leads to a moderate rate of indeterminate test results. Early isoniazid chemoprophylaxis after LT is poorly tolerated and is frequently discontinued. Liver Transpl, 2011. © 2011 AASLD.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherSurgeryen_US
dc.titleDetection and management of latent tuberculosis in liver transplant patientsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI ; Telephone: 734-936-4780; FAX: 734-936-7392 ; Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, 3912 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0362en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21384513en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/83174/1/22203_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lt.22203en_US
dc.identifier.sourceLiver Transplantationen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.