Show simple item record

Collaborative Design and Implementation of a Multisite Community Coalition Evaluation

dc.contributor.authorLachance, Laurie L.
dc.contributor.authorHoule, CR
dc.contributor.authorCassidy, EF
dc.contributor.authorBourcier, E
dc.contributor.authorCohn, Jennifer H.
dc.contributor.authorOrians, CE
dc.contributor.authorCoughey, K
dc.contributor.authorGeng, X
dc.contributor.authorJoseph, CLM
dc.contributor.authorLyde, MD
dc.contributor.authorDoctor, LJ
dc.contributor.authorClark, Noreen M.
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-15T20:36:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-15T20:36:24Z
dc.date.available2011-03-15T20:36:24Zen_US
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationHealth Promotion Practice Supplement to April 2006 Vol. 7, No. 2, 44S-55S <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83257>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83257
dc.description.abstractEvaluation designs assessing community coalitions must balance measures of how coalitions do their work and evidence that the coalitions are making a difference. The Allies cross-site evaluation attempts to determine the combined effects of the seven coalitions’ work at the individual, organizational, and community levels. Principal components considered are (a) contextual factors of the coalition community, (b) coalition processes and structure, (c) planning and planning products, (d) implementation actions, (e) activities and collaborations, (f) anticipated intermediate outcomes, and (g) expected asthma related health outcomes. Measurements are quantitative and qualitative, and data generated by these methods are used as ends in themselves and as a way to confirm or inform other measures. Evaluation has been an integral part of the planning and implementation phases of the Allies coalition work, with a priority of involving all of the partners in conceiving of and deciding upon the elements of assessment.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.subjectCoalitionsen_US
dc.subjectAsthmaen_US
dc.subjectEvaluation Designen_US
dc.subjectMulti-site Evaluationen_US
dc.titleCollaborative Design and Implementation of a Multisite Community Coalition Evaluationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Managing Chronic Diseaseen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRobert Wood Johnson Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGroup Health Community Foundation, Seattleen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Pediatrics at the Medical College of Wisconsinen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBattelle Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluationen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPhiladelphia Health Management Corporationen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHenry Ford Health System, Detroiten_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCalifornia State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherW.K. Kellogg Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid16636155
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/83257/1/08 Lachance et al. HPP 7.2 44S-55S.pdf
dc.identifier.sourceHealth Promotion Practiceen_US
dc.owningcollnamePublic Health, School of (SPH)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.