Show simple item record

Chloroplast DNA microsatellites reveal contrasting phylogeographic structure in mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King, Meliaceae) from Amazonia and Central America

dc.contributor.authorLemes, Maristerra R.
dc.contributor.authorDick, Christopher W.
dc.contributor.authorNavarro, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorLowe, Andrew J.
dc.contributor.authorCavers, Stephen P.
dc.contributor.authorGribel, Rogerio
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-19T14:46:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-19T14:46:26Z
dc.date.available2011-03-19T14:46:26Zen_US
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.citationLemes, M.R., C. W. Dick, C. Navarro, A. J. Lowe, S. Cavers, R. Gribel (2010) Chloroplast DNA microsatellites reveal contrasting phylogeographic structure in mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King, Meliaceae) from Amazonia and Central America. Tropical Plant Biology 3 (1):40-49. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83291>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83291
dc.description.abstractBig-leaf mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King) is one of the most valuable and overharvested timber trees of tropical America. In order to better characterize geographic patterns of genetic variation, we performed a phylogeographic analysis of S. macrophylla based on six polymorphic chloroplast genome simple sequence repeat loci (cpSSRs) analyzed in 16 populations (N=245 individuals) distributed across Central America and the Brazilian Amazon. Of the 31 total cpDNA haplotypes identified, 16 occurred in Central America and 15 in Amazonia with no single haplotype shared between the two regions. Populations from Central America showed moderate differentiation (FST=0.36) while within population genetic diversity was generally high (mean Nei’s HE=0.639). In contrast, the Amazonian populations were strongly differentiated (FST= 0.91) and contained relatively low genetic diversity (mean HE=0.176), except for one highly diverse population (HE= 0.925) from eastern Amazonia. Spatial analysis of molecular variance (SAMOVA) identified a single Central American phylogroup and four Amazonian phylogroups, indicating stronger phylogeographic structure within Amazonia. The results demonstrate distinctive regional patterns of S. macrophylla differentiation, and the first evidence of a strong phylogeographic break between Central American and South American mahogany populations. We suggest that the frequent occurrence of hurricanes in Central America, the differences in the glacial histories and in the duration and intensity of anthropogenic disturbance during the late Holocene may have played important roles in the geographic structuring of cpDNA lineages in the two regions. The high private haplotype diversity in Brazilian populations suggests that cpSSRs can be used as DNA barcodes for regional timber certification.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.subjectPhylogeographyen_US
dc.subjectMahoganyen_US
dc.titleChloroplast DNA microsatellites reveal contrasting phylogeographic structure in mahogany (Swietenia macrophylla King, Meliaceae) from Amazonia and Central Americaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumEcology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of (EEB)en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSmithsonian Tropical Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherInstitute for Amazon Studies (INPA), Brazilen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.identifier.pmid1275579en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/83291/1/Lemes2010TrPB.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12042-010-9042-5
dc.identifier.sourceTropical Plant Biologyen_US
dc.owningcollnameEcology and Evolutionary Biology, Department of (EEB)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.