The Riverside and Berwyn experience: Contrasts in landscape structure, perceptions of the urban landscape, and their effects on people
Crow, Thomas; Brown, Terry; De Young, Raymond
2006
View/ Open
Crow,_T.,_T._Brown_&_R._De_Young_(2006)_The_Riverside_and_Berwyn_experience,_LUP,_75,_282–299.pdf
Main article
(1.2MB
PDF)Main article
Citation
Crow, Tom, Terry Brown & Raymond De Young (2006), "The Riverside and Berwyn experience: Contrasts in landscape structure, perceptions of the urban landscape, and their effects on people." Landscape and Urban Planning, 75, 282-299 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83539>
Abstract
Humans not only structure the landscape through their activities, but their perceptions of nature are affected by the spatial and temporal arrangements (structure) in the landscape. Our understanding of these interactions, however, is limited. We explored the relationship between landscape structure and peoples’ perceptions of nature in the Chicago, IL, USA, suburbs of Riverside and Berwyn because they offer contrasting paradigms of an urban landscape. Designed in the 1800s by Frederick Law Olmsted, Riverside has several unique design elements (curvilinear streets, ample setbacks, parkways of variable width with mowed grass and naturalistic groupings of trees) that define the structure and composition of this landscape. The urban forestwas the keystone of Olmsted’s desire to create a harmonious community characterized by “refined sylvan beauty”. In contrast, the adjacent community of Berwyn has right-angled streets with small lots and narrow setbacks for houses. Differences in landscape structure between the two communities produced differences in the diversity, size, and composition of woody vegetation. As measured by patch-size distribution, Riverside had greater diversity in landscape structure than Berwyn, and in turn, Riverside had greater diversity in the composition and size of the woody vegetation compared to Berwyn. Riverside tended toward a “natural” appearance with vegetation, while yards in Berwyn tended to be trimmed and edged. Significant differences between the mean ratings of Riverside and Berwyn respondents were found for six of seven community attribute categories. Riverside participants reported receiving greater benefit from the visual and nature-related features of the urban forest than did Berwyn respondents. Berwyn residents ranked social atmosphere for the community and locomotion (wayfinding) highest among the seven community attribute categories. Despite differences between the two communities, residents valued the green residential environment provided by vegetation. However, the more diverse urban landscape as measured by built structures, woody vegetation, and lot size and shape proved to be more satisfying to the residents of these two communities. The design concepts developed and implemented by Olmsted more than century ago in Riverside are still relevant to city planners striving to develop living environments that are satisfying to urban and suburban residents.Publisher
Elsevier B. V.
Other DOIs
Subjects
Chicago Natural Capital Urban Landscapes Trees Landscape Design Frederick Law Olmsted Environmental Psychology Sustainability Coupled Natural and Human Systems Nearby Nature Urban Forest Urban Nature
Description
Published online: July 6, 2005
Types
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordRemediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.