Show simple item record

Content validation of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) framework in women with urinary incontinence

dc.contributor.authorSung, Vivian W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Felishaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRogers, Rebecca R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, David A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Deborah L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, Melissa A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-06T15:38:33Z
dc.date.available2012-05-14T20:40:07Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationSung, Vivian W.; Marques, Felisha; Rogers, Rebecca R.; Williams, David A.; Myers, Deborah L.; Clark, Melissa A. (2011). "Content validation of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) framework in women with urinary incontinence." Neurourology and Urodynamics 30(4): 503-509. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83737>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-2467en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6777en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/83737
dc.description.abstractAims To assess whether the existing National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) conceptual framework and item banks sufficiently capture the concerns of women with urinary incontinence (UI). Methods Thirty-five women with UI were recruited between February-April 2009 for 4 structured focus groups to develop and assess the content validity of a conceptual framework for the impact of UI. This framework included domains from the NIH PROMIS framework and item banks including broad domains of physical and social function and mental health. All sessions were transcribed, coded, and qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed using analytic induction and deductive analysis to identify new themes and domains relevant to women with UI. Results The focus groups provided information that confirmed the relevance of existing PROMIS domains and identified new outcome domains that are important to this patient population. The groups confirmed the relevance of the physical and social functioning, and mental health domains. Additional themes that emerged included the distinction between ability versus participation and satisfaction, role functioning, external mediators, re-calibration/coping, cognitive function and new possibilities. Participants also felt strongly that not all domains and items apply to all women with UI and an option to tailor questionnaires and skip non-relevant items was important. Conclusions The PROMIS framework domains are relevant to women with UI, but additional patient-important themes are identified that may improve the comprehensiveness of this assessment framework for measuring outcomes important to women with UI. These results will inform future item content development for UI. 30:503–509, 2011. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherLife and Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherMiscellaneous Medicalen_US
dc.titleContent validation of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) framework in women with urinary incontinenceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialtiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartments of Anesthesiology, Medicine, Psychiatry and Psychology, Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, ; Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Women and Infants' Hospital/Warren Alpert Medical School at Brown University, 695 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island,en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartments of Community Health and Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island,en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21400574en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/83737/1/21048_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/nau.21048en_US
dc.identifier.sourceNeurourology and Urodynamicsen_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.