Show simple item record

Predictors of hospital mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with acute lung injury

dc.contributor.authorCooke, Colin
dc.contributor.authorKahn, Jeremy M.
dc.contributor.authorCaldwell, Ellen
dc.contributor.authorOkamoto, Valdelis
dc.contributor.authorHeckbert, Susan
dc.contributor.authorHudson, Leonard
dc.contributor.authorRubenfeld, Gordon
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-24T05:56:41Z
dc.date.available2011-05-24T05:56:41Z
dc.date.issued2008-05
dc.identifier.citationCritical Care Medicine May 2008 - Volume 36 - Issue 5 - pp 1412-1420 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84156>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84156
dc.description.abstractObjective: Studies describing predictors of mortality in patients with acute lung injury were primarily derived from selected academic centers. We sought to determine the predictors of mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with acute lung injury and to characterize the performance of current severity of illness scores in this population. Design: Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter, population-based cohort. Setting: Twenty-one hospitals in Washington State. Patients: The cohort included 1,113 patients with acute lung injury identified during the year 1999–2000. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: We evaluated physiology, comorbidities, risk factors for acute lung injury, and other variables for their association with death at hospital discharge. Bivariate predictors of death were entered into a multiple logistic regression model. We compared Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, APACHE III, and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II to the multivariable model using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The model was validated in an independent cohort of 886 patients with acute lung injury. Modified acute physiology score, age, comorbidities, arterial pH, minute ventilation, Paco2, Pao2/Fio2 ratio, intensive care unit admission source, and intensive care unit days before onset of acute lung injury were independently predictive of in-hospital death (p < .05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the multivariable model was superior to that of APACHE III (.81 vs. .77, p < .001) but was no different after external validation (.71 vs. .70, p = .64). Conclusions: The predictors of mortality in patients with acute lung injury are similar to those predictive of mortality in the general intensive care unit population, indicating disease heterogeneity within this cohort. Accordingly, APACHE III predicts mortality in acute lung injury as well as a model using variables selected specifically for patients with acute lung injury.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIH SCOR HL30542, 2R01HL67939, and T32HL007287 from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD); and by the CHEST Foundation & Ortho Biotech Clinical Affairs, LLC Clin- ical Research Trainee Award in Critical Care, North- brook, Illinois.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSociety of Critical Care Medicine & Lippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.subjectALIen_US
dc.subjectARDSen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectPrognosisen_US
dc.titlePredictors of hospital mortality in a population-based cohort of patients with acute lung injuryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialities
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumPulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Division ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumInternal Medicine, Department ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/84156/1/Cooke - Predictors of mortality in ALI.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/CCM.0b013e318170a375
dc.identifier.sourceCritical Care Medicineen_US
dc.owningcollnamePulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Division of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.