Show simple item record

Estimates of bottom flows and bottom boundary layer dissipation of the oceanic general circulation from global high-resolution models

dc.contributor.authorArbic, Brian K.
dc.contributor.authorShriver, Jay
dc.contributor.authorHogan, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorHurlburt, Harley
dc.contributor.authorMcClean, Julie
dc.contributor.authorMetzger, E. Joseph
dc.contributor.authorScott, Robert
dc.contributor.authorSen, Ayon
dc.contributor.authorSmedstad, Ole Martin
dc.contributor.authorWallcraft, Alan
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-31T16:08:51Z
dc.date.available2011-05-31T16:08:51Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationArbic, B. K., J. F. Shriver, P. J. Hogan, H. E. Hurlburt, J. L. McClean, E. J. Metzger, R. B. Scott, A. Sen, O. M. Smedstad, and A. J. Wallcraft (2009), Estimates of bottom flows and bottom boundary layer dissipation of the oceanic general circulation from global high-resolution models, J. Geophys. Res., 114, C02024, doi:10.1029/2008JC005072. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84347>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84347
dc.description.abstractThis paper (1) compares the bottom flows of three existing high-resolution global simulations of the oceanic general circulation to near-bottom flows in a current meter database and (2) estimates, from the simulations, the global energy dissipation rate of the general circulation by quadratic bottom boundary layer drag. The study utilizes a data-assimilative run of the Naval Research Laboratory Layered Ocean Model (NLOM), a nonassimilative run of NLOM, and a nonassimilative run of the Parallel Ocean Program z-level ocean model. Generally speaking, the simulations have some difficulty matching the flows in individual current meter records. However, averages of model values of jubj3 (the time average of the cube of bottom velocity, which is proportional to the dissipation rate) computed over all the current meter sites agree to within a factor of 2.7 or better with averages computed from the current meters, at least in certain depth ranges. The models therefore likely provide reasonable order-of-magnitude estimates of areally integrated dissipation by bottom drag. Global dissipation rates range from 0.14 to 0.65 TW, suggesting that bottom drag represents a substantial sink of the 1 TW wind-power transformed into geostrophic motions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.titleEstimates of bottom flows and bottom boundary layer dissipation of the oceanic general circulation from global high-resolution modelsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeological Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumGeological Sciences, Department ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/84347/1/jgr_quaddissfrommodels.pdf
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Geophysical Researchen_US
dc.owningcollnameEarth and Environmental Sciences, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.