On Quadratic Bottom Drag, Geostrophic Turbulence, and Oceanic Mesoscale Eddies
dc.contributor.author | Arbic, Brian K. | |
dc.contributor.author | Robert, Scott | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-06-01T17:40:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-06-01T17:40:37Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Arbic, B.K., and R.B. Scott, 2008: On Quadratic Bottom Drag, Geostrophic Turbulence, and Oceanic Mesoscale Eddies, Journal of Physical Oceanography 38, 84-103 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84366> | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84366 | |
dc.description.abstract | Many investigators have idealized the oceanic mesoscale eddy field with numerical simulations of geostrophic turbulence forced by a horizontally homogeneous, baroclinically unstable mean flow. To date such studies have employed linear bottom Ekman friction (hereinafter, linear drag). This paper presents simulations of two-layer baroclinically unstable geostrophic turbulence damped by quadratic bottom drag, which is generally thought to be more realistic. The goals of the paper are 1) to describe the behavior of quadratically damped turbulence as drag strength changes, using previously reported behaviors of linearly damped turbulence as a point of comparison, and 2) to compare the eddy energies, baroclinicities, and horizontal scales in both quadratic and linear drag simulations with observations and to discuss the constraints these comparisons place on the form and strength of bottom drag in the ocean. In both quadratic and linear drag simulations, large barotropic eddies develop with weak damping, large equivalent barotropic eddies develop with strong damping, and the comparison in goal 2 above is closest when the nondimensional friction strength parameter is of order 1. Typical values of the quadratic drag coefficient (cd about 0.0025) and of boundary layer depths (Hb about 50 m) imply that the quadratic friction strength parameter cdLd /Hb , where Ld is the deformation radius, may indeed be of order 1 in the ocean. Model eddies are realistic over a wider range of friction strengths when drag is quadratic, because of a reduced sensitivity to friction strength in that case. The quadratic parameter is independent of the mean shear, in contrast to the linear parameter. Plots of eddy length scales, computed from satellite altimeter data, versus mean shear and versus rough estimates of the friction strength parameters suggest that both linear and quadratic bottom drag may be active in the ocean. Topographic wave drag contains terms that are linear in the bottom flow, thus providing some justification for the use of linear bottom drag in models. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | American Meteorological Society | en_US |
dc.title | On Quadratic Bottom Drag, Geostrophic Turbulence, and Oceanic Mesoscale Eddies | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Geological Sciences | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Geological Sciences, Department of | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/84366/1/jpo_quaddrag.pdf | |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Physical Oceanography | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Earth and Environmental Sciences, Department of |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.