Show simple item record

On Quadratic Bottom Drag, Geostrophic Turbulence, and Oceanic Mesoscale Eddies

dc.contributor.authorArbic, Brian K.
dc.contributor.authorRobert, Scott
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-01T17:40:37Z
dc.date.available2011-06-01T17:40:37Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationArbic, B.K., and R.B. Scott, 2008: On Quadratic Bottom Drag, Geostrophic Turbulence, and Oceanic Mesoscale Eddies, Journal of Physical Oceanography 38, 84-103 <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84366>en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84366
dc.description.abstractMany investigators have idealized the oceanic mesoscale eddy field with numerical simulations of geostrophic turbulence forced by a horizontally homogeneous, baroclinically unstable mean flow. To date such studies have employed linear bottom Ekman friction (hereinafter, linear drag). This paper presents simulations of two-layer baroclinically unstable geostrophic turbulence damped by quadratic bottom drag, which is generally thought to be more realistic. The goals of the paper are 1) to describe the behavior of quadratically damped turbulence as drag strength changes, using previously reported behaviors of linearly damped turbulence as a point of comparison, and 2) to compare the eddy energies, baroclinicities, and horizontal scales in both quadratic and linear drag simulations with observations and to discuss the constraints these comparisons place on the form and strength of bottom drag in the ocean. In both quadratic and linear drag simulations, large barotropic eddies develop with weak damping, large equivalent barotropic eddies develop with strong damping, and the comparison in goal 2 above is closest when the nondimensional friction strength parameter is of order 1. Typical values of the quadratic drag coefficient (cd about 0.0025) and of boundary layer depths (Hb about 50 m) imply that the quadratic friction strength parameter cdLd /Hb , where Ld is the deformation radius, may indeed be of order 1 in the ocean. Model eddies are realistic over a wider range of friction strengths when drag is quadratic, because of a reduced sensitivity to friction strength in that case. The quadratic parameter is independent of the mean shear, in contrast to the linear parameter. Plots of eddy length scales, computed from satellite altimeter data, versus mean shear and versus rough estimates of the friction strength parameters suggest that both linear and quadratic bottom drag may be active in the ocean. Topographic wave drag contains terms that are linear in the bottom flow, thus providing some justification for the use of linear bottom drag in models.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Meteorological Societyen_US
dc.titleOn Quadratic Bottom Drag, Geostrophic Turbulence, and Oceanic Mesoscale Eddiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeological Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumGeological Sciences, Department ofen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/84366/1/jpo_quaddrag.pdf
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Physical Oceanographyen_US
dc.owningcollnameEarth and Environmental Sciences, Department of


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.