Show simple item record

Engineering the Quantitative PCR Assay for Decreased Cost and Complexity.

dc.contributor.authorBoggy, Gregory J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-10T18:24:23Z
dc.date.available2011-06-10T18:24:23Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/84653
dc.description.abstractThe quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is an assay of target nucleic acid concentration. Clinical applications of quantitative PCR include measurement of HIV viral load, measurement of bacterial infection, and cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Widespread usage of qPCR, however, is restricted by limited experimental throughput, assay-to-assay variability, and methods of interpreting data that are either cumbersome or lack robustness. This thesis introduces two advances that simplify both the analysis and design of qPCR assays. The first advance, a two parameter mass action kinetic model of PCR (MAK2) was developed for fitting qPCR data in order to quantify target concentration using a single qPCR assay. MAK2-fitting was experimentally validated on three independently generated qPCR datasets and found to quantify data as accurately as the gold-standard method, quantification cycle (Cq) standard curve quantification. The second advance presented, multiplex-MAK2 analysis of monochrome multiplex qPCR (MMQPCR) data, was developed for automated quantification of both targets in duplex qPCR assays without target-specific DNA probes. The MMQPCR assay and multiplex-MAK2-fitting were tested experimentally on a two-dimensional dilution series with known amounts of two synthetic DNA targets. Results indicate that the two-target MMQPCR assay can accurately measure both targets when the target concentration ratio is at least 10:1, and that multiplex-MAK2 quantifies data with similar accuracy to quantification by Cq standard curve. Results obtained from experimental validation using two genetic DNA targets from a microbial coculture further support these conclusions. The results of these experiments suggest that duplex qPCR assays can be performed that are as simple, inexpensive, and accurate as monoplex qPCR assays, yet provide twice as much information. Overall, this work demonstrates the benefits of using biophysics-based qPCR methods. This thesis first provides an overview of the biophysical framework from which current qPCR methods are analyzed. Next, there is an in depth discussion of the analysis methods currently used to analyze qPCR data. The MAK2 model is then derived from first principles and experimentally validated. Multiplex-MAK2-fitting of qPCR data is described and experimentally validated. The thesis concludes with applications of the developed technologies and possible directions for further development of biophysics-based qPCR methods.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMathematical Model of PCR and Applicationsen_US
dc.titleEngineering the Quantitative PCR Assay for Decreased Cost and Complexity.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLin, Ninaen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWoolf, Peter Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLinderman, Jennifer J.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberLubensky, David K.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiological Chemistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/84653/1/gboggy_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.