We can’t get no satisfaction!: The relationship between students’ ethical reasoning and their satisfaction with engineering ethics education
dc.contributor.author | Holsapple, Matthew | |
dc.contributor.author | Sutus, Janel | |
dc.contributor.author | Carpenter, Donald D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Finelli, Cynthia J. | |
dc.contributor.author | Burt, Brian A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ra, Eunjong | |
dc.contributor.author | Harding, Trevor S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Bielby, Robert | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-08-26T19:57:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2011-08-26T19:57:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011-06 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86096 | |
dc.description.abstract | Student satisfaction is a common metric for evaluating classes and other educational programs, and sometimes that satisfaction is seen as a proxy for effectiveness of those programs. For this paper, we examine student satisfaction within the context of engineering ethics education, examining the relationship between student satisfaction and ethical reasoning ability. As part of a national study of ethics education, we draw on survey data from 3,914 undergraduate engineering students, and results suggest that higher levels of ethical reasoning actually predict lower levels of satisfaction with ethics education. Further, the amount of ethics education and the methods through which it is taught also affect students’ levels of satisfaction. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Science Foundation | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | Education | en_US |
dc.subject | Engineering Education | en_US |
dc.subject | Ethics | en_US |
dc.subject | Satisfaction | en_US |
dc.subject | Moral Judgment | en_US |
dc.title | We can’t get no satisfaction!: The relationship between students’ ethical reasoning and their satisfaction with engineering ethics education | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Education | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Center for Research on Teaching and Learning | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | College of Engineering | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Education | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Carnegie Mellon University | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | California Polytechnic State University | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Lawrence Technological University | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86096/1/E3_ASEE_Satisfaction_2011.pdf | |
dc.identifier.source | American Society for Engineering Education | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.