Show simple item record

"I Could Make a Difference" Research and Theory on Fostering Adolescents' Political Efficacy and Engagement.

dc.contributor.authorLevy, Brett Milleren_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-15T17:10:10Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2011-09-15T17:10:10Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86312
dc.description.abstractIn democratic societies, many adult citizens choose not to participate in political processes. To address this problem, this dissertation explores and examines how educators can foster adolescents’ political efficacy, one of the strongest predictors of political participation. Prior research indicates that political efficacy, the belief that individuals’ action can influence governmental processes, increases when individuals have opportunities to (1) discuss public issues, (2) participate in small-scale democratic processes, and (3) develop connections with others who are politically engaged. However, this earlier research does not explain why or how these experiences support the development of political efficacy. Through three mixed methods empirical studies, this dissertation begins to fill this research gap. First, I examined two educational programs – a Model United Nations club and a course on civic advocacy – in which students had the three types of aforementioned experiences. In Model UN, students attended conferences where they represented different countries, debated those nations’ positions on a wide range of topics (such as security treaties), and developed solutions to major international challenges. The advocacy class, on the other hand, required students to select and research community-based problems or institutions, develop plans to influence relevant policymakers, and advocate for change through various means. To examine the implementation and outcomes of these programs, I gathered data during one semester through observations, interviews, surveys, and student papers. Findings indicated that both programs had a positive impact on students’ political efficacy and that crucial to this growth was adult leaders’ support of students’ political knowledge (e.g., political processes and issues), political skills (e.g., communication), and political goal achievement. The third empirical study sought to identify the broad set of factors that influence adolescents’ political efficacy. By analyzing interview data from the two classroom-based studies and survey data from 142 undergraduate students, I found evidence to support a robust model that includes a wide variety of factors that contribute to political efficacy, such as political interest and political trust. Based on this theoretical model and the program-based studies, I provide practical recommendations to educators and researchers interested in preparing students for active political participation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCivic Engagementen_US
dc.subjectPolitical Efficacyen_US
dc.subjectSocial Studies Educationen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Educationen_US
dc.subjectTeachingen_US
dc.title"I Could Make a Difference" Research and Theory on Fostering Adolescents' Political Efficacy and Engagement.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEducation Studiesen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberEccles, Jacquelynne S.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberNiemi, Richard G.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberPalincsar, Annemarie Sullivanen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberZint, Michaela T.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86312/1/brettml_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.