Show simple item record

Essays on the Conditional Nature of Opinion Formation: Multilevel Models Explaining Institutional and Temporal Variation in Behavior.

dc.contributor.authorBargsted, Matias A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-15T17:11:44Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2011-09-15T17:11:44Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86362
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is composed of three papers that study citizens' opinion formation process considering the contextual conditions surrounding them as a key explanatory source of cognitive variation. Taken together, the papers indicate that political regimes that provide abundant cues and easy-to-process political information favor the organization of political opinions and attitudes. My first paper proposes a conceptual framework that interprets the political environment in terms of its degree of complexity and applies it to the structure of citizens' opinions about political issues. My second paper develops and tests hypotheses about how institutional and party system factors encourage the alignment of citizens' political evaluations in accordance with their partisan dispositions. My third paper is an empirical examination of the contentious claim that citizens update their opinions in unbiased fashion. I test this hypothesis by estimating the influence that party identification has over the rate of change of individuals' political opinions on salient political issues. The first two papers employ a cross-national design which studies individuals' political cognition through the lens of the micro-macro linkage, meaning the connection between system-level properties of a polity and the individuals nested in that polity. The third paper studies individuals' opinions considering the passage of time as a key source of heterogeneity. The three papers identify important, and previously unaccounted, empirical patterns such as the varying role of cognitive resources on the level of association of citizens' opinions, the strong influence that clarity of responsibility exercises over the association between partisanship and political evaluations, and the demonstration that individuals update their opinions with strong partisan biases. All papers rely on multilevel modeling techniques, and engage in innovative uses of this statistical framework. This includes dealing with multivariate dependent variables, capturing latent variables, and accounting for the initial conditions problem of longitudinal data. A practical consequence that follows from this dissertation is that when political institutions are designed, we should consider the type of information that average citizens will be exposed to. This can help engage a portion of the electorate that would otherwise not care about public affairs.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectStudies Citizens' Opinion Formation Process Considering the Contextual Conditions Surrounding Them As a Key Explanatory Source of Cognitive Variation.en_US
dc.titleEssays on the Conditional Nature of Opinion Formation: Multilevel Models Explaining Institutional and Temporal Variation in Behavior.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePolitical Scienceen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberBrader, Teden_US
dc.contributor.committeememberJackson, John E.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKedar, Oriten_US
dc.contributor.committeememberTraugott, Michael W.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Sciences (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86362/1/bargsted_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.