"The Bounds of Habitation": The Geography of the American Colonization Society, 1816-1860.
dc.contributor.author | Lovit, Alex | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-09-15T17:16:49Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2011-09-15T17:16:49Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | en_US | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86480 | |
dc.description.abstract | The American Colonization Society (ACS) was founded in 1816, with the mission of transporting African American emigrants from the United States to Africa. This dissertation examines changes in the ideology of the colonizationist movement across both space and time, and concludes that while there was relatively little regional variation among the colonizationist arguments advanced in different sections of the country, the ACS’s goals shifted over time, from an early emphasis on emancipating slaves, to a later focus on free black emigrants. Supporters of colonization were united by a shared vision of “racial geography,” an ideal of global segregation and racially defined citizenship. A quantitative analysis of the ACS’s regional fundraising data demonstrates that the organization had a national support base; the Society received significant donations from nearly every section of the country. Other research sources include published examples of colonizationist and anti-colonizationist rhetoric, the private correspondence of supporters, fictional representations of the colonization scheme, and records of political debates over the plan. Chronological and geographical comparisons of these sources contribute to a comprehensive account of the ACS as an enduring national institution in the antebellum United States. The impact of the antebellum colonization movement should be measured not by the small numbers of emigrants enrolled in the scheme, but rather by the ACS’s rhetorical successes. The Colonization Society had powerful friends and powerful enemies, but its ideology and arguments were part of the national discourses of slavery and race for both supporters and detractors. Abolitionists and proslavery writers defined themselves in contrast to colonizationism. The ACS had its own large body of supporters, who believed that racial homogeneity was essential to an effective American democracy. Colonizationism helped to promote racial definitions of citizenship, and encouraged white Americans to exclude African Americans rhetorically and legally from the nation’s body politic. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | American Colonization Society | en_US |
dc.title | "The Bounds of Habitation": The Geography of the American Colonization Society, 1816-1860. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | History | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Thornton III, J. Mills | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Jones, Martha | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Kelley, Mary C. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Miles, Tiya A. | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | History (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Humanities | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86480/1/alovit_1.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.