Show simple item record

Secondhand Tobacco Smoke Exposure and its Effects among Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization.

dc.contributor.authorBenedict, Merle D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-15T17:17:35Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2011-09-15T17:17:35Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86508
dc.description.abstractInfertility and early pregnancy loss are prevalent in the United States and worldwide, and a large proportion of non-tobacco users are exposed to secondhand tobacco smoke (STS). In one of the only previous studies of early pregnancy that utilized biomarkers of STS exposure, no relationship was observed between urinary cotinine and in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. However, we hypothesize that urine may not be the most relevant sample media within which to measure biomarkers for a study of early pregnancy, and that the lack of an association may have been due to a large degree exposure measurement error. In the first chapter of this dissertation we report a weak rank-order relationship (Spearman r <0.2) and poor exposure category agreement between cotinine concentrations measured in urine and the potentially more biologically-relevant follicular fluid (FF) among 255 women undergoing IVF. We also observed fair reliability (ICC=0.42-0.52) in FF cotinine concentrations from 415 women undergoing multiple IVF cycles. In the second chapter, we report a significant increase in the risk of embryo implantation failure among women exposed to STS compared to those who were unexposed (Odds Ratio[OR]=1.52; 95% confidence interval[CI]=1.20-1.92; Risk Ratio[RR]=1.17; 95% CI=1.10-1.25) based on cotinine measures in FF collected during 3,270 IVF cycles from 1,909 nonsmoking women. We also found a significant decrease in the odds for a livebirth among STS-exposed women (OR=0.75; 95% CI=0.57-0.99; RR=0.81; 95% CI=0.66-0.99). In the third chapter, among 337 of the women in the study, we report a significant increase in circulating prolactin (p=0.03), but no change in circulating TSH, among STS-exposed women. These findings are likely of great public health significance due to continued widespread STS exposure, the rapidly increasing number of couples utilizing IVF, and the potential relationship between elevated prolactin concentrations and a range of downstream adverse health effects. In addition, FF cotinine concentrations, if available, may be desired as a biomarker of low-level tobacco smoke exposure over urinary cotinine in studies of early reproduction. Cotinine measured in FF samples collected at each IVF cycle may be needed to most accurately represent STS exposure in studies utilizing outcome data from multiple cycles.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSecondhand Smokeen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Tobacco Smokeen_US
dc.subjectIn Vitro Fertilizationen_US
dc.subjectFollicular Fluiden_US
dc.subjectCotinineen_US
dc.subjectImplantation Failureen_US
dc.titleSecondhand Tobacco Smoke Exposure and its Effects among Women Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEnvironmental Health Sciencesen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberMeeker, John D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberHarris, Craigen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberTsodikov, Alexanderen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberVahratian, Anjel M.en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelObstetrics and Gynecologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86508/1/merleb_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.