View Item 

Show simple item record

Development of the Two‐Stage Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry
dc.contributor.authorStucky, Brian Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Jessica Y.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Shoou‐yih D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRozier, R. Garyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:31:34Z
dc.date.available2012-12-03T21:17:29Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationStucky, Brian D.; Lee, Jessica Y.; Lee, Shoou‐yih D. ; Rozier, R. Gary (2011). "Development of the Twoâ Stage Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry." Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 39(5). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86828>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-5661en_US
dc.identifier.issn1600-0528en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86828
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherDental Careen_US
dc.subject.otherDental Health Literacyen_US
dc.subject.otherHealth Literacyen_US
dc.subject.otherOral Health Quality of Lifeen_US
dc.subject.otherPsychometricsen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of the Two‐Stage Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Health Management and Policy, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherL.L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, Department of Psychology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Health Policy and Management, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21592170en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86828/1/j.1600-0528.2011.00619.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00619.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. The invisible barrier: literacy and its relationship with oral health. A report of a workgroup sponsored by NIDCR, USPHS, DHHS. J Public Health Dent 2005; 65: 174 – 82.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee JY, Rozier G, Lee S, Bender D, Ruiz RE. Development of a word recognition instrument to test health literacy in dentistry: the REALD‐30 – a brief communication. J Public Health Dent 2007; 67: 94 – 8.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichman JA, Lee JY, Rozier RG, Gong D, Pahel BT, Vann WF Jr. Evaluation of a word recognition instrument to test health literacy in dentistry: the REALD‐99. J Public Health Dent 2007; 67: 99 – 104.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGong DA, Lee JY, Rozier G, Pahel BT, Richman JA, Vann WF Jr. Development and testing of the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Dentistry (TOFHLiD). J Public Health Dent 2007; 67: 105 – 12.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSabbahi D, Lawrence HP, Limeback H, Rootman I. Development and evaluation of an oral health literacy instrument for adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2009; 37: 451 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlade GD. Derivation and validation of a short‐form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25: 284 – 90.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtchison KA, Gironda MW, Messadi D, Der‐Martirosian C. Screening for oral health literacy in an urban dental clinic. J Public Health Dent 2010; 70: 269 – 75.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacek MD, Haynes D, Wells W, Bauer‐Leffler S, Cotton PA, Parker RM. Measuring conceptual health knowledge in the context of oral health literacy: preliminary results. J Public Health Dent 2010; 70: 197 – 204.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller EK, Lee JY, DeWalt DA, Vann WF Jr. Impact of caregiver health literacy on children’s oral health outcomes. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 107 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBetz NE, Weiss DJ. An empirical study of computer administered two‐stage ability testing. Psychometric Methods Program, Research Rep. No. 73–4, Minneapolis: Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota; 1973.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLord FM, (Editor). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1983.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiss DJ. Improving measurement quality and efficiency with adaptive testing. Appl Psychol Meas 1982; 6: 473 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus user’s guide, 5th edn. [Computer Software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThissen D. MULTILOG 7.03 [Computer Software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International; 2003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP, et al. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the Newest Vital Sign. Ann Fam Med 2005; 3: 514 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6: 1 – 55.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrowne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, editors. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993; 136 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 1990; 107: 238 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThissen D, Orlando M. Item response theory for items scored in two categories. In: Thissen D, Wainer H, editors. Test Scoring. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001; 73 – 140.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaker DW. The meaning and the measure of health literacy. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21: 878 – 83.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1600-0528.2011.00619.x.pdf
Size:
137.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.