Show simple item record

Using Peer Mentors to screen for CKD at dialysis units: Targeting high‐risk family members

dc.contributor.authorSwartz, June E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPerry, Erica E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJoy, Sallyen_US
dc.contributor.authorSwartz, Richard D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:32:03Z
dc.date.available2012-07-12T17:42:24Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationSwartz, June E.; Perry, Erica; Joy, Sally; Swartz, Richard D. (2011). "Using Peer Mentors to screen for CKD at dialysis units: Targeting high‐risk family members." Dialysis & Transplantation 40(6): 246-251. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86849>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0090-2934en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6920en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86849
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE The incidence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing and affects one in nine individuals in the United States. Genetics and lifestyle factors contribute to the incidence of CKD and serve as screening targets. We screened for predisposition to CKD at dialysis units in southeast Michigan, where obesity and hypertension are common. Families of dialysis patients, as well as non‐relatives and staff, were evaluated. Peer Mentors with CKD participated in the screening. METHODS “Prevention Fairs” utilized inexpensive screening to determine a predisposition to CKD: urine dipstick for protein, glucose, or blood; BP > 140/90; and body mass index (BMI) > 30. Peer Mentor participation, honoring long‐standing patients, and invitations to state legislators were included. RESULTS “Fairs” at 16 Michigan centers screened 497 individuals: 61% (305) had one finding, 18% (88) had two, and 6% (29) had three. Obesity was most common (220), and then hypertension (169), proteinuria (41), glycosuria (15), and hematuria (13). Although we had hypothesized that the highest risk would be found among genetic family members, positive screening was not statistically different between genetic relatives and other individuals. In addition, findings were distributed equally across varied demographic settings and races, underscoring the importance of social determinants of health. DISCUSSION Genetic factors are hypothesized to be predictors for CKD, but these results suggest that CKD risk may also be related to social determinants such as diet, exercise, health consciousness, socioeconomics, or cultural acceptance of obesity. Screening at dialysis centers, enhanced by participation of peers and social activities, contributes to referral for further treatment.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.titleUsing Peer Mentors to screen for CKD at dialysis units: Targeting high‐risk family membersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Nephrology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNational Kidney Foundation of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86849/1/20582_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/dat.20582en_US
dc.identifier.sourceDialysis & Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUS Renal Data System: USRDS 2008 Annual Data Report. Bethesda, MD: The National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceESRD Annual Data Report, Renal Network 11; 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBash L, Astor B, Coresh J. Risk of incident ESRD: a comprehensive look at cardiovascular risk in factors and 17 years of follow‐up in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010; 55: 31 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBello A, Peters J, Wright J, De Zeeuw D, El Nahas M. A population‐based screening for microalbuminuria among relatives of CKD patients: the Kidney Evaluation and Awareness Program in Sheffield (KEAPS). Am J Kidney Dis. 2008; 52: 434 – 443.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreedman B, Volkova N, Satko S, et al. Population‐based screening for family history of end‐stage renal disease among incident dialysis patients. Am J Nephrol. 2005; 25: 529 – 535.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaterman A, Browne T, Waterman B, Gladstone E, Hostetter T. Attitudes and behaviors of African Americans regarding early detection of kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008; 51: 554 – 562.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolkova N, McClellan W, Klein M, et al. Neighborhood poverty and racial differences in ESRD incidence. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008; 19: 356 – 364.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcClellan W, Satko S, Gladstone E, Krisher J, Narva A, Freedman B. Individuals with a family history of ESRD are a high‐risk population for CKD: implications for targeted surveillance and intervention activities. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 53: S100 – S106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlessner M, Wyatt S, Akylbekova E, et al. Prevalence and awareness of CKD among African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 53: 238 – 247.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins A, Li S, Chen S, Vassalotti J. Participant follow‐up in the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) after initial detection. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008; 51: S69 – S76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhaley‐Connell A, Sowers J, McCullough P, et al. Diabetes mellitus and CKD awareness: the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 53: S11 – S21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeisler M, Piette J. I help you, and you help me: facilitated telephone peer support among patients with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2005; 31: 869 – 879.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerry E, Swartz J, Brown S, Smith D, Kelly G, Swartz R. Peer mentoring: a culturally sensitive approach to end‐of‐life planning for long‐term dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005; 46: 111 – 119.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon C, Galloway T. Review of findings on Chronic Disease Self‐Management Program (CDSMP) outcomes: physical, emotional & health‐related quality of life, healthcare utilization and costs. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Council on Aging; 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMetzler M. Social determinants of health: what, how, why, and now. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 4: A85.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristakis N, Fowler J. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 370 – 379.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsai J, Chen S, Hwang S, Chang J, Lin M, Chen H. Prevalence of risk factors for CKD in spouses and relatives of hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010; 55: 856 – 866.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBomback A, Kshirsagar A, Whaley‐Connell A, et al. Racial differences in kidney function among individuals with obesity and metabolic syndrome: results from the Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP). Am J Kidney Dis. 2010; 55: S4 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichigan BRFSS Surveillance Brief. Available at: http://www.Michigan.gov/documents/MDCH/MIBRFSS_surveillance_brief;_June 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevey A, Schoolwerth A, Burrows N, Williams D, Rabon Stith K, McClellan W. Comprehensive public health strategies for preventing the development, progression, and complications of CKD: report of an expert panel convened by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Am J Kidney Dis. 2009; 53: 522 – 535.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCullough P, Li S, Jurkowitz C, et al. CKD and cardiovascular disease in screened high‐risk volunteer and general populations: the early Kidney and Evaluation Program (KEEP) and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2004. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008; 51 ( suppl 2 ): s38 – s45.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.