Show simple item record

Reinforcement selection acting on the European house mouse hybrid zone

dc.contributor.authorBímová, Barbora Vošlajerováen_US
dc.contributor.authorMacholán, Milošen_US
dc.contributor.authorBaird, Stuart J. E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMunclinger, Pavelen_US
dc.contributor.authorDufková, Petraen_US
dc.contributor.authorLaukaitis, Christina M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKarn, Robert C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLuzynski, Kennethen_US
dc.contributor.authorTucker, Priscilla K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPiálek, Jaroslaven_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:32:37Z
dc.date.available2012-07-12T17:42:24Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationBímová, Barbora Vošlajerová ; Macholán, Miloš ; Baird, Stuart J. E. ; Munclinger, Pavel ; Dufková, Petra ; Laukaitis, Christina M. ; Karn, Robert C. ; Luzynski, Kenneth ; Tucker, Priscilla K. ; Piálek, Jaroslav (2011). "Reinforcement selection acting on the European house mouse hybrid zone." Molecular Ecology 20(11). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86873>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0962-1083en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-294Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86873
dc.description.abstractBehavioural isolation may lead to complete speciation when partial postzygotic isolation acts in the presence of divergent‐specific mate‐recognition systems. These conditions exist where Mus musculus musculus and M. m. domesticus come into contact and hybridize. We studied two mate‐recognition signal systems, based on urinary and salivary proteins, across a Central European portion of the mouse hybrid zone. Introgression of the genomic regions responsible for these signals: the major urinary proteins (MUPs) and androgen binding proteins (ABPs), respectively, was compared to introgression at loci assumed to be nearly neutral and those under selection against hybridization. The preference of individuals taken from across the zone regarding these signals was measured in Y mazes, and we develop a model for the analysis of the transition of such traits under reinforcement selection. The strongest assortative preferences were found in males for urine and females for ABP. Clinal analyses confirm nearly neutral introgression of an Abp locus and two loci closely linked to the Abp gene cluster, whereas two markers flanking the Mup gene region reveal unexpected introgression. Geographic change in the preference traits matches our reinforcement selection model significantly better than standard cline models. Our study confirms that behavioural barriers are important components of reproductive isolation between the house mouse subspecies.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherAndrogen Binding Proteinen_US
dc.subject.otherAssortative Matingen_US
dc.subject.otherBehavioural Cline Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherMajor Urinary Proteinen_US
dc.subject.otherReproductive Isolationen_US
dc.subject.otherSalivary Cuesen_US
dc.subject.otherSpeciationen_US
dc.subject.otherUrinary Cuesen_US
dc.titleReinforcement selection acting on the European house mouse hybrid zoneen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Population Biology, Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republicen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherLaboratory of Mammalian Evolutionary Genetics, Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Veveří 97, CZ‐60200 Brno, Czech Republicen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCIBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Campus Agrário de Vairão, Vairão, Portugalen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBiodiversity Research Group, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republicen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republicen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86873/1/j.1365-294X.2011.05106.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05106.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceMolecular Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbert AYK, Schluter D ( 2004 ) Reproductive character displacement of amle stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection? Evolution, 58, 1099 – 1107.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersson M ( 1994 ) Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaird SJE ( 1995 ) A simulation study of multilocus clines. Evolution, 49, 1038 – 1045.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarton NH, Baird SJE ( 1995 ) Analyse– An Application for Analyzing Hybrid Zones. Freeware, Edinburgh, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarton NH, Bengtsson BO ( 1986 ) The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations. Heredity, 56, 357 – 376.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarton NH, Gale KS ( 1993 ) Genetic analysis of hybrid zones. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (ed. Harrison RG ), pp. 13 – 45, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarton NH, Hewitt GM ( 1989 ) Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature, 341, 497 – 503.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBazykin AD ( 1969 ) Hypothetical mechanism of speciation. Evolution, 23, 685 – 687.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeauchamp GK, Yamazaki K ( 2003 ) Chemical signalling in mice. Biochemical Society Transactions, 31, 147 – 151.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeynon RJ, Hurst JL ( 2003 ) Multiple roles of major urinary proteins in the house mouse. Mus domesticus. Biochemical Society Transactions, 31, 142 – 146.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeynon RJ, Hurst JL, Gaskell SJ et al. ( 2001 ) Mice, MUPs and myths – structure‐function relationships of the major urinary proteins. In: Chemical Signals in Vertebrates (eds Marchlewska‐Koj A, Muller‐Schwarze D, Lepri J ), pp. 149 – 156, Plenum Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeynon RJ, Veggerby C, Payne CE et al. ( 2002 ) Polymorphism in major urinary proteins: molecular heterogeneity in a wild mouse population. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 28, 1429 – 1446.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBímová B, Karn RC, Piálek J ( 2005 ) The role of salivary androgen‐binding protein in reproductive isolation between two subspecies of house mouse: Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 349 – 361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBímová B, Albrecht T, Macholán M, Piálek J ( 2009 ) Signalling components of mate recognition system in the house mouse. Behavioural Processes, 80, 20 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBishop JO, Clark AJ, Clissold PM, Hainey S, Francke U ( 1982 ) Two main groups of mouse major urinary protein genes, both largely located on chromosome 4. EMBO Journal, 1, 615 – 620.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlum MJ ( 2008 ) Ecological and genetic associations across a Heliconius hybrid zone. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21, 330 – 341.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoursot P, Auffray J‐C, Britton‐Davidian J, Bonhomme F ( 1993 ) The evolution of house mice. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 24, 119 – 152.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrennan PA, Kendrick KM ( 2006 ) Mammalian social odours: attraction and individual recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 361, 2061 – 2078.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBridle JR, Butlin RK ( 2002 ) Mating signal variation and bimodality in a mosaic hybrid zone between Chorthippus grasshopper species. Evolution, 56, 1184 – 1198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBridle JR, Baird SJE, Butlin RK ( 2001 ) Spatial structure and habitat variation in a grasshopper hybrid zone. Evolution, 55, 1832 – 1843.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBritton‐Davidian J, Fel‐Clair F, Lopez J, Alibert P, Boursot P ( 2005 ) Postzygotic isolation between the two European subspecies of the house mouse: estimates from fertility patterns in wild and laboratory‐bred hybrids. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 379 – 393.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBronson FH ( 1979 ) The reproductive ecology of the house mouse. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 54, 265 – 299.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBullough RK, Caudrey PJ (eds) ( 1980 ) Solitons. Springer‐Verlag, Berlin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButlin RK ( 1987 ) Speciation by reinforcement. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 8 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButlin RK ( 1995 ) Reinforcement: an idea evolving. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10, 432 – 434.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButlin RK, Hewitt GM ( 1985a ) A hybrid zone between Chorthippus parallelus parallelus and Chorthippus parallelus erythropus (Orthoptera: Acrididae): behavioural characters. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 26, 287 – 299.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButlin RK, Hewitt GM ( 1985b ) A hybrid zone between Chorthippus parallelus parullelus and Chorthippus parallelus erythropus (Orthoptera: Acrididae): morphological and electrophoretic characters. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 26, 269 – 285.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButlin RK, Ritchie MG ( 1991 ) Variation in female mate preference across a grasshopper hybrid zone. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 4, 227 – 240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCheetham SA, Thom MD, Jury F, Ollier WER, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL ( 2007 ) The genetic basis of individual‐recognition signals in the mouse. Current Biology, 17, 1771 – 1777.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChristophe N, Baudoin C ( 1998 ) Olfactory preferences in two subspecies of mice Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus and their hybrids. Animal Behaviour, 56, 365 – 369.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClissold PM, Bishop JO ( 1982 ) Variation in mouse major urinary protein (MUP) genes and the MUP gene products within and between inbred lines. Gene, 18, 211 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCotton S ( 2007 ) Individual recognition: mice, MUPs and the MHC. Current Biology, 17, R971 – R973.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoyne JA, Orr HA ( 2004 ) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, Massachusetts.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarwin C ( 1871 ) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, London.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDean MD, Ardlie KG, Nachman MW ( 2006 ) The frequency of multiple paternity suggests that sperm competition is common in house mice ( Mus domesticus ). Molecular Ecology, 15, 4141 – 4151.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDewsbury DA ( 1982 ) Ejaculate cost and male choice. The American Naturalist, 119, 601 – 610.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDlouhy SR, Karn RC ( 1983 ) The tissue source and cellular control of the apparent size of androgen binding protein (Abp), a mouse salivary protein whose electrophoretic mobility is under the control of sex‐limited saliva pattern (Ssp). Biochemical Genetics, 21, 1057 – 1070.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDlouhy SR, Taylor BA, Karn RC ( 1987 ) The genes for mouse salivary androgen‐binding protein (ABP) subunits alpha and gamma are located on chromosome 7. Genetics, 115, 535 – 543.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobzhansky T ( 1937 ) Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDobzhansky T ( 1940 ) Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. The American Naturalist, 74, 312 – 321.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDod B, Jermiin LS, Boursot P, Chapman VH, Nielsen JT, Bonhomme F ( 1993 ) Counterselection on sex chromosomes in the Mus musculus European hybrid zone. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 6, 529 – 546.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDod B, Smadja C, Karn RC, Boursot P ( 2005 ) Testing for selection on the androgen‐binding protein in the Danish mouse hybrid zone. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 447 – 459.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrickamer LC, Gowaty PA, Holmes CM ( 2000 ) Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Animal Behaviour, 59, 371 – 378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDufková P, Macholán M, Piálek J ( 2011 ) Inference of selection and stochastic effects in the house mouse hybrid zone. Evolution, 65, 993 – 1010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDulac C, Wagner S ( 2006 ) Genetic analysis of brain circuits underlying pheromone signalling. Annual Review of Genetics, 40, 449 – 467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards AWF ( 1992 ) Likelihood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEmes RD, Riley MC, Laukaitis CM, Goodstadt L, Karn RC, Ponting CP ( 2004 ) Comparative evolutionary genomics of androgen‐binding protein genes. Genome Research, 14, 1516 – 1529.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFel‐Clair F, Lenormand T, Catalan J et al. ( 1996 ) Genomic incompatibilities in the hybrid zone between house mice in Denmark: evidence from steep and non‐coincident chromosomal clines for Robertsonian fusions. Genetical Research, 67, 123 – 134.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFisher RA ( 1930 ) The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. A Complete Variorum Edition. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForejt J ( 1996 ) Hybrid sterility in the mouse. Trends in Genetics, 12, 412 – 417.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceForejt J, Iványi P ( 1974 ) Genetic studies on male sterility of hybrids between laboratory and wild mice ( Mus musculus L.). Genetical Research, 24, 189 – 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGanem G, Litel C, Lenormand T ( 2008 ) Variation in mate preference across a house mouse hybrid zone. Heredity, 100, 594 – 601.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGay L, Crochet P‐A, Bell DA, Lenormand T ( 2008 ) Comparing clines on molecular and phenotypic traits in hybrid zones: a window on tension zone models. Evolution, 62, 2789 – 2806.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerlach G ( 1996 ) Emigration mechanisms in feral house mice – a laboratory investigation of the influence of social structure, population density, and aggression. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 39, 159 – 170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerlach G ( 1998 ) Impact of social ties on dispersal, reproduction and dominance in feral house mice ( Mus musculus domesticus ). Ethology, 104, 487 – 499.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGood JM, Handel MA, Nachman MW ( 2008 ) Asymmetry and polymorphism of hybrid male sterility during the early stages of speciation in house mice. Evolution, 62, 50 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaldane JBS ( 1948 ) The theory of a cline. Journal of Genetics, 48, 277 – 284.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarr B ( 2006 ) Genomic islands of differentiation between house mouse subspecies. Genome Research, 16, 730 – 737.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris H, Hopkinson DA ( 1976 ) Handbook of Enzyme Electrophoresis in Human Genetics. North‐Holland Publishing Company, Oxford, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoskin CJ, Higgie M, McDonald KR, Moritz C ( 2005 ) Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature, 437, 1353 – 1356.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoward DJ ( 1993 ) Reinforcement: the origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In: Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process (ed. Harrison RG ), pp. 46 – 69, Oxford University Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHsu F‐F, Nodari F, Kao L‐F et al. ( 2008 ) Structural characterization of sulfated steroids that activate mouse pheromone‐sensing neurons. Biochemistry, 47, 14009 – 14019.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHurst JL ( 2009 ) Female recognition and assessment of males through scent. Behavioural Brain Research, 200, 295 – 303.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHurst JL, Beynon RJ ( 2004 ) Scent wars: the chemobiology of competitive signalling in mice. Bioessays, 26, 1288 – 1298.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJanotová K, Stopka P ( 2009 ) Mechanisms of chemical communication: the role of Major Urinary Proteins. Folia Zoologica, 58, 43 – 59.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarn RC ( 1981 ) Sex‐limited effects of the expression of the db gene in mice during puberty. Biochemical Genetics, 19, 355 – 371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarn RC, Dlouhy SR ( 1991 ) Salivary androgen‐binding protein variation in Mus and other rodents. Journal of Heredity, 82, 453 – 458.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarn RC, Laukaitis CM ( 2003 ) Characterization of two forms of mouse salivary Androgen‐Binding Protein (ABP): implications for evolutionary relationships and ligand‐binding function. Biochemistry, 42, 7162 – 7170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarn RC, Laukaitis CM ( 2009 ) The mechanism of expansion and the volatility it created in three pheromone gene clusters in the mouse ( Mus musculus ) genome. Genome Biology and Evolution, 1, 494 – 503.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarn RC, Nachman MW ( 1999 ) Reduced nucleotide variability at an Androgen‐Binding Protein locus ( Abpa ) in house mice: evidence for positive natural selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 16, 1192 – 1197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarn RC, Orth A, Bonhomme F, Boursot P ( 2002 ) The complex history of a gene proposed to participate in a sexual isolation mechanism in house mice. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 19, 462 – 471.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKey KH ( 1968 ) The concept of stasipatric speciation. Systematic Zoology, 17, 14 – 22.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirkpatrick M, Ravigné V ( 2002 ) Speciation by natural and sexual selection: models and experiments. The American Naturalist, 159, S22 – S35.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKruuk LEB, Baird SJE, Gale KS, Barton NH ( 1999 ) A comparison of multilocus clines maintained by environmental adaptation or by selection against hybrids. Genetics, 153, 1959 – 1971.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLakshmanan M (ed.) ( 1988 ) Solitons. Springer‐Verlag, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLande R ( 1981 ) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 78, 3721 – 3725.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaukaitis CM, Critser ES, Karn RC ( 1997 ) Salivary androgen‐binding protein (ABP) mediates sexual isolation in Mus musculus. Evolution, 51, 2000 – 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaukaitis CM, Dlouhy SR, Emes RD, Ponting CP, Karn RC ( 2005 ) Diverse spatial, temporal, and sexual expression of recently duplicated androgen‐binding protein genes in Mus musculus. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 5, 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaukaitis CM, Heger A, Blakley TD, Munclinger P, Ponting CP, Karn RC ( 2008 ) Rapid bursts of androgen‐binding protein (Abp) gene duplication occurred independently in diverse mammals. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8, 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemmon AR, Smadja C, Kirkpatrick M ( 2004 ) Reproductive character displacement is not the only possible outcome of reinforcement. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 177 – 183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLogan DW, Marton TF, Stowers L ( 2008 ) Species specificity in major urinary proteins by parallel evolution. PLoS ONE, 3, e3280.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuo MM, Fee MS, Katz LC ( 2003 ) Encoding pheromonal signals in the accessory olfactory bulb of behaving mice. Science, 299, 1196 – 1201.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacholán M, Kryštufek B, Vohralík V ( 2003 ) The location of the Mus musculus / M. domesticus hybrid zone in the Balkans: clues from morphology. Acta Theriologica, 48, 177 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacholán M, Munclinger P, Šugerková M et al. ( 2007 ) Genetic analysis of autosomal and X‐linked markers across a mouse hybrid zone. Evolution, 61, 746 – 771.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacholán M, Baird SJE, Munclinger P, Dufková P, Bímová B, Piálek J ( 2008 ) Genetic conflict outweighs heterogametic incompatibility in the mouse hybrid zone? BMC Evolutionary Biology, 8, 271 – 284.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacholán M, Baird SJE, Dufková P, Munclinger P, Vošlajerová Bímová B, Piálek J ( 2011 ) Assessing multilocus introgression patterns: a case study on the mouse X chromosome in Central Europe. Evolution, Early View, DOI: 10.1111/j.1558‐5646.2011.01228.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarshall JL, Arnold ML, Howard DJ ( 2002 ) Reinforcement: the road not taken. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 17, 558 – 563.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMayr E ( 1942 ) Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMihola O, Trachtulec Z, Vlček C, Schimenti JC, Forejt J ( 2009 ) A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase. Science, 323, 373 – 375.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMudge JM, Armstrong SD, McLaren K et al. ( 2008 ) Dynamic instability of the major urinary protein gene family revealed by genomic and phenotypic comparisons between C57 and 129 strain mice. Genome Biology, 9, R91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMunclinger P, Božíková E, Šugerková M, Piálek J, Macholán M ( 2002 ) Genetic variation in house mice ( Mus, Muridae, Rodentia) from the Czech and Slovak Republics. Folia Zoologica, 51, 81 – 92.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMunclinger P, Boursot P, Dod B ( 2003 ) B1 insertions as easy markers for mouse population studies. Mammalian Genome, 14, 359 – 366.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNagylaki T ( 1975 ) Conditions for the existence of clines. Genetics, 80, 595 – 615.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNodari F, Hsu F‐F, Fu X et al. ( 2008 ) Sulfated steroids as natural ligands of mouse pheromone‐sensing neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, 18, 6407 – 6418.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoldus LPJJ, Trienes RJH, Hendriksen AHM, Jansen H, Jansen RG ( 2000 ) The Observer Video‐Pro: new software for the collection, management, and presentation of time‐structured data from videotapes and digital media files. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32, 197 – 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNürnberger B, Barton N, MacCallum C, Gilchrist J, Appleby M ( 1995 ) Natural selection on quantitative traits in the Bombina hybrid zone. Evolution, 49, 1224 – 1238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOka A, Mita A, Sakurai‐Yamatani N et al. ( 2004 ) Hybrid breakdown caused by substitution of the X chromosome between two mouse subspecies. Genetics, 166, 913 – 924.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePanhuis TM, Butlin RK, Zuk M, Tregenza T ( 2001 ) Sexual selection and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 364 – 371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParker GA ( 1984 ) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. In: Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems (ed. Smith RL ), pp. 2 – 60, Academic Press, London.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePasteur N, Pasteur G, Bonhomme F, Catalan J, Britton‐Davidian J ( 1988 ) Practical Isozyme Genetics. Ellis Horwood, Ltd., Chichester, UK.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePayseur BA, Krenz JG, Nachman MW ( 2004 ) Differential patterns of introgression across the X chromosome in a hybrid zone between two species of house mice. Evolution, 58, 2064 – 2078.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhillips BL, Baird SJE, Moritz C ( 2004 ) When vicars meet: a narrow contact zone between morphologically cryptic phylogeographic lineages of the rainforest skink, Carlia rubrigularis. Evolution, 58, 1536 – 1548.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiálek J, Vyskočilová M, Bímová B et al. ( 2008 ) Development of unique house mouse resources suitable for evolutionary studies of speciation. Journal of Heredity, 99, 34 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePtacek MB ( 2000 ) The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates. Behavioural Processes, 51, 111 – 134.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePtacek MB ( 2002 ) Patterns of inheritance of mating signals in interspecific hybrids between sailfin and shortfin mollies (Poeciliidae: Poecilia: Mollienesia ). Genetica, 116, 329 – 342.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaufaste N, Orth A, Belkhir K et al. ( 2005 ) Inference of selection and migration in the Danish house mouse hybrid zone. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 593 – 616.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRitchie MG ( 2007 ) Sexual selection and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 79 – 102.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRobertson DHL, Hurst JL, Searle JB, Gündüz I, Beynon RJ ( 2007 ) Characterization and comparison of major urinary proteins from the house mouse, Mus musculus domesticus, and the aboriginal mouse, Mus macedonicus. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33, 613 – 630.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyan MJ, Rand AS ( 1993 ) Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution, 47, 647 – 657.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSage RD, Atchley WR, Capanna E ( 1993 ) House mice as models in systematic biology. Systematic Biology, 42, 523 – 561.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceServedio MR ( 2004 ) The what and why of research on reinforcement. PLoS Biology, 2, e420.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceServedio MR, Noor MAF ( 2003 ) The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 34, 339 – 364.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlatkin M ( 1975 ) Gene flow and selection on a two‐locus system. Genetics, 81, 787 – 802.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmadja C, Butlin RK ( 2006 ) Speciation: a new role for reinforcement. Heredity, 96, 422 – 423.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmadja C, Ganem G ( 2002 ) Subspecies recognition in the house mouse: a study of two populations from the border of a hybrid zone. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 312 – 320.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmadja C, Ganem G ( 2005 ) Asymmetrical reproductive character displacement in the house mouse. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 18, 1485 – 1493.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmadja C, Ganem G ( 2008 ) Divergence of odorant signals within and between the two European subspecies of the house mouse. Behavioral Ecology, 19, 223 – 230.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmadja C, Catalan J, Ganem G ( 2004 ) Strong premating divergence in a unimodal hybrid zone between two subspecies in the house mouse. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 17, 165 – 176.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStopka P, Janotová K, Heyrovský D ( 2007 ) The advertisement role of major urinary proteins in mice. Physiology and Behavior, 91, 667 – 670.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStopková R, Stopka P, Janotová K, Jedelský P ( 2007 ) Species‐specific expression of major urinary proteins in the house mice ( Mus musculus musculus and Mus musculus domesticus ). Journal of Chemical Ecology, 33, 861 – 869.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStorchová R, Gregorová S, Buckiová D, Kyselová D, Divina P, Forejt J ( 2004 ) Genetic analysis of X‐linked hybrid sterility in the house mouse. Mammalian Genome, 15, 515 – 524.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSzymura JM, Barton NH ( 1986 ) Genetic analysis of a hybrid zone between the fire‐bellied toads, Bombina bombina and B.  variegata, near Cracow in southern Poland. Evolution, 40, 1141 – 1159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSzymura JM, Barton NH ( 1991 ) The genetic structure of the hybrid zone between the firebellied toads Bombina bombina and B.  variegata: comparisons between transects and between loci. Evolution, 45, 237 – 261.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakami Y, Suzuki H ( 2005 ) Morphological, genetic and behavioural analyses of a hybrid zone between the ground beetles Carabus lewisianus and C.  albrechti (Coleoptera, Carabidae): asymmetrical introgression caused by movement of the zone? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 86, 79 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTalley HM, Laukaitis CM, Karn RC ( 2001 ) Female preference for male saliva: implications for sexual isolation of Mus musculus subspecies. Evolution, 55, 631 – 634.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeeter KC, Payseur BA, Harris LW et al. ( 2008 ) Genome‐wide patterns of gene flow across a house mouse hybrid zone. Genetical Research, 18, 67 – 76.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTeeter KC, Thibodeau LM, Gompert Z, Buerkle CA, Nachman MW, Tucker PK ( 2010 ) The variable genomic architecture of isolation between hybridizing species of house mice. Evolution, 64, 472 – 485.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThom MD, Stockley P, Jury F, Ollier WER, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL ( 2008 ) The direct assessment of genetic heterozygosity through scent in the mouse. Current Biology, 18, 619 – 623.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTodrank J, Busquet N, Baudoin C, Heth G ( 2005 ) Preferences of newborn mice for odours indicating closer genetic relatedness: is experience necessary? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 2083 – 2088.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTregenza T, Pritchard VL, Butlin RK ( 2000 ) The origins of premating reproductive isolation: testing hypotheses in the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus. Evolution, 54, 1687 – 1698.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrivers RL ( 1972 ) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971 (ed. Campbell B ), pp. 136 – 179, Heinemann, London.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTucker PK, Sage RD, Warner J, Wilson AC, Eicher EM ( 1992 ) Abrupt cline for sex chromosomes in a hybrid zone between two species of mice. Evolution, 46, 1146 – 1163.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTurelli M, Barton NH, Coyne JA ( 2001 ) Theory and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16, 330 – 343.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVanlerberghe F, Dod B, Boursot P, Bellis M, Bonhomme M ( 1986 ) Absence of Y‐chromosome introgression across the hybrid zone between Mus musculus domesticus and Mus musculus musculus. Genetical Research, 48, 191 – 197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVyskočilová M, Trachtulec Z, Forejt J, Piálek J ( 2005 ) Does geography matter in hybrid sterility in house mice? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 663 – 674.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVyskočilová M, Pražanová G, Piálek J ( 2009 ) Polymorphism in hybrid male sterility in wild‐derived Mus musculus musculus strains on proximal chromosome 17. Mammalian Genome, 20, 83 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWells MM, Henry CS ( 1998 ) Songs, reproductive isolation and speciation in cryptic species of insects: a case study using green lacewings. In: Endless Forms: Species and Speciation (ed. Howard E ), pp. 217 – 233, Oxford University Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWest‐Eberhard M ( 1983 ) Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 58, 155 – 183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWolfram S ( 1992 ) Mathematica: A System for Doing Mathematics by Computer. Addison‐Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Redwood City.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang H, Ding Y, Hutchins LM et al. ( 2009 ) A customized and versatile high‐density array for the mouse. Nature Methods, 6, 663 – 666.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.