Show simple item record

Technical note: A landmark‐based approach to the study of the ear ossicles using ultra‐high‐resolution X‐ray computed tomography data

dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Jodi L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCole, Theodore M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSilcox, Mary T.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:33:45Z
dc.date.available2012-10-01T18:34:26Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationSchmidt, Jodi L.; Cole, Theodore M.; Silcox, Mary T. (2011). "Technical note: A landmark‐based approach to the study of the ear ossicles using ultra‐high‐resolution X‐ray computed tomography data." American Journal of Physical Anthropology 145(4): 665-671. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86912>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0002-9483en_US
dc.identifier.issn1096-8644en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86912
dc.description.abstractPrevious study of the ear ossicles in Primates has demonstrated that they vary on both functional and phylogenetic bases. Such studies have generally employed two‐dimensional linear measurements rather than three‐dimensional data. The availability of Ultra‐ high‐resolution X‐ray computed tomography (UhrCT) has made it possible to accurately image the ossicles so that broadly accepted methodologies for acquiring and studying morphometric data can be applied. Using UhrCT data also allows for the ossicular chain to be studied in anatomical position, so that it is possible to consider the spatial and size relationships of all three bones. One issue impeding the morphometric study of the ear ossicles is a lack of broadly recognized landmarks. Distinguishing landmarks on the ossicles is difficult in part because there are only two areas of articulation in the ossicular chain, one of which (the malleus/incus articulation) has a complex three‐dimensional form. A measurement error study is presented demonstrating that a suite of 16 landmarks can be precisely located on reconstructions of the ossicles from UhrCT data. Estimates of measurement error showed that most landmarks were highly replicable, with an average CV for associated interlandmark distances of less than 3%. The positions of these landmarks are chosen to reflect not only the overall shape of the bones in the chain and their relative positions, but also functional parameters. This study should provide a basis for further examination of the smallest bones in the body in three dimensions. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherGeometric Morphometricsen_US
dc.subject.otherError Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherLandmarksen_US
dc.subject.otherLorisen_US
dc.subject.otherCallicebusen_US
dc.titleTechnical note: A landmark‐based approach to the study of the ear ossicles using ultra‐high‐resolution X‐ray computed tomography dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelAnthropologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anthropology, Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada K9J 7B8en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Basic Medical Science, School of Medicine, University of Missouri‐Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON, Canada M1C 1A4en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Social Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Scarborough, Ontario, Canada M1C 1A4en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21732321en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86912/1/21543_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajpa.21543en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeman MN, Ross CF. 2004. Primate auditory diversity and its influence on hearing performance. Anat Rec A 281: 1123 – 1137.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlohr S, Leckelt J, Kierdorf U, Kierdorf H. 2010. How reproducibly can human ear ossicles be measured? A study of inter‐observer error. Anat Rec 293: 2094 – 2106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMasali M. 1964. Dati sulla variabilita morphometrica e ponderale degli ossicini dell'udito nell'Uomo. Archivio Italiano di Anatomia ed Embriologia 69: 435 – 446.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMasali M. 1971. Morphometry of ear bones of some New World Primates. In: Biegert J, Leutenegger W, editors. Taxonomy, anatomy, reproduction. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress of Primatology, 1970, Vol. 1. Zurich: Karger, Basel. p 226 – 232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMasali M, Borgognini Tarli S, Maffei M. 1992. Auditory ossicles and the evolution of the primate ear: a biomechanical approach. In: Wind J, editor. Language origin: a multidisciplinary approach. Netherlands: Kluwer. p 67 – 86.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMasali M, Cremasco MM. 2006. Hoc alterum auditus organi ossiculum est: ear ossicles in physical anthropology. Hum Evol 21: 1 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuam R, Rak Y. 2008. Auditory ossicles from southwest Asian Mousterian sites. J Hum Evol 54: 414 – 433.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRasband WS. 1997‐2009. ImageJ. Software and documentation. U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, Available at: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRichtsmeier JT, Paik CH, Elfert PC, Cole III TM, Dahlman HR. 1995. Precision, repeatability and validation of the localization of cranial landmarks using computed tomography scans. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 32: 217 – 227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosowski JJ. 1992. Hearing in transitional mammals: predictions from the middle‐ear anatomy and hearing capabilities of extant mammals. In: Webster DB, Ray RR, Popper AN, editors. The evolutionary biology of hearing. New York: Springer‐Verlag. p 615 – 631.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss AH, Williams S. 2008. Testing repeatability and error of coordinate landmark data acquired from crania. J Forensic Sci 53: 782 – 785.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiori MS, Masali M. 1983. Multivariate analysis of the ear bones of primates in taxonomic and evolutionary surveys. J Hum Evol 12: 563 – 571.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd ed. New York: W.H. Freeman and Co.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValeri CJ, Cole III TM, Lele S, Richtsmeier JT. 1998. Capturing data from three‐dimensional surfaces using fuzzy landmarks. Am J Phys Anthropol 107: 113 – 124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZwislocki J. 1965. Analysis of some auditory characteristics. In: Luce RD, Bush RR, Galanter E, editors. Handbook of mathematical psychology. New York: Wiley. p 1 – 98.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.