Show simple item record

Outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation: Comparison of the adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study and the national experience

dc.contributor.authorOlthoff, Kim M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbecassis, MIchael M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorEmond, Jean C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKam, Igalen_US
dc.contributor.authorMerion, Robert M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Brenda W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTong, Lanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:35:08Z
dc.date.available2012-09-04T15:27:42Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationOlthoff, Kim M.; Abecassis, Michael M.; Emond, Jean C.; Kam, Igal; Merion, Robert M.; Gillespie, Brenda W.; Tong, Lan (2011). "Outcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation: Comparison of the adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study and the national experience ." Liver Transplantation 17(7): 789-797. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86972>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6465en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6473en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86972
dc.description.abstractThe study objectives were to determine whether the findings of the Adult‐to‐Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) reflect the U.S. national experience and to define risk factors for patient mortality and graft loss in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A2ALL previously identified risk factors for mortality after LDLT, which included early center experience, older recipient age, and longer cold ischemia time. LDLT procedures at 9 A2ALL centers ( n = 702) and 67 non‐A2ALL centers ( n = 1664) from January 1998 through December 2007 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database were analyzed. Potential predictors of time from transplantation to death or graft failure were tested using Cox regression. No significant difference in overall mortality between A2ALL and non‐A2ALL centers was found. Higher hazard ratios (HRs) were associated with donor age (HR = 1.13 per 10 years, P = 0.0002), recipient age (HR = 1.20 per 10 years, P = 0.0003), serum creatinine levels (HR = 1.52 per loge unit increase, P < 0.0001), hepatocellular carcinoma (HR = 2.12, P <0.0001) or hepatitis C virus (HR = 1.18, P = 0.026), intensive care unit stay (HR = 2.52, P < 0.0001) or hospitalization (HR = 1.62, P < 0.0001) versus home, earlier center experience (LDLT case number 15: HR = 1.61, P < 0.0001, and a cold ischemia time >4.5 hours (HR = 1.79, P = 0.0006). Except for center experience, risk factor effects between A2ALL and non‐A2ALL centers were not significantly different. Variables associated with graft loss were identified and showed similar trends. In conclusion, mortality and graft loss risk factors were similar in A2ALL and non‐A2ALL centers. These analyses demonstrate that findings from the A2ALL consortium are relevant to other centers in the U.S. performing LDLT, and conclusions and recommendations from A2ALL may help to guide clinical decision making. Liver Transpl 17:789‐797, 2011. © 2011 AASLD.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.titleOutcomes of adult living donor liver transplantation: Comparison of the adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study and the national experienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartments of Surgery University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, ILen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NYen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, COen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPenn Transplant Institute, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 2 Dulles Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21360649en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86972/1/22288_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lt.22288en_US
dc.identifier.sourceLiver Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWachs ME, Bak TE, Karrer FM, Everson GT, Shrestha R, Trouillot TE, et al. Adult living donor liver transplantation using a right hepatic lobe. Transplantation 1998; 66: 1313 ‐ 1316.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlthoff KM, Merion RM, Ghobrial RM, Abecassis MM, Fair JH, Fisher RA, et al. Outcomes of 385 adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplant recipients: a report from the A2ALL consortium. Ann Surg 2005; 242: 314 ‐ 323.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFreise CE, Gillespie BW, Koffron AJ, Lok AS, Pruett TL, Emond JC, et al. Recipient morbidity after living and deceased donor liver transplantation: findings from the A2ALL retrospective cohort study. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 2569 ‐ 2579.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGhobrial RM, Freise CE, Trotter JF, Tong L, Ojo AO, Fair JH, et al. Donor morbidity after living donation for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 468 ‐ 476.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLo CM, Fan ST, Liu CL, Yong BH, Wong Y, Lau GK, et al. Lessons learned from one hundred right lobe living donor liver transplants. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 151 ‐ 158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePomposelli JJ, Verbesey J, Simpson MA, Lewis WD, Gordon FD, Khettry U, et al. Improved survival after live donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) using right lobe grafts: program experience and lessons learned. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 589 ‐ 598.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShah SA, Levy GA, Greig PD, Smith R, McGilvray ID, Lilly LB, et al. Reduced mortality with right‐lobe living donor compared to deceased‐donor liver transplantation when analyzed from the time of listing. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 998 ‐ 1002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxelrod DA, Guidinger MK, McCullough KP, Leichtman AB, Punch JD, Merion RM. Association of center volume with outcome after liver and kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 920 ‐ 927.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiss ES, Meguid RA, Patel ND, Russell SD, Shah AS, Baumgartner WA, Conte JV. Increased mortality at low‐volume orthotopic heart transplantation centers: should current standards change? Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 86: 1250 ‐ 1260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 511 ‐ 520.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2117 ‐ 2127.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerg CL, Gillespie BW, Merion RM, Brown RS Jr, Abecassis MM, Trotter JF, et al. Improvement in survival associated with adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 1806 ‐ 1813.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShaked A, Ghobrial RM, Merion RM, Shearon TH, Emond JC, Fair JH, et al. Incidence and severity of acute cellular rejection in recipients undergoing adult living donor or deceased donor liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 301 ‐ 308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGillespie BW, Merion RM, Ortiz‐Rios E, Tong L, Shaked A, Brown RS, et al. Database comparison of the Adult‐To‐Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation Cohort Study (A2ALL) and the SRTR U.S. Transplant Registry. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 1621 ‐ 1633.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.