View Item 

Show simple item record

Consequential Life Cycle Assessment With Market‐Driven Design
dc.contributor.authorWhitefoot, Kate S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGrimes‐casey, Hilary G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGirata, Carol E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMorrow, William Rossen_US
dc.contributor.authorWinebrake, James J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKeoleian, Gregory A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSkerlos, Steven J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:35:13Z
dc.date.available2012-12-03T21:17:30Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationWhitefoot, Kate S.; Grimes‐casey, Hilary G. ; Girata, Carol E.; Morrow, W. Ross; Winebrake, James J.; Keoleian, Gregory A.; Skerlos, Steven J. (2011). "Consequential Life Cycle Assessment With Marketâ Driven Design." Journal of Industrial Ecology 15(5). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86975>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1088-1980en_US
dc.identifier.issn1530-9290en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/86975
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherDesign for Environment (DfE)en_US
dc.subject.otherIndustrial Ecologyen_US
dc.subject.otherPartial Equilibrium Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherPolicy Analysisen_US
dc.subject.otherSustainability Assessmenten_US
dc.subject.otherSystems Modelingen_US
dc.titleConsequential Life Cycle Assessment With Market‐Driven Designen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumCenter for Sustainable Systems at the University of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherR.W. Beck, a SAIC company, in Albany, New York, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherIowa State University in Ames, Iowa, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCollege of Liberal Arts and a professor of the Department of Science, Technology and Society/Public Policy at the Rochester Institute of Technology in Rochester, New York, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86975/1/j.1530-9290.2011.00367.x.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/86975/2/JIEC_367_sm_SuppMat.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00367.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Industrial Ecologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArnold, S., C. Balis, D. Jeckel, S. Larcher, P. Uhl, and S. M. Shahed. 2005. Advances in turbocharging technology and its impact on meeting proposed California GHG emission regulations. Paper presented as part of the SAE Technical Paper Series at the SAE World Congress, Detroit, MI, USA, 11−15 April.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAVL LIST GmbH. 2008. AVL Cruise version 2008. Graz, Austria.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxtell, R. L., C. J. Andrews, and M. J. Small. 2001. Agent‐based modeling and industrial ecology. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5 ( 4 ): 10 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd, J. H. and R. E. Mellman. 1980. The effect of fuel economy standards on the US automotive market: An hedonic demand analysis. Transportation Research Record A 14 ( 5–6 ): 367 – 378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBouman, M., R. Heijungs, E. van der Voet, J. C. J. M. van den Bergh, and G. Huppes. 2000. Material flows and economic models: An analytical comparison of SFA, LCA and partial equilibrium models. Ecological Economics 32 ( 2 ): 195 – 216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChertow, M. 2000. The IPAT equation and its variants: Changing views of technology and environmental impact. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4 ( 4 ): 13 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurran, M., M. Mann, and G. Norris. 2005. The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. Journal of Cleaner Production 13 ( 8 ): 853 – 862.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrenfeld, J. 1997. Industrial ecology: A framework for product and process design. Journal of Cleaner Production 5: 87 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEkvall, T. and A. Andræ. 2006. Attributional and consequential environmental assessment of the shift to lead‐free solders. International Journal of LCA 11 ( 5 ): 344 – 353.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEkvall, T. and B. Weidema. 2004. System boundaries and input data in consequential life cycle inventory analysis. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9 ( 3 ): 161 – 171.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFinnveden, G., M. Hauschild, T. Ekvall, J. Guinée, R. Heijungs, S. Hellweg, A. Koehler, D. Pennington, and S. Suh. 2009. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 91 ( 1 ): 1 – 21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer, C. and R. Newell. 2008. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55 ( 2 ): 142 – 162.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrischknecht, B. 2009. Exploring public/private tradeoffs in vehicle design through engineering models and market simulation. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrischknecht, B., K. Whitefoot, and P. Y. Papalambros. 2010. On the suitability of econometric demand models in design for market systems. Journal of Mechanical Design 132 ( 12 ): 57 – 67.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarcia, R. 2005. Uses of agent‐based modeling in innovation/new product development research. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22 ( 5 ): 380 – 398.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldberg, P. K. 1998. The effects of the corporate average fuel efficiency standards in the US. Journal of Industrial Economics 46 ( 1 ): 1 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraham, D. J. and S. Glaister. 2002. The demand for automobile fuel: A survey of elasticities. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 36 ( 1 ): 1 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrimes‐Casey, H., T. P. Seager, T. L. Theis, and S. E. Powers. 2007. A game theory framework for cooperative management of refillable and disposable bottle life cycles. Journal of Cleaner Production 15 ( 17 ): 1618 – 1627.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeijungs, R. 1994. A generic method for the identification of options for cleaner products. Ecological Economics 10 ( 1 ): 69 – 81.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeijungs, R. and S. Suh. 2002. The computational structure of life cycle assessment. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHertwich, E. G. 2005. Life cycle approaches to sustainable consumption: A critical review. Environmental Science and Technology 39 ( 13 ): 4673 – 4684.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu, X. and D. Ralph. 2007. Using EPECs to model bilevel games in restructured electricity markets with locational prices. Operations Research 55 ( 5 ): 809 – 827.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuijbregts, M., W. Gilijamse, A. Ragas, and L. Reijnders. 2003. Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life‐cycle assessment: A case study comparing two insulation options for a Dutch one‐family dwelling. Environmental Science & Technology 37 ( 11 ): 2600 – 2608.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceISO (International Organisation for Standardisation). 1997. ISO 14040: Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobsen, M. 2010. Evaluating U.S. fuel economy standards in a model with producer household heterogeneity. Working paper. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, C. T. 1993. Another look at US passenger vehicle use and the “rebound” effect from improved fuel efficiency. Energy Journal 14 ( 4 ): 99 – 110.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeoleian, G. A. and D. Menerey. 1994. Sustainable development by design: Review of life cycle design and related approaches. Air and Waste 44 ( 5 ): 645 – 668.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeoleian, G. A., G. M. Lewis, R. B. Coulon, V. J. Camobreco, and H. P. Toulon. 1998. LCI modeling challenges and solutions for a complex product system: A mid‐sized automobile. Total Life Cycle Conference Proceedings, no. 982169. Warrendale, PA: SAE International.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLave, L., H. Maclean, C. Hendrickson, and R. Lankey. 2000. Life‐cycle analysis of alternative automobile fuel/propulsion technologies. Environmental Science & Technology 34 ( 17 ): 3598 – 3605.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLenzen, M. 2001. Errors in conventional and input‐output–based life‐cycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4 ( 4 ): 127 – 148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLenzen, M. 2006. Uncertainty of end‐point impact measures: Implications for decision‐making. International Journal of LCA 11 ( 3 ): 189 – 199.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLifset, R. 2006. Industrial ecology and life cycle assessment, what's the use? International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 11 ( 1 ): 14 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLloyd, S. and R. Ries. 2008. Characterizing, propagating and analyzing uncertainty in life‐cycle assessment: A survey of quantitative approaches. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11 ( 1 ): 161 – 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLou, H. H., M. A. Kulkami, A. Singh, and Y. L. Huang. 2004. A game theory based approach for emergy analysis of industrial ecosystem under uncertainty. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy 6 ( 3 ): 156 – 161.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLouviere, J., D. Hensher, and J. Swait. 2003. Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMessner, C. 2007. Werkstoffe fur Motoren und Antriebssyteme, I Otto‐ und Disel motoren. [Materials for engines and drive systems: Petrol and diesel engines.] Wintersemester 2006/2007. Munich, Germany: Technical University of Munich.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichalek, J. J., P. Y. Papalambros, and S. J. Skerlos. 2004. A study of fuel efficiency and emission policy impact on optimal vehicle design decisions. Journal of Mechanical Design 126 ( 6 ): 1062 – 1070.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMihelcic, J. R., J. C. Crittenden, M. J. Small, D. R. Shonnard, D. R. Hokanson, Q. Zhang, H. Chen, S. A. Sorby, V. U. James, J. W. Sutherland and J. L. Schnoor. 2003. Sustainability science and engineering: the emergence of a new metadiscipline. Environmental Science & Technology 37 ( 23 ): 5314 – 5324.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorrow, R. 2008. Equilibrium pricing in empirically relevant differentiated product market models. PhD Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParry, I. W. H. 2004. Are emissions permits regressive? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47 ( 2 ): 364 – 387.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoss, S., D. Evans, and M. Weber. 2002. How LCA studies deal with uncertainty. International Journal of LCA 7 ( 1 ): 47 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSamuelson, P. A. 1983. Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandén, B. A. and M. Karlström. 2007. Positive and negative feedback in consequential life‐cycle assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production 15 ( 15 ): 1469 – 1481.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt, J. H. and Weidema, B. P. 2008. Shift in the marginal supply of vegetable oil. International Journal of LCA 13 ( 3 ): 235 – 239.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry). 1993. Guidelines for life‐cycle assessment: A “code of practice.” Paper presented at the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Workshop, 31 March–3 April Sesimbra, Portugal.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShiau, C‐S. N. and J. J. Michalek. 2009. Should designers worry about market systems? Journal of Mechanical Design 131 ( 1 ): 95 – 105.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkerlos, S. J., Morrow, W. R., and J. J. Michalek. 2005. Sustainable design engineering and science: Selected challenges and case studies. In Sustainability science and engineering, edited by M. Abraham. Amsterdam: Elsevier.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuh, S. and G. Huppes. 2005. Methods for life cycle inventory of a product. Journal of Cleaner Production 13: 687 – 697.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakase, K., Y. Kondo, and A. Washizu. 2005. An analysis of sustainable consumption by the waste input‐output model. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9 ( 1–2 ): 201 – 219.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrain, K. 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Energy Information Administration. 2005. Household Vehicles Energy Use: Latest Data & Trends. http://www.eia.gov/emeu/rtecs/nhts_survey/2001/index.html. Accessed February 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Energy Information Administration. 2010. Annual Energy Outlook 2010. US Department of Energy Report DOE/EIA‐0383.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, E., C. Weber, and T. Hawkins. 2009. Hybrid framework for managing uncertainty in life cycle inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology 13 ( 6 ): 928 – 944.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitefoot, K., M. Fowlie, and S. Skerlos. 2011. Product design responses to industrial policy: Evaluating fuel economy standards using an engineering model of endogenous product design. Energy Institute at Haas Working Paper WP‐214. Berkeley, CA: University of California Energy Institute.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1530-9290.2011.00367.x.pdf
Size:
356.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
JIEC_367_sm_SuppMat.pdf
Size:
353.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.