Show simple item record

Medical students' perceptions of the body donor as a “First Patient” or “Teacher”: A pilot study

dc.contributor.authorBohl, Michael A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBosch, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorHildebrandt, Sabineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:36:48Z
dc.date.available2012-09-04T15:27:45Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationBohl, Michael; Bosch, Peter; Hildebrandt, Sabine (2011). "Medical students' perceptions of the body donor as a “First Patient” or “Teacher”: A pilot study." Anatomical Sciences Education 4(4): 208-213. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87042>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1935-9772en_US
dc.identifier.issn1935-9780en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87042
dc.description.abstractUniversity of Michigan Medical School (UMMS) students attending a seminar on the history and ethics of anatomical dissection were fascinated by a report on the dissection room experience in Thailand that relates the body donor's status as a teacher. The students felt that they had naturally adopted the “body as teacher” approach in their dissection course, rather than the “body as first patient” approach that is encouraged by faculty. It was decided to explore the question whether other medical students shared these perceptions. A questionnaire was sent out to all UMMS students who had finished the anatomical dissection course. One hundred twenty‐eight responses from a population of 500 students were received. Results indicate that students believe the “body as teacher” approach is more effective in engendering respect and empathy towards the body and towards future patients, and in facilitating students' emotional development. Students also reported wanting a more personal relationship with their donors. Eighty four percent of students preferred the “body as teacher” approach to the currently taught “body as first patient” approach. The results support the hypothesis that students' desired closer personal relationship with donors might be better facilitated by the "body as teacher" approach, and that this closer relationship engenders empathy and respect towards the donor and future patients. A new model for anatomy programs could introduce the donor first as a teacher and later transition into viewing the donor as a patient. Anat Sci Educ. © 2011 American Association of Anatomists.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherAnatomical Dissectionen_US
dc.subject.otherBody Donorsen_US
dc.subject.otherFirst Patienten_US
dc.subject.otherEmpathyen_US
dc.subject.otherPerception of Anatomy Courseen_US
dc.subject.otherGreat Teacheren_US
dc.titleMedical students' perceptions of the body donor as a “First Patient” or “Teacher”: A pilot studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Anatomical Sciences, Department of Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Anatomical Sciences, Department of Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School, 3767 Medical Science Building II, Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109‐0608, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21618447en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/87042/1/231_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ase.231en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAnatomical Sciences Educationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertman SL, Marks SC Jr. 1985. Humanities in medical education: Rationale and resources for the dissection laboratory. Med Educ 19: 374 – 381.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanby CA, Bush TA. 2010. Humanities in gross anatomy project: A novel humanistic learning tool at Des Moines University. Anat Sci Educ 3: 94 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoulehan JL, Williams PC, Landis D, Naser C. 1995. The first patient: Reflections and stories about the anatomy cadaver. Teach Learn Med 7: 61 – 66.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDruce M, Johnson MH. 1994. Human dissection and attitudes of preclinical students to death and bereavement. Clin Anat 7: 42 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin SC, Hsu J, Fan VY. 2009. “Silent virtuous teachers”: Anatomical dissection in Taiwan. BMJ 339: b5001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearson WG Jr, Hoagland TM. 2010. Measuring change in professionalism attitudes during the gross anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ 3: 12 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrakash, Prabhu LV, Rai R, D'Costa S, Jiji PJ, Singh G. 2007. Cadavers as teachers in medical education: Knowledge is the ultimate gift of body donors. Singapore Med J 48: 186 – 189.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePenney JC. 1985. Reactions of medical students to dissection. J Med Educ 60: 58 – 60.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuilligan K. 2010. IUN teaches compassion, respect for patients. nwi.com—The Times of Northwest Indiana. Nwi.com, Munster, IN. URL: http://www.nwitimes.com/news/special‐section/heath‐innovation/article_08f2bea7‐96dc‐ 583f‐a483‐59f8f21bbd76.html [accessed 28 February 2011].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRizzolo LJ. 2002. Human dissection: An approach to interweaving the traditional and humanistic goals of medical education. Anat Rec 269: 242 – 248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSegal DA. 1988. A patient so dead: American medical students and their cadavers. Anthropol Q 61: 17 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwartz WJ. 2006. Using gross anatomy to teach and assess professionalism in the first year of medical school. Clin Anat 19: 437 – 441en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwick HM. 2006. Medical professionalism and the clinical anatomist. Clin Anat 19: 393 – 402.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTalarico EF Jr, Prather AD. 2007. A piece of my mind. Connecting the dots to make a difference. JAMA 298: 381 – 382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTank PW. 2008. Grant's Dissector. 14th Ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 304 p.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrotman P. (Director/producer). 2009. Donated to Science (DVD). Dunedin, New Zealand: Paul Trotman Films. 80 min.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUMMS. 2011. University of Michigan Medical School. Medical Gross Anatomy. Introduction to Gross Anatomy. The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI. URL: http://www.med.umich.edu/lrc/coursepages/m1/anatomy2010/html/courseinfo/info.html. [accessed 3 January 2011].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagoner NE, Romero‐O'Connell JM. 2009. Privileged learning. Anat Sci Educ 2: 47 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWear D. 1989. Cadaver talk: Medical students' accounts of their year‐long experience. Death Stud 13: 379 – 391.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeeks SE, Harris EE, Kinzey WG. 1995. Human gross anatomy: A crucial time to encourage respect and compassion in students. Clin Anat 8: 69 – 79.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinkelmann A, Güldner FH. 2004. Cadavers as teachers: The dissecting room experience in Thailand. BMJ 329: 1455 – 1457.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.