Show simple item record

Minimizing the diagnosis of “follicular lesion of undetermined significance” and identifying predictive features for neoplasia

dc.contributor.authorJing, Xinen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoh, Michael H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKnoepp, Stewart M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorZhao, Lilien_US
dc.contributor.authorMichael, Claire W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:37:35Z
dc.date.available2012-12-03T21:17:30Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.citationJing, Xin; Roh, Michael H.; Knoepp, Stewart M.; Zhao, Lili; Michael, Claire W. (2011). "Minimizing the diagnosis of “follicular lesion of undetermined significance” and identifying predictive features for neoplasia." Diagnostic Cytopathology 39(10): 737-742. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87071>en_US
dc.identifier.issn8755-1039en_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0339en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87071
dc.description.abstractWe used proposed standard morphologic criteria as a guideline to conduct a 10‐year retrospective review of thyroid fine‐needle aspiration specimens that were originally interpreted as “follicular lesion of undetermined significance” and followed by surgical intervention. We sought to investigate whether the indeterminate diagnosis could be minimized by assessing various cytomorphologic features and identifying the features predictive of neoplasia. Using the standard morphologic criteria, we semi‐quantitatively assessed a total of 24 cytomorphologic features in 123 aspirates and recorded an overall interpretation on completion of the review. Cyto‐histologic correlation was evaluated and logistic regression model was performed to identify cytomorphologic features predictive of neoplasia. Although 32 of 123 aspirates remained in the indeterminate category, the retrospective review reclassified 64 aspirates as non‐neoplasia and 27 aspirates as neoplasia. Histologic confirmation was achieved in 47 (73.4%) non‐neoplastic and 15 (55.6%) neoplastic aspirates with a diagnostic accuracy of 68.1%. Furthermore, our analysis demonstrated that neoplasia is positively associated with the presence of syncytial tissue fragments, isolated microfollicles, follicles with scalloped borders, scant cytoplasm, irregular nuclear membranes, nuclear overlapping, coarse chromatin, and increased cellularity. On the contrary, the presence of honeycombing tissue fragments, background colloid, and histiocytes inversely correlated with neoplasia. Overall, using proposed standard morphological criteria can minimize the diagnosis of “follicular lesion of undetermined significance,” and allow for more accurate cyto‐histologic correlation, and thereby playing a substantial role in reducing unnecessary surgical intervention. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherFNAen_US
dc.subject.otherThyroid Nodulesen_US
dc.subject.otherFollicular Lesion of Undetermined Significanceen_US
dc.titleMinimizing the diagnosis of “follicular lesion of undetermined significance” and identifying predictive features for neoplasiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPathologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiostatistics Unit, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, 2G332 UH, Ann Arbor, MI 48109‐0054en_US
dc.identifier.pmid20949471en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/87071/1/21459_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/dc.21459en_US
dc.identifier.sourceDiagnostic Cytopathologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGharib H. Fine‐needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: Advantages, limitations, and effect. Mayo Clin Proc 1994; 69: 44 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolleman F, Hoekstra JB, Ruitenberg HM. Evaluation of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. Cytopathology 1995; 6: 168 – 175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMandreker SR, Nadkarni NS, Pinto RG, Menezes S. Role of fine needle aspiration cytology as the initial modality in the investigation of thyroid lesions. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 898 – 904.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZagorianakou P, Malamou‐Mitsi V, Zagorianakou N, Stefanou D, Tsatsoulis A, Agnantis NJ. The role of fine‐needle aspiration biopsy in the management of patients with thyroid nodules. In Vivo 2005; 19: 605 – 609.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBusseniers AE, Oertel YC. Cellular adenomatoid nodules of the thyroid: review of 219 fine‐needle aspirates. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9: 581 – 589.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoller DN, Ibrahim AK, Cummings MH, Mikel JJ, Boote D, Perry M. Fine‐needle aspiration of the thyroid. Cancer 2000; 90: 239 – 244.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreaves TS, Olvera M, Florentine BD, et al. Follicular lesions of thyroid: A 5‐year fine‐needle aspiration experience. Cancer 2000; 90: 335 – 341.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaloch ZW, Cibas ES, Clark DP, et al. The National Cancer Institute Thyroid fine needle aspiration state of the science conference: A summation. CytoJournal 2008; 5: 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShi Y, Ding X, Klein M, et al. Thyroid fine‐needle aspiration with atypia of undetermined significance: A necessary or optional category? Cancer Cytopathol 2009; 117: 298 – 304.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKini SR. Thyroid cytopathology: An atlas and text. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. 513 p.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJing X, Michael CW, Pu RT. The clinical and diagnostic impact of using standard criteria of adequacy assessment and diagnostic terminology on thyroid nodule fine needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2008; 36: 161 – 166.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLayfield LJ, Morton MJ, Cramer HM, Hirschowitz S. Implications of the proposed thyroid fine‐needle aspiration category of “follicular lesion of undetermined significance”: A five‐year multi‐institutional analysis. Diagn Cytopathol 2009; 37: 710 – 714.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClary KM, Condel JL, Liu Y, Johnson DR, Grzybicki DM, Raab SS. Interobserver variability in the fine needle aspiration biopsy diagnosis of follicular lesions of the thyroid gland. Acta Cytol 2005; 49: 378 – 382.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKini SR, Miller JM, Hamburger JI, Smith‐Purslow MJ. Cytopathology of follicular lesions of the thyroid gland. Diagn Cytopathol 1985; 1: 123 – 132.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaloch ZW, Sack MJ, Yu GH, Livolsi VA, Gupta PK. Fine‐needle aspiration of thyroid: An institutional experience. Thyroid 1998; 8: 565 – 569.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaraway NP, Sneige N, Samaan NA. Diagnostic pitfalls in thyroid fine‐needle aspiration: a review of 394 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1993; 9: 345 – 350.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBaloch Z, LiVolsi VA, Jain P, et al. Role of repeat fine‐needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the management of thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol 2003; 29: 203 – 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang J, Schnadig V, Logrono R, Wasserman PG. Fine‐needle aspiration of thyroid nodules: A study of 4703 patients with histologic and clinical correlations. Cancer 2007; 111: 306 – 315.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYassa L, Cibas ES, Benson CB, et al. Long‐term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation. Cancer 2007; 111: 508 – 516.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNikiforov YE, Steward DL, Robinson‐Smith TM, et al. Molecular testing for mutations in improving the fine‐needle aspiration diagnosis of thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 2092 – 2098.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNikiforova MN, Nikiforov YE. Molecular diagnostics and predictors in thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009; 19: 1351 – 1361.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.