View Item 

Show simple item record

Linking top‐down and bottom‐up processes through the new U.S. National Ocean Policy
dc.contributor.authorSievanen, Leilaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLeslie, Heather M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWondolleck, Julia M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorYaffee, Steven L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcLeod, Karen L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Lisa M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:37:53Z
dc.date.available2012-10-01T18:34:38Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationSievanen, Leila; Leslie, Heather M.; Wondolleck, Julia M.; Yaffee, Steven L.; McLeod, Karen L.; Campbell, Lisa M. (2011). "Linking top‐down and bottom‐up processes through the new U.S. National Ocean Policy." Conservation Letters 4(4). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87083>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1755-263Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1755-263Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87083
dc.description.abstractTwo of the priority objectives in the new U.S. National Ocean Policy are “ecosystem‐based management” (EBM) and “coastal and marine spatial planning” (CMSP). Drawing from several studies demonstrating these concepts in practice in the United States and elsewhere, we provide recommendations for those engaged in implementing the new policy. We describe the types of strategic policy actions and management choices currently being used in ecosystem‐based management efforts to provide opportunities for learning and problem‐solving, enable capacity for action, and enhance coordination among existing initiatives. We show that implementation of this ambitious national policy at local to regional scales—where people are most closely linked with coastal and marine systems—will require close attention to these social, political, and institutional issues, as well as to ecological constraints and objectives.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherEcosystem‐Based Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherMarine Conservationen_US
dc.subject.otherMarine Managementen_US
dc.subject.otherMarine Policyen_US
dc.subject.otherMarine Spatial Planningen_US
dc.subject.otherNational Ocean Policyen_US
dc.titleLinking top‐down and bottom‐up processes through the new U.S. National Ocean Policyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 3512 Dana Building, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 3522 Dana Building, 440 Church St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Environmental Studies, Box 1943, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Environmental Studies and Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Box 1943, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCOMPASS, Oregon State University, Department of Zoology, 3029 Cordley Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331, USAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, BRL 309 DUML, 135 Duke Marine Lab Rd., Beaufort, NC 28516, USAen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/87083/1/j.1755-263X.2011.00178.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00178.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceConservation Lettersen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgardy, T. ( 2005 ) Global marine conservation policy versus site‐level: the mismatch of scale and its implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 300, 242 – 248.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCEQ (The White House Council on Environmental Quality). ( 2010 ) Final recommendations of the Interagency Ocean Policy Task Force. July 19. Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/files/documents/OPTF_FinalRecs.pdf. Accessed 2 February 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrowder, L.B., Osherenko G., Young O.R. et al. ( 2006 ) Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance. Science 313, 617 – 618.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDietz, T., Ostrom E., Stern P.C. ( 2003 ) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302, 1907 – 1912.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhler, C., Douvere F. ( 2009 ) Marine spatial planning: a step‐by‐step approach toward ecosystem‐based management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. IOC Manual and Guides, 53, 6, Paris, UNESCO.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceExecutive Order 13547. ( 2010 ) Stewardship of the ocean, our coasts, and the great lakes. President Barack Obama, Office of the Press Secretary. July 19, 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFederal Register Notice 2011–1316. ( 2011 ) National Ocean Council; Development of strategic action plans for the National Policy for the Stewardship of the Ocean, Our Coasts, and the Great Lakes, 4139–4141. January 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeeney, R.G., La Valley K.J., Hall‐Arber M. ( 2010 ) Assessing stakeholder perspectives on the impacts of a decade of collaborative fisheries research in the Gulf of Maine and Georges Bank. Mar Coast Fisher Dyn, Manage, Ecosyst Sci 2, 205 – 216.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrancis, R.C., Little J.E., Bloeser J.A. ( 2009 ) Matching spatial scales of ecology, economy, and management for groundfish of the U.S. West Coast marine ecosystem: a state of the science review. A report to the Lensfest Ocean Program at the Pew Charitable Trusts.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoMC (Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment). ( 2011 ) Available from: http://www.gulfofmaine.org/. Accessed 2 February 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGunderson, D.R., Parma A.M., Hilborn R. et al. ( 2008 ) The challenge of managing nearshore rocky reef resources. Fisheries 33, 172 – 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIzeta, L.M., Wilson D.C. ( 2006 ) The knowledge base for fisheries management. Elsevier, Amsterdam.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJentoft, S. ( 2000 ) Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management. Mar Pol 24, 141 – 148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeslie, H.M., McLeod K.L. ( 2007 ) Confronting the challenges of implementing marine ecosystem‐based management. Front Ecol Environ 5, 540 – 548.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLubchenco, J., Sutley N. ( 2010 ) Policy forum: proposed US policy for ocean, coast and Great Lakes stewardship. Science 328, 1485 – 1486.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLeod, K.L., Leslie H.M. ( 2009 ) Ecosystem‐based management for the oceans. Island Press, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLeod, K.L., Lubchenco J., Palumbi S.R., Rosenberg A.A. ( 2005 ) Scientific consensus statement on marine ecosystem‐based management. Signed by 221 academic scientists and policy experts with relevant expertise and published by the Communication Partnership for Science and the Sea. Available from: http://compassonline.org/?q=EBM. Accessed 1 February 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNRC (National Research Council). ( 2004 ) Cooperative research in the National Marine Fisheries Service. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOstrom, E. ( 1990 ) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWendt, D.E., Starr R.M. ( 2009 ) Collaborative research: an effective way to collect data for stock assessments and evaluate marine protected areas in California. Mar Coast Fisher Dyn, Manage, Ecosyst Sci 1, 315 – 324.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, D.C. ( 1999 ) Fisheries science collaborations: the critical role of the community. Conference on holistic management and the role of fisheries and mariculture in the coastal community, 11–13 November 1999, Tjärnö Marine Biological Laboratory, Sweden.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, J.A. ( 2006 ) Matching social and ecological systems in complex ocean fisheries. Ecol Soc 11, 9 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWondolleck, J.M., Yaffee S.L. ( 2000 ) Making collaboration work. Island Press, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYaffee, S.L., Phillips A., Frentz I., Hardy P., Maleki S., Thorpe B. ( 1996 ) Ecosystem management in the United States: an assessment of current experience. Island Press, Washington, DC.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoung, O.R., Osherenko G., Ekstrom J. et al. ( 2007 ) Solving the crisis in ocean governance: Place‐based management of marine ecosystems. Environment 49, 20 – 32.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1755-263X.2011.00178.x.pdf
Size:
110.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.