Re‐conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century
dc.contributor.author | Chiu, Mei‐hung | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Duit, Reinders | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-11-10T15:38:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-10-01T18:34:45Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2011-08 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Chiu, Mei‐hung ; Duit, Reinders (2011). "Reâ conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48(6): 670-697. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87123> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0022-4308 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1098-2736 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87123 | |
dc.description.abstract | As the context of human life expands from personal to global, a new vision of scientific literacy is needed. Based on a synthesis of the literature and the findings of an online survey of South Korean and US secondary science teachers, we developed a framework for scientific literacy for South Korea that includes five dimensions: content knowledge, habits of mind, character and values, science as a human endeavor, and metacognition, and self‐direction. The framework was validated by international science educators. Although the names of these dimensions sound familiar, the framework puts a new perspective on scientific literacy by expanding and refining each dimension, stressing integrated understanding of big idea and the importance of character and values, adding metacognition, and emphasizing global citizenship. Twenty‐first century citizens need integrated understanding of the big ideas of science and habits of mind such as systematic thinking and communications. They also need to realize that science is a human endeavor that changes, as new evidence is uncovered. However, these aspects of scientific literacy provide only a partial picture. Scientific literacy should also emphasize character and values that can lead learners to make appropriate choices and decisions to ensure a sustainable planet and provide all people with basic human rights. Individuals will also need to develop metacognitive skills in order interpret new complex scientific information and know when they need additional information. Although this framework was developed primarily for South Korea, a new vision of scientific literacy that is applicable for K‐12 has the potential to spur the development of new standards, curriculum materials, instructional practices, professional development and assessments, and dialog across nations. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Inc. J Res Sci Teach 48: 670–697, 2011 | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Scientific Literacy | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Global Citizenship | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Globalization | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Global Scientific Literacy | en_US |
dc.title | Re‐conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Education | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Management | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Science (General) | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Women's and Gender Studies | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Humanities | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | WCU Global Institute for STS Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | WCU Global Institute for STS Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea. | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/87123/1/20424_ftp.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/tea.20424 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Research in Science Teaching | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. ( 2001 ). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12 ( 3 ), 215 – 233. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Aikenhead, G. S. ( 1985 ). Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education, 69 ( 4 ), 453 – 475. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Aikenhead, G. S. ( 2001 ). Renegotiating the culture of school science. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 245 – 264 ). Buckingham: Open University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS].( 1989 ). Project 2061—Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS].( 1993 ). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS].( 2001 ). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS].( 2007 ). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Arons, A. B. ( 1983 ). Achieving wider scientific literacy. Daedalus, 112 ( 2 ), 91 – 122. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Beeth, M. E. ( 1998 ). Teaching for conceptual changes: Using status as a metacognitive tool. Science Education, 82 ( 3 ), 343 – 356. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Berkowitz, M. W., & Simmons, P. ( 2003 ). Integrating science education and character education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 117 – 138 ). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Blank, L. M. ( 2000 ). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? Science Education, 84 ( 4 ), 486 – 506. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. ( 2007 ). The practice of field ecology: Insights for science education. Science Education, 37 ( 2 ), 171 – 187. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. ( 1999 ). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brown, A. L. ( 1987 ). Metacognition, executive control, self‐regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65 – 116 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Brown, A. L., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R., & Campione, J. ( 1983 ). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. III (pp. 77 – 166 ). New York: Wiley. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Bybee, R. W. ( 1997 ). Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Graber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy (pp. 37 – 68 ). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education (IPN). | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Carr, A. ( 2002 ). Grass roots and green tape: Principles and practices of environmental stewardship. Sydney: Federation Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chen, F., Shi, Y., & Xu, F. ( 2009 ). An analysis of the public scientific literacy study in china. Public Understanding of Science, 18 ( 5 ), 607 – 616. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Collins, N.,( 1994 ). Metacognition and reading to learn (on‐line). Available at: http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed376427.html. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Commission of the European Communities.( 2006 ). Adult learning: It is never too late to learn. COM (2006) 614 final. Brussels. Available at: http://eur‐lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2006/com2006_0614en01.pdf. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Conant, J. B. ( 1951 ). Science and common sense. New Haven: Yale University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H., & Yencken, D. ( 1999 ). ‘If it doesn't directly affect you, you don't think about it’: A qualitative study of young people's environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 5 ( 1 ), 96 – 113. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. ( 1999 ). The social responsibility of science and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21 ( 7 ), 775 – 785. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | DeBoer, G. E. ( 2000 ). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 ( 6 ), 582 – 601. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Department of Education and Science.( 2000 ). Learning for life: White paper on adult education. Dublin: Stationery Office. Available at: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1a/c6/5e.pdf. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dewey, J. ( 1910 ). Science as subject matter and as method. Science & Education, 4 ( 4 ), 391 – 398. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Dillenbourg, P. ( 1999 ). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative‐learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1 – 19 ). Oxford: Elsevier. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. ( 1996 ). Young people's images of science. Bristol, PA: Open University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. ( 2000 ). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84 ( 3 ), 287 – 312. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. ( 2007 ). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K‐8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Elmose, S., & Roth, W. M. ( 2005 ). Allgemeinbildung: Readiness for living in risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37 ( 1 ), 11 – 34. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Fischer, G. ( 2000 ). Lifelong learning—More than training. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11 ( 3/4 ), 265 – 294. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Friedman, T. ( 2007 ). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty‐first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Georghiades, P. ( 2004 ). Making pupils' conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26 ( 1 ), 85 – 99. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gilbert, J. ( 2003 ). Science education: Global or national. In J. Gilbert (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in science education (pp. 1 – 12 ). London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor and Francis Group. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gore, A. ( 2006 ). An inconvenient truth. New York: Rodale. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Heisenberg, W. ( 1958 ). The physicist's conception of nature. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hodson, D. ( 2003 ). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25 ( 6 ), 645 – 670. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. ( 2007 ). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 11 ( 3 ), 1347 – 1362. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hurd, P. D. ( 1998 ). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82 ( 3 ), 407 – 416. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Jenkins, E. W. ( 1999 ). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21 ( 7 ), 703 – 710. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kang, I., Park, H., & Baek, K. ( 2008 ). Toward a curricular balance of high school in global age. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26 ( 3 ), 69 – 96. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. ( 2002 ). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 ( 6 ), 522 – 549. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kim, J. ( 2001 ). The characteristics of the 7th national science curriculum of the Republic of Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21 ( 5 ), 1012 – 1026. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kluwe, R. H., & Friedrichsen, G. ( 1985 ). Mechanisms of control and regulation and problem solving. In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control (pp. 203 – 217 ). Berlin: Springer‐Verlag. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Kolstø, S. D. ( 2001 ). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socio‐scientific issues. Science Education, 85 ( 3 ), 291 – 310. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Laugksch, R. C. ( 2000 ). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84 ( 1 ), 71 – 94. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Leahey, T., & Harris, R. ( 1997 ). Learning and cognition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lederman, N. G. ( 1992 ). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 ( 4 ), 331 – 359. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lee, H., & Chang, H. ( 2007 ). The comparison of state‐level U.S. science curricula with science teachers' perception regarding teaching socioscientiifc issues (SSI). The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 10 ( 1 ), 189 – 209. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lee, H., Choi, K., & Chang, H. ( 2006 ). Patterns of college students' moral engagement with socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26 ( 5 ), 646 – 659. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lee, M., Sohn, W., & No, U. ( 2008 ). The result from PISA 2006(RRE 2008‐10). Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. ( 2006 ). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. P. A. Alexander, & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. ( 2nd ed.). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Maitland, L. ( 2000 ). Ideas in practice: Self‐regulation and metacognition in the reading lab. Journal of Developmental Education, 24 ( 2 ), 26 – 32. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P.,( 2008 ) TIMSS 2007 international science report. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Mead, J. M., & Scharmann, L. C. ( 1994 ). Enhancing critical thinking through structured academic controversy. American Biology Teacher, 56 ( 7 ), 416 – 419. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Millar, R. ( 2006 ). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28 ( 13 ), 1499 – 1521. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Millar, R., & Osborne, J. ( 1998 ). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. King's College London: Fulmar Colour Printing Company Limited. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Miller, J. D. ( 1998 ). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7, 203 – 223. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ministry of Education.( 1992 ). The 6th Korea national curriculum standards. Seoul: Daehan Printing and Publishing Co. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ministry of Education.( 1997 ). The 7th Korea national curriculum standards. Seoul: Daehan Printing and Publishing Co. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development [MEHRD].( 2007 ). The revised 7th Korea national curriculum standards in 2007. Seoul: MEHRD. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ministry of Education Science Technology [MEST].( 2009 ). The revised 7th Korea national curriculum standards in 2009. Seoul: MEST. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | National Research Council [NRC].( 1996 ). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | National Research Council [NRC].( 2000 ). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | National Research Council [NRC].( 2005 ). How students learn: Science in the classroom. M. S. Donovan, & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Committee on how people learn, a targeted report for teachers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | National Research Council [NRC].( 2010 ). Conceptual framework for new science education standards. Available at: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Standards_Framework_Homepage.html. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | National Science Board.( 1996 ). Science and engineering indicators 1996. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | National Science Board.( 1998 ). Science and engineering indicators 1998. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. ( 2005 ). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74 ( 1 ), 7 – 28. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. ( 2003 ). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87 ( 2 ), 224 – 240. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Oppenheimer, J. R. ( 1954 ). Science and the common understanding. New York: Simon and Schuster. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Organization for Economic and Co‐operation and Development [OECD].( 2004 ). Scientific literacy. In J. Gilbert (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in science education (pp. 39 – 52 ). London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor and Francis Group. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Organization for Economic and Co‐operation and Development [OECD].( 2005 ). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD].( 2007 ). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world. Paris, France: OECD. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Partnership for the 21st Century Skills [P21].( 2009 ). 21st century skills science map. Tucson, AZ: P21. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pella, M. O., O'Hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. G. ( 1966 ). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 199 – 208. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Rokeach, M. ( 1968 ). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. ( 1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Roseman, J. E. ( 2010 ). Linking textbooks to science. Issue of Better: Evidenced Based Education Learning, 2 ( 3 ), 8 – 11. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Roth, W. M. ( 2003 ). Scientific literacy as an emergent feature of collective human praxis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35 ( 1 ), 9 – 23. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. ( 2004 ). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88 ( 2 ), 263 – 294. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ruiz, P. O., & Vallejos, R. M. ( 1999 ). The role of compassion in moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 28 ( 1 ), 5 – 17. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. ( 1995 ). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychological Review, 7 ( 4 ), 351 – 371. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Schwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., … Krajcik, J. S. ( 2009 ). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 ( 1 ), 232 – 254. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shamos, M. H. ( 1995 ). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shen, B. S. P. ( 1975 ). Science literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44 – 52 ). Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shin, N., Jonassen, H. D., & McGee, S. ( 2003 ). Predictors of well‐structured and ill‐structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 ( 1 ), 7 – 27. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Shin, N., Stevens, S. Y., & Krajcik, J. ( 2011 ). Using construct‐centered design as a systematic approach for tracking student learning over time. London: Taylor & Francis Group. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sinnott, J. D. ( 1989 ). Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications. New York: Praeger. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Smith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. ( 2006 ). Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular. Theory Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 14 ( 1&2 ), 1 – 98. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Smith, G. A., & Williams, D. R. ( 1999 ). Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Solomon, J. ( 1992 ). The classroom discussion of science‐based social issues presented on television: Knowledge, attitudes, and values. International Journal of Science Education, 14 ( 4 ), 431 – 444. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Steinkuehler, C., & Duncan, S. ( 2008 ). Scientific habits of mind in virtual worlds. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17 ( 6 ), 530 – 543. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Stevens, S., Sutherland, L., & Krajcik, J. S. ( 2009 ). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sutherland, L. M., Shin, N., & Krajcik, J. S. ( 2010 ). Exploring the relationship between 21st century competencies and core science content. Paper commissioned by the National Academies. Washington, DC: National Research Council. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Thomas, G. P. ( 2003 ). Conceptualisation, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the metacognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments: The metacognitive orientation learning environment scale‐science (MOLES‐S). Learning Environments Research, 6 ( 2 ), 175 – 197. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Tyler, R. ( 2007 ). Re‐imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Australia: ACER Press, Australian Council for Educational Research, Camberwell, Victoria. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | UNESCO.( 2000 ). Science for the twenty‐first century: A new commitment. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/index.htm. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Voss, J. F., Lawrence, J. A., & Engle, R. A. ( 1991 ). From representation to decision: An analysis of problem solving in international relations. In R. J. Sternberg, & P. A. Frensh (Eds.), Complex problem solving (pp. 119 – 157 ). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wilson, M. R., & Berenthal, M. W. ( 2006 ). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zandvliet, D. ( 2004 ). Developing an ecological framework for environmental education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver BC, Canada | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zeidler, D. L. ( 1997 ). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Educator, 7 ( 1 ), 38 – 46. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. ( 2003 ). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socio‐scientific issues in science education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socio‐scientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 7 – 38 ). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zeidler, D. L., Lederman, N. G., & Taylor, S. C. ( 1992 ). Fallacies and student discourse: Conceptualizing the role of critical thinking in science education. Science Education, 76 ( 4 ), 437 – 450. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. ( 2005 ). Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socio‐scientific issues education. Science Education, 89 ( 3 ), 357 – 377. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., & Ackett, W. A. ( 2002 ). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socio‐scientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86 ( 3 ), 343 – 367. | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.