Show simple item record

Re‐conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century

dc.contributor.authorChiu, Mei‐hungen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuit, Reindersen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-10T15:38:49Z
dc.date.available2012-10-01T18:34:45Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-08en_US
dc.identifier.citationChiu, Mei‐hung ; Duit, Reinders (2011). "Reâ conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48(6): 670-697. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87123>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4308en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-2736en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/87123
dc.description.abstractAs the context of human life expands from personal to global, a new vision of scientific literacy is needed. Based on a synthesis of the literature and the findings of an online survey of South Korean and US secondary science teachers, we developed a framework for scientific literacy for South Korea that includes five dimensions: content knowledge, habits of mind, character and values, science as a human endeavor, and metacognition, and self‐direction. The framework was validated by international science educators. Although the names of these dimensions sound familiar, the framework puts a new perspective on scientific literacy by expanding and refining each dimension, stressing integrated understanding of big idea and the importance of character and values, adding metacognition, and emphasizing global citizenship. Twenty‐first century citizens need integrated understanding of the big ideas of science and habits of mind such as systematic thinking and communications. They also need to realize that science is a human endeavor that changes, as new evidence is uncovered. However, these aspects of scientific literacy provide only a partial picture. Scientific literacy should also emphasize character and values that can lead learners to make appropriate choices and decisions to ensure a sustainable planet and provide all people with basic human rights. Individuals will also need to develop metacognitive skills in order interpret new complex scientific information and know when they need additional information. Although this framework was developed primarily for South Korea, a new vision of scientific literacy that is applicable for K‐12 has the potential to spur the development of new standards, curriculum materials, instructional practices, professional development and assessments, and dialog across nations. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Inc. J Res Sci Teach 48: 670–697, 2011en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherScientific Literacyen_US
dc.subject.otherGlobal Citizenshipen_US
dc.subject.otherGlobalizationen_US
dc.subject.otherGlobal Scientific Literacyen_US
dc.titleRe‐conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st centuryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelWomen's and Gender Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherWCU Global Institute for STS Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Koreaen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherWCU Global Institute for STS Education, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/87123/1/20424_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/tea.20424en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Research in Science Teachingen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbd‐El‐Khalick, F. ( 2001 ). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12 ( 3 ), 215 – 233.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAikenhead, G. S. ( 1985 ). Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education, 69 ( 4 ), 453 – 475.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAikenhead, G. S. ( 2001 ). Renegotiating the culture of school science. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 245 – 264 ). Buckingham: Open University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS].( 1989 ). Project 2061—Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: AAAS.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS].( 1993 ). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS].( 2001 ). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS].( 2007 ). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArons, A. B. ( 1983 ). Achieving wider scientific literacy. Daedalus, 112 ( 2 ), 91 – 122.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeeth, M. E. ( 1998 ). Teaching for conceptual changes: Using status as a metacognitive tool. Science Education, 82 ( 3 ), 343 – 356.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerkowitz, M. W., & Simmons, P. ( 2003 ). Integrating science education and character education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 117 – 138 ). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlank, L. M. ( 2000 ). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? Science Education, 84 ( 4 ), 486 – 506.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. ( 2007 ). The practice of field ecology: Insights for science education. Science Education, 37 ( 2 ), 171 – 187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. ( 1999 ). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, A. L. ( 1987 ). Metacognition, executive control, self‐regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65 – 116 ). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrown, A. L., Bransford, J., Ferrara, R., & Campione, J. ( 1983 ). Learning, remembering, and understanding. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. III (pp. 77 – 166 ). New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBybee, R. W. ( 1997 ). Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Graber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy (pp. 37 – 68 ). Kiel, Germany: Institute for Science Education (IPN).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarr, A. ( 2002 ). Grass roots and green tape: Principles and practices of environmental stewardship. Sydney: Federation Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, F., Shi, Y., & Xu, F. ( 2009 ). An analysis of the public scientific literacy study in china. Public Understanding of Science, 18 ( 5 ), 607 – 616.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollins, N.,( 1994 ). Metacognition and reading to learn (on‐line). Available at: http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed376427.html.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCommission of the European Communities.( 2006 ). Adult learning: It is never too late to learn. COM (2006) 614 final. Brussels. Available at: http://eur‐lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2006/com2006_0614en01.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConant, J. B. ( 1951 ). Science and common sense. New Haven: Yale University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConnell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H., & Yencken, D. ( 1999 ). ‘If it doesn't directly affect you, you don't think about it’: A qualitative study of young people's environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 5 ( 1 ), 96 – 113.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCross, R. T., & Price, R. F. ( 1999 ). The social responsibility of science and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21 ( 7 ), 775 – 785.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeBoer, G. E. ( 2000 ). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 ( 6 ), 582 – 601.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDepartment of Education and Science.( 2000 ). Learning for life: White paper on adult education. Dublin: Stationery Office. Available at: http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1a/c6/5e.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDewey, J. ( 1910 ). Science as subject matter and as method. Science & Education, 4 ( 4 ), 391 – 398.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDillenbourg, P. ( 1999 ). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative‐learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1 – 19 ). Oxford: Elsevier.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDriver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. ( 1996 ). Young people's images of science. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDriver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. ( 2000 ). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84 ( 3 ), 287 – 312.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. ( 2007 ). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K‐8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElmose, S., & Roth, W. M. ( 2005 ). Allgemeinbildung: Readiness for living in risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37 ( 1 ), 11 – 34.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFischer, G. ( 2000 ). Lifelong learning—More than training. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11 ( 3/4 ), 265 – 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedman, T. ( 2007 ). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty‐first century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeorghiades, P. ( 2004 ). Making pupils' conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26 ( 1 ), 85 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilbert, J. ( 2003 ). Science education: Global or national. In J. Gilbert (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in science education (pp. 1 – 12 ). London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor and Francis Group.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGore, A. ( 2006 ). An inconvenient truth. New York: Rodale.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeisenberg, W. ( 1958 ). The physicist's conception of nature. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Co.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHodson, D. ( 2003 ). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25 ( 6 ), 645 – 670.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. ( 2007 ). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 11 ( 3 ), 1347 – 1362.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHurd, P. D. ( 1998 ). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82 ( 3 ), 407 – 416.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJenkins, E. W. ( 1999 ). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21 ( 7 ), 703 – 710.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKang, I., Park, H., & Baek, K. ( 2008 ). Toward a curricular balance of high school in global age. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26 ( 3 ), 69 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. ( 2002 ). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 ( 6 ), 522 – 549.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim, J. ( 2001 ). The characteristics of the 7th national science curriculum of the Republic of Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21 ( 5 ), 1012 – 1026.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKluwe, R. H., & Friedrichsen, G. ( 1985 ). Mechanisms of control and regulation and problem solving. In J. Kuhl, & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control (pp. 203 – 217 ). Berlin: Springer‐Verlag.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolstø, S. D. ( 2001 ). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socio‐scientific issues. Science Education, 85 ( 3 ), 291 – 310.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLaugksch, R. C. ( 2000 ). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84 ( 1 ), 71 – 94.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeahey, T., & Harris, R. ( 1997 ). Learning and cognition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLederman, N. G. ( 1992 ). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29 ( 4 ), 331 – 359.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, H., & Chang, H. ( 2007 ). The comparison of state‐level U.S. science curricula with science teachers' perception regarding teaching socioscientiifc issues (SSI). The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 10 ( 1 ), 189 – 209.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, H., Choi, K., & Chang, H. ( 2006 ). Patterns of college students' moral engagement with socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26 ( 5 ), 646 – 659.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, M., Sohn, W., & No, U. ( 2008 ). The result from PISA 2006(RRE 2008‐10). Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinn, M. C., & Eylon, B. ( 2006 ). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. P. A. Alexander, & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. ( 2nd ed.). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaitland, L. ( 2000 ). Ideas in practice: Self‐regulation and metacognition in the reading lab. Journal of Developmental Education, 24 ( 2 ), 26 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P.,( 2008 ) TIMSS 2007 international science report. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMead, J. M., & Scharmann, L. C. ( 1994 ). Enhancing critical thinking through structured academic controversy. American Biology Teacher, 56 ( 7 ), 416 – 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMillar, R. ( 2006 ). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28 ( 13 ), 1499 – 1521.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMillar, R., & Osborne, J. ( 1998 ). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. King's College London: Fulmar Colour Printing Company Limited.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, J. D. ( 1998 ). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7, 203 – 223.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinistry of Education.( 1992 ). The 6th Korea national curriculum standards. Seoul: Daehan Printing and Publishing Co.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinistry of Education.( 1997 ). The 7th Korea national curriculum standards. Seoul: Daehan Printing and Publishing Co.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinistry of Education and Human Resources Development [MEHRD].( 2007 ). The revised 7th Korea national curriculum standards in 2007. Seoul: MEHRD.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinistry of Education Science Technology [MEST].( 2009 ). The revised 7th Korea national curriculum standards in 2009. Seoul: MEST.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council [NRC].( 1996 ). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council [NRC].( 2000 ). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council [NRC].( 2005 ). How students learn: Science in the classroom. M. S. Donovan, & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), Committee on how people learn, a targeted report for teachers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council [NRC].( 2010 ). Conceptual framework for new science education standards. Available at: http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/Standards_Framework_Homepage.html.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Science Board.( 1996 ). Science and engineering indicators 1996. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Science Board.( 1998 ). Science and engineering indicators 1998. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. ( 2005 ). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74 ( 1 ), 7 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. ( 2003 ). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87 ( 2 ), 224 – 240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOppenheimer, J. R. ( 1954 ). Science and the common understanding. New York: Simon and Schuster.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrganization for Economic and Co‐operation and Development [OECD].( 2004 ). Scientific literacy. In J. Gilbert (Ed.), The RoutledgeFalmer reader in science education (pp. 39 – 52 ). London and New York: RoutledgeFalmer, Taylor and Francis Group.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrganization for Economic and Co‐operation and Development [OECD].( 2005 ). The definition and selection of key competencies: Executive summary. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrganization for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD].( 2007 ). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world. Paris, France: OECD.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePartnership for the 21st Century Skills [P21].( 2009 ). 21st century skills science map. Tucson, AZ: P21.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePella, M. O., O'Hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. G. ( 1966 ). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 199 – 208.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRokeach, M. ( 1968 ). Beliefs, attitudes, and values. ( 1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoseman, J. E. ( 2010 ). Linking textbooks to science. Issue of Better: Evidenced Based Education Learning, 2 ( 3 ), 8 – 11.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth, W. M. ( 2003 ). Scientific literacy as an emergent feature of collective human praxis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35 ( 1 ), 9 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth, W. M., & Lee, S. ( 2004 ). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88 ( 2 ), 263 – 294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuiz, P. O., & Vallejos, R. M. ( 1999 ). The role of compassion in moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 28 ( 1 ), 5 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchraw, G., & Moshman, D. ( 1995 ). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychological Review, 7 ( 4 ), 351 – 371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwarz, C., Reiser, B., Davis, E., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., … Krajcik, J. S. ( 2009 ). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 ( 1 ), 232 – 254.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShamos, M. H. ( 1995 ). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShen, B. S. P. ( 1975 ). Science literacy and the public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44 – 52 ). Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShin, N., Jonassen, H. D., & McGee, S. ( 2003 ). Predictors of well‐structured and ill‐structured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40 ( 1 ), 7 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShin, N., Stevens, S. Y., & Krajcik, J. ( 2011 ). Using construct‐centered design as a systematic approach for tracking student learning over time. London: Taylor & Francis Group.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinnott, J. D. ( 1989 ). Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications. New York: Praeger.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, C. L., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. ( 2006 ). Implications of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular. Theory Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 14 ( 1&2 ), 1 – 98.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, G. A., & Williams, D. R. ( 1999 ). Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSolomon, J. ( 1992 ). The classroom discussion of science‐based social issues presented on television: Knowledge, attitudes, and values. International Journal of Science Education, 14 ( 4 ), 431 – 444.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteinkuehler, C., & Duncan, S. ( 2008 ). Scientific habits of mind in virtual worlds. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17 ( 6 ), 530 – 543.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevens, S., Sutherland, L., & Krajcik, J. S. ( 2009 ). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSutherland, L. M., Shin, N., & Krajcik, J. S. ( 2010 ). Exploring the relationship between 21st century competencies and core science content. Paper commissioned by the National Academies. Washington, DC: National Research Council.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas, G. P. ( 2003 ). Conceptualisation, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the metacognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments: The metacognitive orientation learning environment scale‐science (MOLES‐S). Learning Environments Research, 6 ( 2 ), 175 – 197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTyler, R. ( 2007 ). Re‐imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Australia: ACER Press, Australian Council for Educational Research, Camberwell, Victoria.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUNESCO.( 2000 ). Science for the twenty‐first century: A new commitment. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/science/wcs/index.htm.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoss, J. F., Lawrence, J. A., & Engle, R. A. ( 1991 ). From representation to decision: An analysis of problem solving in international relations. In R. J. Sternberg, & P. A. Frensh (Eds.), Complex problem solving (pp. 119 – 157 ). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson, M. R., & Berenthal, M. W. ( 2006 ). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZandvliet, D. ( 2004 ). Developing an ecological framework for environmental education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Vancouver BC, Canadaen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZeidler, D. L. ( 1997 ). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Educator, 7 ( 1 ), 38 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. ( 2003 ). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socio‐scientific issues in science education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socio‐scientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 7 – 38 ). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZeidler, D. L., Lederman, N. G., & Taylor, S. C. ( 1992 ). Fallacies and student discourse: Conceptualizing the role of critical thinking in science education. Science Education, 76 ( 4 ), 437 – 450.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. ( 2005 ). Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socio‐scientific issues education. Science Education, 89 ( 3 ), 357 – 377.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., & Ackett, W. A. ( 2002 ). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socio‐scientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86 ( 3 ), 343 – 367.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.