Show simple item record

Organ quality and quality of life after liver transplantation

dc.contributor.authorVolk, Michael L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHagan, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-05T18:32:19Z
dc.date.available2013-02-01T20:26:17Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-12en_US
dc.identifier.citationVolk, Michael L.; Hagan, Michael (2011). "Organ quality and quality of life after liver transplantation ." Liver Transplantation 17(12): 1443-1447. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/88022>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6465en_US
dc.identifier.issn1527-6473en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/88022
dc.description.abstractNot only is there a limited supply of organs for liver transplantation, but the quality of the available organs is not uniform. Risk factors such as donor age and cause of death are known to predict graft failure, but their impact on the recipient's quality of life (QOL) has not been reported. We sent a QOL survey to 299 adults at our institution who had received a liver transplant 1 to 7 years before the study. For the 171 patients (57%) who completed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF‐36), the mean Physical Composite Score (PCS) and the mean Mental Composite Score (MCS) were 61 and 66, respectively; the highest scores were for the Social Functioning subscale, and the lowest scores were for the Role Functioning/Physical and Energy/Fatigue subscales. The mean donor risk index (DRI) of the organs that the subjects received was 1.4 (range = 0.8‐2.4). There was no correlation between the SF‐36 scores and the DRI [there were changes of −4.8 and −2.8 in the PCS and MCS per unit increase in the DRI ( P = 0.4 and 0.6, respectively)], even though we controlled for potential confounders such as age, sex, hospitalization before transplantation, the Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score at transplantation, years since transplantation, previous transplantation, and the Charlson comorbidity index. In conclusion, we found no association between organ quality and QOL after liver transplantation. If this finding is confirmed in prospective, multicenter studies, it will be useful in counseling patients about the decision to accept or not accept high‐risk organ offers. Liver Transpl, 2011. © 2011 AASLD.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.titleOrgan quality and quality of life after liver transplantationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Health System, 300 North Ingalls Street, Room 7C27, Ann Arbor, MI 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherGift of Life Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21898767en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/88022/1/22425_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/lt.22425en_US
dc.identifier.sourceLiver Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKung HC, Hoyert DL, Xu J, Murphy SL. Deaths: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2008; 56: 1 ‐ 120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRatcliffe J, Longworth L, Young T, Bryan S, Burroughs A, Buxton M; for Cost‐Effectiveness of Liver Transplantation Team. Assessing health‐related quality of life pre‐ and post‐liver transplantation: a prospective multicenter study. Liver Transpl 2002; 8: 263 ‐ 270.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMerion RM, Schaubel DE, Dykstra DM, Freeman RB, Port FK, Wolfe RA. The survival benefit of liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 307 ‐ 313.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeng S, Goodrich NP, Bragg‐Gresham JL, Dykstra DM, Punch JD, DebRoy MA, et al. Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 783 ‐ 790.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaab S, Ng V, Landaverde C, Lee SJ, Comulada WS, Arevalo J, et al. Development of a disease‐specific questionnaire to measure health‐related quality of life in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl 2011; 17: 567 ‐ 579.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolk ML, Lok AS, Pelletier SJ, Ubel PA, Hayward RA. Impact of the Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease allocation policy on the use of high‐risk organs for liver transplantation. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1568 ‐ 1574.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubel DE, Sima CS, Goodrich NP, Feng S, Merion RM. The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 419 ‐ 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD‐9‐CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 613 ‐ 619.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLongworth L, Bryan S. An empirical comparison of EQ‐5D and SF‐6D in liver transplant patients. Health Econ 2003; 12: 1061 ‐ 1067.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWare JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36‐item short‐form health survey (SF‐36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473 ‐ 483.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVolk ML, Reichert HA, Lok AS, Hayward RA. Variation in organ quality between liver transplant centers. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 958 ‐ 964.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBryan S, Ratcliffe J, Neuberger JM, Burroughs AK, Gunson BK, Buxton MJ. Health‐related quality of life following liver transplantation. Qual Life Res 1998; 7: 115 ‐ 120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKosinski M, Zhao SZ, Dedhiya S, Osterhaus JT, Ware JE Jr. Determining minimally important changes in generic and disease‐specific health‐related quality of life questionnaires in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2000; 43: 1478 ‐ 1487.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.