Show simple item record

The right organ for the right recipient: the Ninth Annual American Society of Transplant Surgeons’ State‐of‐the‐Art Winter Symposium

dc.contributor.authorSung, Randall S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAbt, Peter L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Dev M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGarvey, Catherine A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSegev, Dorry L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKaufman, Dixon B.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-05T22:06:16Z
dc.date.available2013-01-02T16:31:58Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-11en_US
dc.identifier.citationSung, Randall S.; Abt, Peter L.; Desai, Dev M.; Garvey, Catherine A.; Segev, Dorry L.; Kaufman, Dixon B. (2011). "The right organ for the right recipient: the Ninth Annual American Society of Transplant Surgeons’ State‐of‐the‐Art Winter Symposium." Clinical Transplantation 25(6): E592-E598. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89513>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0902-0063en_US
dc.identifier.issn1399-0012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89513
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan Allocationen_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan Donationen_US
dc.subject.otherOrgan Transplantationen_US
dc.subject.otherRecipient Selectionen_US
dc.subject.otherTransplant Surgeryen_US
dc.titleThe right organ for the right recipient: the Ninth Annual American Society of Transplant Surgeons’ State‐of‐the‐Art Winter Symposiumen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TXen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherThe Transplant Center, University of Minnesota Medical Center‐Fairview, Minneapolis, MNen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MDen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21906173en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89513/1/j.1399-0012.2011.01513.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01513.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceClinical Transplantationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKucirka LM, Namuyinga R, Hanrahan C, Montgomery RA, Segev DL. Formal policies and special informed consent are associated with higher provider utilization of CDC high‐risk donor organs. Am J Transplant 2009: 9: 629.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrady D. Patients contract 2 viruses from donor in transplants. New York Times November 14, 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatel AM, Pancoska A, Mulgaonkar S, Weng FL. Renal transplantation in patients with pre‐transplant donor‐specific antibodies and negative flow cytometry crossmatches. Am J Transplant 2007: 7: 2371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurns JM, Cornell LD, Perry DK et al. Alloantibody levels and acute humoral rejection early after positive crossmatch kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2008: 8: 2684.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSegev DL, Gentry SE, Warren DS, Reeb B, Montgomery RA. Kidney paired donation and optimizing the use of live donor organs. JAMA 2005: 293: 1883.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMontgomery RA, Zachary AA, Ratner LE et al. Clinical results from transplanting incompatible live kidney donor/recipient pairs using kidney paired donation. JAMA 2005: 294: 1655.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis CL, Feng S, Sung R et al. Simultaneous liver‐kidney transplantation: evaluation to decision making. Am J Transplant 2007: 7: 1702.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRuiz R, Barri YM, Jennings LW et al. Hepatorenal syndrome: a proposal for kidney after liver transplantation (KALT). Liver Transpl 2007: 13: 838.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampbell MC, Kotlyar DS, Brensinger CM et al. Renal function after orthotopic liver transplantation is predicted by duration of pretransplantation creatinine elevation. Liver Transpl 2005: 11: 1048.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreussner R, Sutherland D, Gruessner AC. Mortality assessment for pancreas transplants. Am J Transplant 2004: 4: 2018.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSegev DL, Kucirka LM, Nguyen GC et al. Effect modification in liver allografts with prolonged cold ischemic time. Am J Transplant 2008: 8: 658.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSegev DL, Maley WR, Simpkins CE et al. Minimizing risk associated with elderly liver donors by matching to preferred recipients. Hepatology 2007: 46: 1907.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchaubel DE, Sima CS, Goodrich NP et al. The survival benefit of deceased donor liver transplantation as a function of candidate disease severity and donor quality. Am J Transplant 2008: 8: 419.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbt PL, Desai NM, Crawford MD et al. Survival following liver transplantation from non‐heart beating donors. Ann Surg 2004: 239: 87.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee KW, Simpkins CE, Montgomery RA, Locke JE, Segev DL, Maley WR. Factors affecting graft survival after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors. Transplantation 2006: 82: 1683.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.