Show simple item record

Validation of a new multiplex assay against individual immunoassays for the quantification of reproductive, stress, and energetic metabolism biomarkers in urine specimens

dc.contributor.authorSalvante, Katrina G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrindle, Eleanoren_US
dc.contributor.authorMcconnell, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorO'connor, Kathleenen_US
dc.contributor.authorNepomnaschy, Pablo A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-05T22:06:36Z
dc.date.available2013-03-04T15:29:55Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationSalvante, Katrina G.; Brindle, Eleanor; Mcconnell, Daniel; O'connor, Kathleen; Nepomnaschy, Pablo A. (2012). "Validation of a new multiplex assay against individual immunoassays for the quantification of reproductive, stress, and energetic metabolism biomarkers in urine specimens." American Journal of Human Biology 24(1): 81-86. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89528>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1042-0533en_US
dc.identifier.issn1520-6300en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89528
dc.description.abstractAbstract:  Measuring multiple hormones simultaneously in a single assay saves sample volume, labor, time, reagents, money, and consumables. Thus, multiplex arrays represent a faster, more economically and ecologically sound alternative to singleton assays. Objectives:  To validate a new, commercially available multiplex female array produced by Quansys Biosciences against individual immunoassays for the quantification of six hormones in urine samples from women in different reproductive stages. Methods:  Urine samples were analyzed using the new Quansys multiplex female hormone array and compared with well‐established individual immunoassays for adiponectin, free cortisol, c‐peptide, estrone‐3‐glucuronide (E 1 G), follicle stimulating hormone beta‐subunit (FSH‐beta), and human chorionic gonadotropin beta‐subunit (hCG‐beta). Correlations between assays were assessed using Pearson correlation, linear regression and Bland–Altman analysis. The temporal profiles of free cortisol, E1G, FSH‐beta, and hCG‐beta were also compared. Results:  The multiplex array was highly correlated with the individual immunoassays for five of the tested hormones (Pearson's correlation coefficient ≥0.75), and yielded temporal patterns of hormone profiles consistent with the individual immunoassays for free cortisol, E1G, FSH‐beta, and hCG‐beta. Conclusions:   The Quansys multiplex female hormone array is a valid alternative method to individual immunoassays for the quantification of stress, reproductive and energetic hormones and metabolites in human urine samples and can be used to examine the dynamic interactions between these hormones. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.titleValidation of a new multiplex assay against individual immunoassays for the quantification of reproductive, stress, and energetic metabolism biomarkers in urine specimensen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumReproductive Sciences Program, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Epidemiology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCenter for Studies in Demography and Ecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherHuman Evolutionary Studies Program, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Blusson Hall 9417, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, British Columbia, V5A 1S6, Canadaen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22121074en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89528/1/21229_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ajhb.21229en_US
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Human Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBland JM, Altman DG. 1999. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Meth Med Res 8: 135 – 160.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrindle E, Miller RC, Shofer JB, Klein NA, Soules MR, O'Connor KA. 2006. Urinary beta‐luteinizing hormones and beta‐follicle stimulating hormone immunoenzymometric assays for population research. Clin Biochem 39: 1071 – 1079.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNepomnaschy PA, Lee TCK, Zeng L, Dean CB. Using first morning cortisol levels to compare physiologic stress levels between individuals: Ranking methods and sample sizes. Submitted to Am J Hum Biol (under review).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNepomnaschy PA, Welch KB, McConnell DS, Low BS, Strassmann BI, England BG. 2006. Cortisol levels and very early pregnancy loss in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 3938 – 3942.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNepomnaschy PA, Welch K, McConnell D, Strassmann BI, England BG. 2004. Stress and female reproductive function: a study of daily variations in cortisol, gonadotrophins, and gonadal steroids in a rural Mayan population. Am J Hum Biol 16: 523 – 532.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor KA, Brindle E, Shofer JB, Miller RC, Klein NA, Soules MR, Campbell KL, Mar C, Handcock MS. 2004. Statistical correction for non‐parallelism in a urinary enzyme immunoassay. J Immunoassay Immunochem 25: 259 – 278.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSantoro N, Crawford SL, Allsworth JE, Gold EB, Greendale GA, Korenman S, Lasley BL, McConnell D, McGaffigan P, Midgely R, Schocken M, Sowers M, Weiss G. 2003. Assessing menstrual cycles with urinary hormone assays. Am J Phys Endocrinol Metab 284: E521 – E530.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.