Show simple item record

Pilot study of duloxetine for treatment of aromatase inhibitor‐associated musculoskeletal symptoms

dc.contributor.authorHenry, N. Lynnen_US
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Mousumien_US
dc.contributor.authorWicha, Max S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVan Poznak, Catherineen_US
dc.contributor.authorSmerage, Jeffrey B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSchott, Anne F.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGriggs, Jennifer J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHayes, Daniel F.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-05T22:06:38Z
dc.date.available2013-02-01T20:26:14Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-12-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationHenry, N. Lynn; Banerjee, Mousumi; Wicha, Max; Van Poznak, Catherine; Smerage, Jeffrey B.; Schott, Anne F.; Griggs, Jennifer J.; Hayes, Daniel F. (2011). "Pilot study of duloxetine for treatment of aromatase inhibitor‐associated musculoskeletal symptoms ." Cancer 117(24): 5469-5475. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89530>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89530
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor‐positive early stage breast cancer treated with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) develop musculoskeletal symptoms. Standard analgesics are relatively ineffective. Duloxetine is a serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with proven efficacy for treatment of multiple chronic pain states. The authors investigated the hypothesis that duloxetine is efficacious for treatment of AI‐associated musculoskeletal symptoms. METHODS: The authors performed a single‐arm, open‐label phase 2 study of duloxetine in postmenopausal women with breast cancer who developed new or worsening pain after treatment with an AI for at least 2 weeks. Patients were treated with duloxetine for 8 weeks (30 mg for 7 days, then 60 mg daily). The primary endpoint was a 30% decrease in average pain score over 8 weeks, and secondary outcomes included change in average and worst pain, pain interference, depression, sleep quality, and hot flashes. Statistical analysis was done with t tests for paired data. RESULTS: Twenty‐one of 29 evaluable patients (72.4%) achieved at least a 30% decrease in average pain, and 18 of 23 patients (78.3%) who completed protocol‐directed treatment continued duloxetine. The mean percentage reduction in average pain severity between baseline and 8 weeks was 60.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.6%‐73.1%), and in maximum pain severity it was 59.9% (95% CI, 47.0‐72.7%). The most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2 fatigue, xerostomia, nausea, and headache. CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine appears to be effective and well tolerated for treatment of AI‐associated musculoskeletal symptoms. Future randomized, placebo‐controlled studies are warranted. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society. Bothersome musculoskeletal symptoms affect about half of women with early stage breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors. In this pilot clinical trial, treatment with duloxetine appeared to significantly improve pain and functioning, and was relatively well tolerated.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherBreast Canceren_US
dc.subject.otherAromatase Inhibitoren_US
dc.subject.otherArthralgiaen_US
dc.subject.otherDuloxetineen_US
dc.subject.otherSerotonin‐Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitoren_US
dc.titlePilot study of duloxetine for treatment of aromatase inhibitor‐associated musculoskeletal symptomsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBreast Oncology Program, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationother1500 East Medical Center Drive, Med Inn Building C450, Ann Arbor, MI 48109‐5843en_US
dc.identifier.pmid21692065en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89530/1/26230_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.26230en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurstein HJ, Prestrud AA, Seidenfeld J, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline: update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor‐positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 3784 ‐ 3796.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiner EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on the use of aromatase inhibitors as adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor‐positive breast cancer: status report 2004. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23: 619 ‐ 629.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenry NL, Giles JT, Ang D, et al. Prospective characterization of musculoskeletal symptoms in early stage breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008; 111: 365 ‐ 372.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenry NL, Giles JT, Stearns V. Aromatase inhibitor‐associated musculoskeletal symptoms: etiology and strategies for management. Oncology. 2008; 22: 1401 ‐ 1408.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLintermans A, Van Calster B, Van Hoydonck M, et al. Aromatase inhibitor‐induced loss of grip strength is body mass index dependent: hypothesis‐generating findings for its pathogenesis. Ann Oncol. [published online ahead of print January 27, 2011.]en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrew KD, Greenlee H, Capodice J, et al. Prevalence of joint symptoms in postmenopausal women taking aromatase inhibitors for early‐stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25: 3877 ‐ 3883.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrew KD, Capodice J, Greenlee H, et al. Randomized, blinded, sham‐controlled trial of acupuncture for the management of aromatase inhibitor‐associated joint symptoms in women with early‐stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 1154 ‐ 1160.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoldstein DJ, Lu Y, Detke MJ, Wiltse C, Mallinckrodt C, Demitrack MA. Duloxetine in the treatment of depression: a double‐blind placebo‐controlled comparison with paroxetine. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2004; 24: 389 ‐ 399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChappell AS, Ossanna MJ, Liu‐Seifert H, et al. Duloxetine, a centrally acting analgesic, in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis knee pain: A 13‐week, randomized, placebo‐controlled trial. Pain. 2009; 146: 253 ‐ 260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePritchett YL, McCarberg BH, Watkin JG, Robinson MJ. Duloxetine for the management of diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: response profile. Pain Med. 2007; 8: 397 ‐ 409.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkljarevski V, Desaiah D, Liu‐Seifert H, et al. Efficacy and safety of duloxetine in patients with chronic low back pain. Spine. 2010; 35: E578 ‐ E585.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArnold LM, Pritchett YL, D'Souza DN, Kajdasz DK, Iyengar S, Wernicke JF. Duloxetine for the treatment of fibromyalgia in women: pooled results from 2 randomized, placebo‐controlled clinical trials. J Womens Health. 2007; 16: 1145 ‐ 1156.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoffe H, Soares CN, Petrillo LF, et al. Treatment of depression and menopause‐related symptoms with the serotonin‐norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor duloxetine. J Clin Psychiatry. 2007; 68: 943 ‐ 950.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChalon S, Pereira A, Lainey E, et al. Comparative effects of duloxetine and desipramine on sleep EEG in healthy subjects. Psychopharmacology. 2005; 177: 357 ‐ 365.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaut RL, Cleeland CS, Flanery RC. Development of the Wisconsin Brief Pain Questionnaire to assess pain in cancer and other diseases. Pain. 1983; 17: 197 ‐ 210.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruce B, Fries JF. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire: a review of its history, issues, progress, and documentation. J Rheumatol. 2003; 30: 167 ‐ 178.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter JS, Andrykowski MA, Wilson J, et al. Psychometrics for 2 short forms of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies‐Depression Scale. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 1998; 19: 481 ‐ 494.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHilditch JR, Lewis J, Peter A, et al. A menopause‐specific quality of life questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Maturitas. 1996; 24: 161 ‐ 175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter JS. The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale: a tool for assessing the impact of hot flashes on quality of life following breast cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001; 22: 979 ‐ 989.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuysse DJ, Reynolds CF III, Monk TH, Hoch CC, Yeager AL, Kupfer DJ. Quantification of subjective sleep quality in healthy elderly men and women using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Sleep. 1991; 14: 331 ‐ 338.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarpenter JS, Andrykowski MA. Psychometric evaluation of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. J Psychosom Res. 1998; 45: 5 ‐ 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J Pain. 2008; 9: 105 ‐ 121.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrannan SK, Mallinckrodt CH, Brown EB, Wohlreich MM, Watkin JG, Schatzberg AF. Duloxetine 60 mg once‐daily in the treatment of painful physical symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2005; 39: 43 ‐ 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTittle MB, McMillan SC, Hagan S. Validating the brief pain inventory for use with surgical patients with cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2003; 30: 325 ‐ 330.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrimm SW, Dyroff MC. Inhibition of human drug metabolizing cytochromes P450 by anastrozole, a potent and selective inhibitor of aromatase. Drug Metab Dispos. 1997; 25: 598 ‐ 602.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoprinzi CL, Qin R, Balcueva EP, et al. Phase III, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled evaluation of pregabalin for alleviating hot flashes, N07C1. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28: 641 ‐ 647.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.