Default Settings in Defined Contribution Plans – a Comparative Approach to Fiduciary Obligation and the Role of Markets
dc.contributor.author | Muir, Dana M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-01-12T13:38:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-01-12T13:38:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-01 | |
dc.identifier | 1168 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89594 | |
dc.description.abstract | Both the United States and Australia have increased the use of default settings in defined contribution (DC) plans such as 401(k)s. However, policy makers in the two countries have taken different approaches to important aspects of default investment products. This article discusses the regulation of those default investment products particularly regarding the assignment of fiduciary responsibility. It concludes that Australia’s approach offers two lessons for the U.S. First, disclosure to and education of participants who are defaulted into investment products appears to be of limited value to those participants. Second, to the extent possible, the locus of fiduciary responsibility for default investment products should be on those who are expert on and manage those products. | en_US |
dc.subject | defined contribution | en_US |
dc.subject | pension | en_US |
dc.subject | fiduciary | en_US |
dc.subject | automatic enrollment | en_US |
dc.subject | qualified default investment alternatives | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Law, History, Communication | en_US |
dc.title | Default Settings in Defined Contribution Plans – a Comparative Approach to Fiduciary Obligation and the Role of Markets | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Economics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Ross School of Business | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89594/1/1168_Muir.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Business, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.