Show simple item record

Evaluation of 2009 New York Crash Data Reported to the MCMIS Crash File

dc.contributor.authorBlower, Daniel Fredericken_US
dc.contributor.authorMatteson, Anneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-13T15:52:12Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2012-01-13T15:52:12Z
dc.date.issued2011-09
dc.identifier102794en_US
dc.identifier.otherUMTRI-2011-42en_US
dc.identifier.otherDTMC75-06-H-00003en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89602
dc.description.abstractThis report is part of a series evaluating the data reported to the Motor Carrier Management Information System (MCMIS) Crash File undertaken by the Center for National Truck and Bus Statistics at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. The earlier studies showed that reporting to the MCMIS Crash File was incomplete. This report examines the factors that are associated with reporting rates for the State of New York. MCMIS Crash File records were matched to the New York crash file to determine the nature and extent of underreporting. Because all levels of the MCMIS crash file reporting criteria could not be applied, the evaluation of reporting completeness was restricted to crashes that involved either a fatality or an injury transported for immediate medical attention. Of these crashes, an estimated 36.7 percent were properly reported. Reporting rates were found to be related to crash severity and the configuration of the vehicle. Over 82 percent of fatal crash involvements were reported, but only 34.6 percent of injury/transported involvements. Crashes in which a vehicle was towed due to disabling damage could not be identified in the New York crash data supplied, so reporting rates for that subset cannot be estimated. Trucks were reported at a slightly higher rate than buses. Large trucks, especially truck tractors, were reported at a higher rate than smaller trucks. Missing data rates are low for most variables. Corresponding data elements in the MCMIS and New York crash files were quite consistent, though specific problems were noted with respect to one truck configuration. The timeliness of reporting was good, with about 91 percent of records submitted to the MCMIS file within 90 days of the crash.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFederal Motor Carrier Safety Administrationen_US
dc.format.extent42en_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Instituteen_US
dc.subject.otherTrucksen_US
dc.subject.otherBusesen_US
dc.subject.otherAccident Dataen_US
dc.subject.otherAccident Reportsen_US
dc.subject.otherPolice Reportsen_US
dc.subject.otherDatabasesen_US
dc.subject.otherNew Yorken_US
dc.titleEvaluation of 2009 New York Crash Data Reported to the MCMIS Crash Fileen_US
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of 2009 New York Crash Data Reported to the Motor Carrier Management Information System Crash Fileen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineering
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89602/1/102794.pdf
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.