Show simple item record

On Morals, Fictions, and Genres.

dc.contributor.authorLiao, Shen-yien_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-26T20:01:36Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2012-01-26T20:01:36Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89667
dc.description.abstractAs audiences, we interact with fictions in many ways: we evaluate their artistic worth, we imagine the scenarios that they describe, we emotionally respond to the characters in them, and we draw from them lessons that apply to our lives. As theorists, we want explanations of our interactions with fictions to have two qualities. We want explanations to be specific enough to acknowledge the diversity of fictions, to attend to the differences amongst them, and to account for their peculiarities. We also want explanations to be general enough to extrapolate from individual works, to illuminate interesting patterns, and to endow us with theoretical understanding. Genre explanations have both specificity and generality. As sensible groupings of fictions, genres mark relevant boundaries in the landscape of diverse fictions. My dissertation argues that genre is central to explaining phenomena that arise from our interactions with fictions. Chapter 1 introduces and addresses two intuitive challenges to genre explanations that question their robustness and informativeness. Chapter 2 brings out genre's role in explaining imaginative resistance. Imaginative resistance occurs when certain propositions, such as morally-disagreeable claims, are presented in fictions and people resist imagining them and accepting them as true in the fiction. Genre gives us an understanding of why certain propositions evoke imaginative resistance when they are presented in some fictions but do not evoke imaginative resistance when they are presented in other fictions. Chapter 3 uses methods of cognitive science to empirically vindicate the theoretical account developed in the previous chapter. Since genre is low in psychological salience, its role in generating imaginative resistance may be more readily and persuasively demonstrated by empirical means. Chapter 4 brings out genre's role in explaining moral persuasion. Genre gives us an understanding of how different fictions educate or corrupt us in different ways.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectImaginationen_US
dc.subjectGenreen_US
dc.subjectFictionen_US
dc.subjectAestheticsen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Scienceen_US
dc.subjectExperimental Philosophyen_US
dc.titleOn Morals, Fictions, and Genres.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplinePhilosophyen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberWalton, Kendall L.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberJacobson, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberPaulson, Sarah Bussen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberSripada, Sekhar Chandraen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89667/1/samliao_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.