Collaborative Help for Individualized Problems: Learning from the MythTV User Community and Diabetes Patient Support Groups.
dc.contributor.author | Huh, Jina | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-01-26T20:05:23Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2012-01-26T20:05:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | 2011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89774 | |
dc.description.abstract | As information technology increasingly becomes part of everyday life, new opportunities arise for aggregating people’s experiences and knowledge. Collaborative help can utilize collective experience and knowledge to benefit everyday problem solving activities. However, current help systems often limit their focus to common and active problems (e.g., Frequently Asked Questions), making it difficult for users to find answers to the problems that are uncommon and individualized. In my dissertation, I address how individualized problems can be better supported through collaborative help. My dissertation contributes to existing conversations around collaborative help, especially challenges in information reuse and contextualization. I further expand discussions around the role of temporal information during expertise sharing for finding solutions to individualized problems. In order to study this, I examined two research sites using an interpretivist approach (Strauss & Corbin, 1990): the MythTV user community and diabetes patient support groups. Because problems are often individualized for members of both communities, these sites serve as excellent places to examine the research problem. I discuss three key findings that are critical for understanding how individualized problems are solved in community-based collaborative help systems. First, operationalizing experiences is critical for sharing executable solutions and context. Operationalized experiences are not only about the objectification and easy transfer of tacit knowledge (Ambrosini & Bowman, 2002), but generate knowledge that can be directly re-used. Second, operationalization process inevitably fails to capture practices “simultaneously embedded in various processes” (Ackerman & Halverson, 2000) during maintenance activities, be it maintaining MythTV or diabetes. However, the breakdown of operationalization process helps each community member learn how to manage individualized situations as they occur. Lastly, operationalization process needs to take place within the larger context of sharing trajectories. By comparing, aligning, and collaging pieces of individual trajectories, community members collectively expand their knowledge about managing MythTV or diabetes over time. Through continual sharing of maintenance trajectories, members reduce uncertainty about the future, take preventative actions, and reflect on the past to revise their practices. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Collaborative Help for Individualized Problems | en_US |
dc.title | Collaborative Help for Individualized Problems: Learning from the MythTV User Community and Diabetes Patient Support Groups. | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | PhD | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Information | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Ackerman, Mark Steven | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Fishman, Barry Jay | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Newman, Mark W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Teasley, Stephanie | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Zheng, Kai | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Information and Library Science | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89774/1/jinah_1.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.