Show simple item record

Social Performances: A Sociotechnical Framework for Understanding Online Prosocial Behavior.

dc.contributor.authorYew, Jude Choon Loongen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-26T20:06:41Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2012-01-26T20:06:41Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.date.submitteden_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/89805
dc.description.abstractProsocial behavior describes actions, such as sharing and cooperation, intended to benefit others. In particular, the popular online activity of remixing, is especially dependent upon individuals to willingly share content that they have created for others to reuse and even profit from. However, what motivates these individuals to share their creations with relative strangers when there is no clear benefit to themselves? This dissertation presents an explanatory framework that helps to explain online prosociality through two main observations: 1) That these online content sharing environments afford social transparency by providing a view of all users and activity on the system through visualizations and displays. 2) That this socially transparent space enables the development of social currencies (or group scripts/norms) which encourage prosocial behavior in the system. The overall goal for the social performance framework is to provide an understanding of the prosocial sharing and, at the same time, be used to inform the design of systems that encourage this behavior. I apply this framework to a two-part study of prosocial sharing motivations in an online music remixing community, ccMixter. The first part of the study utilizes social network analysis to characterize and describe the dynamics of music sharing in the community. One of the findings is that a core group of members are responsible for much of the sharing and remixing activity in the community. In the second part of this study, I interview twenty-four members from this core group to investigate their motivations for prosocial behavior in ccMixter. A key finding was that these members were motivated to contribute and share because of the influence of group norms made socially transparent by the website. This study of ccMixter represents a first test of the analytical capability of the social performance framework. In general, the framework performed well, surfacing the joint influence of community norms and the affordance of the website on prosocial sharing. To further strengthen the explanatory power of the framework, future studies will seek to apply the framework to other online content sharing communities.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectMotivations for User-generated Content Sharing and Remixing on the Interneten_US
dc.subjectOnline Prosocial Sharing of User-generated Contenten_US
dc.subjectTheoretical Framework Accounting for Sociotechnical Factors That Motivate Digital Content Sharing and Remixingen_US
dc.subjectDesign Implications for Online Environments That Encourage Participation, Cooperation and Sharingen_US
dc.titleSocial Performances: A Sociotechnical Framework for Understanding Online Prosocial Behavior.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineInformationen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studiesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberTeasley, Stephanieen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCampbell, Scott Walkeren_US
dc.contributor.committeememberCohen, Michael D.en_US
dc.contributor.committeememberJackson, Stevenen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCommunicationsen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/89805/1/jyew_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.