View Item 

Show simple item record

Competitors and Cooperators: A Micro‐Level Analysis of Regional Economic Development Collaboration Networks

dc.contributor.authorLee, In‐wonen_US
dc.contributor.authorFeiock, Richard C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, Youngmien_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-16T15:53:04Z
dc.date.available2013-05-01T17:24:42Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationLee, In‐won ; Feiock, Richard C.; Lee, Youngmi (2012). "Competitors and Cooperators: A Microâ Level Analysis of Regional Economic Development Collaboration Networks." Public Administration Review 72(2). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90044>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0033-3352en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-6210en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90044
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleCompetitors and Cooperators: A Micro‐Level Analysis of Regional Economic Development Collaboration Networksen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelGovernment, Politics and Lawen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFlorida State Universityen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDankook Universityen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90044/1/j.1540-6210.2011.02501.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02501.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourcePublic Administration Reviewen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNieman, Max, Gregory Andranovich, and Kenneth Fernandez. 2000. Local Economic Development in Southern California’s Suburbs: 1990–1997. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, In Won, Richard C. Feiock, and Hyung Jun Park. 2011. Competition and Cooperative Networks in Local Economic Development: An Exponential Random Graph Analysis. Working paper.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLubell, Mark. 2007. Familiarity Breeds Trust: Collective Action in a Policy Domain. Journal of Politics 69 ( 1 ): 237 – 50.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLubell, Mark., Mark Schneider, John Scholz, and Mihriye Mete. 2002. Watershed Partnerships and the Emergence of Collective Action Institutions. American Journal of Political Science 46 ( 1 ): 148 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGinnis, Michael Dean. 1999. Polycentricity and Local Public Economies: Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeier, Kenneth J., and Laurence J. O’Toole, Jr. 2002. Public Management and Organizational Performance: The Impact of Managerial Quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 21 ( 4 ): 629 – 43.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMilward, H. Brinton. 1996. Symposium on the Hollow State: Control and Performance in Interorganizational Settings. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 6 ( 2 ): 193 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNice, David C. 1987. Federalism: The Politics of Intergovernmental Relations. New York: St. Martin’s Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlberding, Julie C. 2002. Does Regionalism Beget Regionalism?, The Relationship between Norms and Regional Partnerships for Economic Development. Public Administration Review 62 ( 4 ): 480 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOstrom, Vincent, Charles Tiebout, and Robert Warren. 1961. The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry. American Political Science Review 55 ( 4 ): 831 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 1997. Treating Networks Seriously: Practical and Research‐Based Agendas in Public Administration. Public Administration Review 57 ( 1 ): 45 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeterson, Paul E. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceProvan, Keith G., and Brinton Milward. 2001. Do Networks Really Work?, A Framework for Evaluating Public‐Sector Organizational Networks. Public Administration Review 64 ( 4 ): 414 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider, Mark., John Scholz, Mark Lubell, Denisa Mindruta, and Matthew Edwardsen. 2003. Building Consensual Institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. American Journal of Political Science 47 ( 1 ): 143 – 58.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchrage, Michael. 1995. No More Teams: Mastering the Dynamics of Creative Collaboration. New York: Currency Doubleday.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShrestha, Manoj, and Richard C. Feiock. 2009. Governing U.S. Metropolitan Areas: Self‐Organizing and Multiplex Service Networks. American Politics Research 37 ( 5 ): 801 – 23.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSimpson, William. 2001. QAP: The Quadratic Assignment Procedure. Working paper. http://fmwww.bc.edu/RePEc/nasug2001/simpson.pdf [accessed November 2, 2011].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, Mike, and Mike Beazley. 2000. Progressive Regimes, Partnerships and the Involvement of Local Communities: A Framework for Evaluation. Public Administration 78 ( 4 ): 855 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteinacker, Annette. 2004. Game‐Theoretic Models of Metropolitan Cooperation. In Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation, edited by Richard C. Feiock, 46 – 66.Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVisser, James A. 2002. Understanding Local Government Cooperation in Urban Regions: Toward a Cultural Model of Interlocal Relations. American Review of Public Administration 32 ( 1 ): 40 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 2003. Collaborative Public Management: New Strategies for Local Governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgresti, Alan. 1996. Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. New York: Wiley.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlter, Catherine, and Jerald Hage. 1993. Organizations Working Together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrew, Simon. 2009. Regional Integration Through Contracting Networks. Urban Affairs Review 44 ( 3 ): 378 – 402.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeman, James S. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. Supplement, American Journal of Sociology 94: 95 – 120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDekker, David, David Krackhardt, and Tom Snijders. 2003. Multicollinearity Robust QAP for Multiple‐Regression. Working paper, Computational Analysis of Social and Organizational Systems. http://www.casos.cs.cmu.edu/publications/papers/dekker_2003_multicollinearity.pdf [accessed November 2, 2011].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, Richard C. 2002. A Quasi‐Market Framework for Local Economic Development Competition. Journal of Urban Affairs 24 ( 2 ): 123 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, Richard C. 2004. Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, Richard C. 2007. Rational Choice and Regionalism. Journal of Urban Affairs 29 ( 1 ): 47 – 63.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, Richard C. 2009. Metropolitan Governance and Institutional Collective Action. Urban Affairs Review 44 ( 3 ): 356 – 77.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, Richard C., In Won Lee, Hyung Jun Park, and Keon Hyung Lee. 2010. Policy Networks among Local Elected Officials: Information, Commitment, and Risk Aversion. Urban Affairs Review 46 ( 2 ): 241 – 62.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, Richard C., and John Scholz. 2010. Self-Organizing Federalism: Collaborative Mechanisms to Mitigate Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas. New York: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeiock, Richard C., Annette Steinacker, and Hyung‐Jun Park. 2009. Institutional Collective Action and Economic Development Joint Ventures. Public Administration Review 69 ( 2 ): 257 – 70.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerguson, Ronald F., and Sara E. Stoutland. 1999. Reconceiving the Community Development Field. In Urban Problems and Community Development, edited by Ronald F. Ferguson and William T. Dickens 33 – 75.Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleischmann, A. 2000. Regionalism and City–County Consolidation in Small Metro Areas. State and Local Government Review 32 ( 3 ): 213 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarcía, María Semitiel. 2006. Social Capital, Networks, and Economic Development: An Analysis of Regional Productive Systems. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoetz, Edward G., and Terrence Kayser. 1993. Competition and Cooperation in Economic Development: A Study of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Economic Development Quarterly 7 (1): 63 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordon, Victoria. 2007. Partners or Competitors?, Perceptions of Regional Economic Development Cooperation in Illinois. Economic Development Quarterly 21 ( 1 ): 60 – 78.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGranovetter, Mark. 1985. Economic Action and Social Structure. Journal of Sociology 91 ( 3 ): 481 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGulati, Ranjay, and Martin Gargiulo. 1999. Where Do Interorganizationl Networks Come From? American Journal of Sociology 104 ( 5 ): 1439 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanneman, Robert A., and Mark Riddle. 2005. Introduction to Social Network Analysis. Riverside: University of California, Riverside. http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/ [accessed November 2, 2011].en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, Martin, and Max Nieman. 2004. Courting Business: Competition for Economic Development among Cities. In Metropolitan Governance: Conflict, Competition, and Cooperation, edited by Richard C. Feiock, 124 – 46. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKettl, Donald F. 1996. Governing at the Millennium. In Handbook of Public Administration, 2nd ed., edited by James L. Perry, 5 – 18.San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1540-6210.2011.02501.x.pdf
Size:
571.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.