View Item 

Show simple item record

Prediction and diagnosis of clinical outcomes affecting restoration margins
dc.contributor.authorDennison, Joseph B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSarrett, D. C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-16T15:55:04Z
dc.date.available2013-06-11T19:15:38Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationDennison, J. B. ; Sarrett, D. C. (2012). "Prediction and diagnosis of clinical outcomes affecting restoration margins." Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 39(4). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90130>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0305-182Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2842en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90130
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherCaries Adjacent to Restorations and Sealantsen_US
dc.subject.otherMargin Discolorationen_US
dc.subject.otherMicroleakageen_US
dc.subject.otherClinical Testingen_US
dc.subject.otherMargin Gapen_US
dc.subject.otherSecondary Cariesen_US
dc.titlePrediction and diagnosis of clinical outcomes affecting restoration marginsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistryen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Cariology, Restorative Sciences and Endodontics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherVirginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, Richmond, VA, USAen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22066463en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90130/1/j.1365-2842.2011.02267.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02267.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Oral Rehabilitationen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElderton RJ. Clinical studies concerning re‐restoration of teeth. Adv Dent Res. 1990; 4: 4 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKidd EA, Beighton D. Prediction of secondary caries around tooth‐colored restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res. 1996; 75: 1942 – 1946.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKidd EA, Joyston‐Bechal S, Beighton D. Marginal ditching and staining as a predictor of secondary caries around amalgam restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res. 1995; 74: 1206 – 1211.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBogacki RE, Hunt RJ, del Aguila M, Smith WR. Survival analysis of posterior restorations using an insurance claims database. Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 488 – 492.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKidd EA. Secondary caries. Dent Update. 1981; 8: 253 – 260.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKidd EA. Caries diagnosis within restored teeth. Adv Dent Res. 1990; 4: 10 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKidd EA, Joyston‐Bechal S, Beighton D. Microbiological validation of assessments of caries activity during cavity preparation. Caries Res. 1993; 27: 402 – 408.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyd MA, Richardson AS. Frequency of amalgam replacement in general dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 1985; 51: 763 – 766.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamilton JC, Moffa JP, Ellison JA, Jenkins WA. Marginal fracture not a predictor of longevity for two dental amalgam alloys: a ten‐year study. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50: 200 – 202.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKidd EA, Joyston‐Bechal S, Beighton D. Diagnosis of secondary caries: a laboratory study. Br Dent J. 1994; 176: 135 – 138, 139.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKidd EA, O’Hara JW. The caries status of occlusal amalgam restorations with marginal defects. J Dent Res. 1990; 69: 1275 – 1277.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKidd EA, Toffenetti F, Mjor IA. Secondary caries. Int Dent J. 1992; 42: 127 – 138.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKidd EM. Caries diagnosis within restored teeth. Oper Dent. 1989; 14: 149 – 158.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSarrett DC. Prediction of clinical outcomes of a restoration based on in vivo marginal quality evaluation. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9 ( Suppl 1 ): 117 – 120.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOzer L. The relationship between gap size, microbial accumulation and the structurual features of natural caries in extracted teeth with class II amalgam restorations. Thesis, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 1997.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordan VV, Riley JL 3rd, Blaser PK, Mjor IA. 2‐year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations. Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 418 – 425.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGordan VV, Shen C, Riley J 3rd, Mjor IA. Two‐year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006; 18: 144 – 153; discussion 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoncada G, Fernandez E, Martin J, Arancibia C, Mjor IA, Gordan VV. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two‐year clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2008; 33: 258 – 264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoncada GC, Martin J, Fernandez E, Vildosola PG, Caamano C, Caro MJ et al. Alternative treatments for resin‐based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12‐month clinical trial. Gen Dent. 2006; 54: 314 – 318.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMjor IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Oper Dent. 2002; 27: 528 – 534.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceICDAS. Rationale and evidence for the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS II). Available at: http://www.icdas.org 2005, accessed 4 October, 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSarrett DC. Clinical challenges and the relevance of materials testing for posterior composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2005; 21: 9 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig. 2005; 9: 215 – 232.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCvar J, Ryge G. Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. San Francisco (CA): U.S. Government Printing Office; 1971: USPHS publ. no. 790‐240.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSturdevant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR (eds). The art and science of operative dentistry, 33rd edn. St. Louis (MO): Mosby Elsevier; 1995: 571 – 572.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSummitt JB, Robbins JN, Schwartz RS (eds). Fundamentals of operative dentistry, 2nd edn. Carol Stream (IL): Quintessence Pub.; 2001: 179 – 183.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDennison JB, Craig RG. Characterization of enamel surfaces prepared with commercial and experimental etchants. J Am Dent Assoc. 1978; 97: 799 – 805.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePowers JM, Sakaguchi RL (eds). Craig’s restorative dental materials, 12th edn. St. Louis (MO): Mosby Elsevier; 2006: 98 – 99.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakamura M. Identification of a resin‐dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: durable bonding to vital dentin. Quintessence Int. 1992; 23L: 135 – 141.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P et al. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 215 – 235.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelsen RJ, Wolcott RO, Paffenberfer GC. Fluid exchange at the margins of dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1952; 44: 288 – 295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLida H, Kumar JV. The association between enamel fluorosis and dental caries in U.S. schoolchildren. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140: 855 – 862.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCox CF. Microleakage related to restorative procedures. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1992; 88 ( Suppl 1 ): 83 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJorgensen KD, Wakumoto S. Occlusal amalgam fillings: marginal defects and secondary caries. Odontol Tidskr. 1968; 76: 43 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quintessence Int. 1986; 17: 103 – 111.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH. Physical properties and gap formation of light‐cured composites with and without ‘softstart‐polymerization’. J Dent. 1997; 25: 321 – 330.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeves GW, Fitchie JG, Hembree JH Jr, Puckett AD. Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth. Oper Dent. 1995; 20: 230 – 235.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlmeida KG, Scheibe KG, Oliveira AE, Alves CM, Costa JF. Influence of human and bovine substrate on the microleakage of two adhesive systems. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17: 92 – 96.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLopes MB, Consani S, Gonini‐Junior A, Moura SK, McCabe JF. Comparison of microleakage in human and bovine substrates using confocal microscopy. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 2009; 50: 111 – 116.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhosravi K, Ataei E, Mousavi M, Khodaeian N. Effect of phosphoric acid etching of enamel margins on the microleakage of a simplified all‐in‐one and a self‐etch adhesive system. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 531 – 536.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBagis YH, Baitacioglu IH, Kahyaogullari S. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane‐based resin composite in wide Class II MOD cavities. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 578 – 585.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider H, Busch I, Busch M, Jentsch H, Hafer M. Effect of operator‐specific handling on tooth‐composite interface and microleakage formation. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 200 – 210.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSadeghi M, Lynch CD. The effect of flowable materials on the microleakage of Class II composite restorations that extend apical to the cemento‐enamel junction. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 306 – 311.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBesnault C, Attal JP. Influence of a simulated oral environment on microleakage of two adhesive systems in Class II composite restorations. J Dent. 2002; 30: 1 – 6.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCehreli ZC, Gungor HC. Quantitative microleakage evaluation of fissure sealants applied with or without a bonding agent: results after four‐year water storage in vitro. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10: 379 – 384.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCalabrez‐Filho S, Calabrez VC, Reston EG, de Andrade MF, Borges LH. Influence of the internal conditioning of indirect restorations of resin composite in relation to microleakage using LEDs and QTH units. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 293 – 298.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoyuturk AE, Kusgoz A, Ulker M, Yesilyurt C. Effects of mechanical and thermal aging on microleakage of different fissure sealants. Dent Mater. 2008; 27: 795 – 801.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArisu HD, Uctasli MB, Eliguzeloglu E, Ozcan S, Omuriu H. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations. Oper Dent. 2008; 33: 135 – 141.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorges AB, Torres CR, Cassiano KV, Toyama RV, Pucci CR. Influence of matrix and insertion technique on the microleakage and microhardness of posterior composite restorations. Gen Dent. 2009; 57: 163 – 170.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtlas AM, Raman P, Dworak M, Mante F, Blatz MB. Effect of delayed light polymerization of a dual cured composite base on microleakage of Class 2 posterior composite open‐sandwich restorations. Quintessence Int. 2009; 40: 471 – 477.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEbert J, Loffler C, Roggendorf MJ, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Clinical adhesive sealing of the pulp chamber following endodontic treatment: influence of thermomechanical loading on microleakage. J Adhes Dent. 2009; 11: 311 – 317.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeintze S, Forjanic M, Cavalleri A. Microleakage of Class II restorations with different tracers‐comparison with SEM quantitative analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10: 259 – 267.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Almeida JB, Platt JA, Oshida Y, Moore BK, Cochran MA, Eckert GJ. Three different methods to evaluate microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations. Oper Dent. 2003; 28: 453 – 460.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran MA, Gonzales MA, Platt JA, Moore BK. In vitro microleakage of four tracers with multiple applications to the same tooth. Oper Dent. 2004; 29: 443 – 447.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaskin A, Tassery H, D’Hoore W, Gonthier S, Vreven J, Degrange M et al. Influence of the number of sections on reliability of in vitro microleakage evaluations. Am J Dent. 2003; 16: 207 – 210.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoldes VL, Capp CI, Navarro RS, Matos AB, Youssef MN, Cassoni A. In vitro microleakage of composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG/Er,Cr: YSGG lasers and conventional drills associated with two adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2009; 11: 221 – 229.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuarte S Jr, deFreitas CR, Saad JR, Sadan A. The effect of immediate dentin sealing on the marginal adaptation and bond strengths of total‐etch and self‐etch adhesives. J Prosthet Dent. 2009; 102: 1 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroes‐Salgado NR, Pfeifer CS, Francci CE, Kawano Y. Influence of photoactivation protocol and light guide distance on conversion and microleakage of composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 408 – 414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKhoroushi M, Fardashtaki SR. Effect of light‐activated bleaching on the microleakage of Class V tooth‐colored restorations. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 565 – 570.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSiso HS, Kustarci A, Goktolga EG. Microleakage in resin composite restorations after antimicrobial pre‐treatments: effect of KTP laser chlorhexidine gluconate and Clearfil Protect Bond. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 321 – 327.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOzel E, Soyman M. Effect of fiber nets, application techniques and flowable composites on microleakage and the effect of fiber nets on polymerization shrinkage in class II MOD cavities. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 174 – 180.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOnay EO, Ungor M, Unver S, Ari H, Belli S. An in vitro evaluation of the apical sealing ability of new polymeric endodontic filling systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108: 49 – 54.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFanian F, Hadavi F, Asgar K. Marginal leakage of dental amalgam. Oper Dent. 1983; 8: 11 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDennison JB, Meyer JM, Birnholtz SB, Craig RG. Initial leakage under pit and fissure sealants assessed by neutron activation. J Dent Res. 1974; 53: 1439 – 1444.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrobler SR, Rossouw RJ, Oberholzer TG. Microleakage and confocal laser studies of 2 single‐step self‐etching bonding agents/systems. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38: 334 – 341.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLima FG, Romano AR, Correa MB, Demarco FF. Influence of microleakage, surface roughness and biofilm control on secondary caries formation around composite resin restorations: an in situ evaluation. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009; 17: 61 – 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobson SM, von Fraunhofer JA. The investigation of microleakage in root canal therapy. An electrochemical technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976; 42: 817 – 823.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoosavi H, Moghaddas MJ, Ghoddusi J. Effects of two antioxidants on the microleakage of resin‐based composite restorations after nonvital bleaching. J Contemp Dent Pract. [Internet]. 2010; 11: 33 – 40.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSun J, Eidelman N, Lin‐Gibson S. 3D mapping of polymerization shrinkage using x‐ray micro‐computed tomographhy to predict microleakage. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 314 – 320.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFleming GJ, Hall DP, Shortall AC, Burke FJ. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with posterior filling materials of varying reported volumetric shrinkage values. J Dent. 2005; 33: 139 – 146.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmaral CM, Peris AR, Ambrosano GM, Pimenta LA. Microleakage and gap formation of resin composite restorations polymerized with different techniques. Am J Dent. 2004; 17: 156 – 160.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFakhri M, Seraj B, Shahrabi M, Motahhary P, Hooshmand T. Effect of salivary contamination on microleakage of resin composites placed with a self‐etch adhesive in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Pediatr Dent. 2009; 31: 334 – 339.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBulucu B, Avsar A, Demiryurek EO, Yesilyurt C. Effect of radiotherapy on the microleakage of adhesive systems. J Adhes Dent. 2009; 11: 305 – 309.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaskin A, D’Hoore W, Gonthier S, Degrange M, Dejou J. Reliability of in vitro microleakage tests: a literature review. J Adhes Dent. 2001; 3: 295 – 308.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRyge G, Snyder MA. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973; 87: 369 – 377.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDennsion JB, Yaman P, Fasbinder DJ. Repair of resin margin defects: clinical trial after five years. J Dent Res. 2006; 85 ( Spec Iss B ):0542; Available at: http://www.dentalresearch.org, accessed 4 October, 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalaniappan S, Bharadwaj D, Mattar DL, Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P. Three‐year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 1302 – 1314.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwift EJ Jr, Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Sturdevant JR, Wilder AD Jr. 36‐month clinical evaluation of two adhesives and microhybrid resin composites in Class I restorations. Am J Dent. 2008; 21: 148 – 152.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoon EC, Smales RJ, Yip KH. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin‐based composites: results at 3.5 years. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136: 1533 – 1540.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl LA. A three‐year clinical evaluation of two‐bottle versus one‐bottle dentin adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136: 311 – 322.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFranco EB, Benetti AR, Ishikiriama SK, Santiago SL, Lauris JR, Jorge MF et al. 5‐year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non‐carious cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2006; 31: 403 – 408.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFagundes TC, Barata TJ, Carvalho CA, Franco EB, van Dijken JW, Navarro MF. Clinical evaluation of two packable posterior composites: a five‐year follow‐up. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140: 447 – 454.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeumans M, De Munck J, Van Lauduyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Five‐year clinical effectiveness of a two‐step self‐etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 7 – 10.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKiremitci A, Alpasian T, Gurgan S. Six‐year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2009; 34: 11 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilder AD Jr, Swift EJ, Heymann HO, Ritter AV, Sturdevant JR, Bayne SC. A 12‐year clinical evaluation of a three‐step dentin adhesive in noncarious cervical lesions. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009; 140: 526 – 553.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilder AD Jr, May KN Jr, Bayne SC, Taylor DF, Leingelder KF. Seventeen‐year clinical study of ultraviolet‐cured posterior composite Class I and II restorations. J Esthet Dent. 1999; 11: 135 – 142.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceda Rosa PA, Cenci MS, Donassollo TA, Loguercio AD, Demarco FF. A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17‐year findings. J Dent. 2006; 34: 427 – 435.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeintze SD. Systematic reviews. I. The correlation between laboratory tests on margin quality and bond strength. II. The correlation between marginal quality and clinical outcome. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 77 – 106.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrankenberger R, Kramer N, Lohbauer U, Nikolaenko SA, Reich SM. Marginal integrity: is the clinical performance of bonded restorations predictable in vitro? J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9: 107 – 116.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeintze SD, Blunck U, Gohring TN, Rousson V. Marginal adaptation in vitro and clinical outcome of Class V restorations. Dent Mater. 2009; 25: 605 – 620.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMjor IA. Clinical diagnosis of recurrent caries. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136: 1426 – 1433.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMjor IA, Toffenetti F. Secondary caries: a literature review with case reports. Quintessence Int. 2000; 31: 165 – 179.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2007; 11: 5 – 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSöderholm KJ, Antonson DE, Fischischweiger W. Correlation between marginal discrepancies at the amalgam/tooth interface and recurrent caries. In: Anusavice KJ ed. Quality evaluation of dental restorations: criteria for placement and replacement. Chicago (IL): Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc. 1989: 95 – 108.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1365-2842.2011.02267.x.pdf
Size:
249.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.