Show simple item record

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate and prognostic in head and neck melanoma

dc.contributor.authorErman, Audrey B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCollar, Ryan M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGriffith, Kent A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLowe, Lorien_US
dc.contributor.authorSabel, Michael S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBichakjian, Christopher K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWong, Sandra L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMcLean, Scott A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRees, Riley S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Timothy M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBradford, Carol R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-16T15:55:14Z
dc.date.available2013-04-01T14:17:25Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-02-15en_US
dc.identifier.citationErman, Audrey B.; Collar, Ryan M.; Griffith, Kent A.; Lowe, Lori; Sabel, Michael S.; Bichakjian, Christopher K.; Wong, Sandra L.; McLean, Scott A.; Rees, Riley S.; Johnson, Timothy M.; Bradford, Carol R. (2012). "Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate and prognostic in head and neck melanoma ." Cancer 118(4): 1040-1047. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90137>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0008-543Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1097-0142en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90137
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as a widely used staging procedure for cutaneous melanoma. However, debate remains around the accuracy and prognostic implications of SLNB for cutaneous melanoma arising in the head and neck, as previous reports have demonstrated inferior results to those in nonhead and neck regions. Through the largest single‐institution series of head and neck melanoma patients, the authors set out to demonstrate that SLNB accuracy and prognostic value in the head and neck region are comparable to other sites. METHODS: A prospectively collected database was queried for cutaneous head and neck melanoma patients who underwent SLNB at the University of Michigan between 1997 and 2007. Primary endpoints included SLNB result, time to recurrence, site of recurrence, and date and cause of death. Multivariate models were constructed for analyses. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty‐three patients were identified. A sentinel lymph node was identified in 352 of 353 patients (99.7%). Sixty‐nine of the 353 (19.6%) patients had a positive SLNB. Seventeen of 68 patients (25%) undergoing completion lymphadenectomy after a positive SLNB result had at least 1 additional positive nonsentinel lymph node. Patients with local control and a negative SLNB failed regionally in 4.2% of cases. Multivariate analysis revealed positive SLNB status to be the most prognostic clinicopathologic predictor of poor outcome; hazard ratio was 4.23 for SLNB status and recurrence‐free survival ( P < .0001) and 3.33 for overall survival ( P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: SLNB is accurate and its results are of prognostic importance for head and neck melanoma patients. Cancer 2012;. © 2011 American Cancer Society. This is the largest single‐institution series of patients with head and neck melanoma (n = 353) to date. The authors demonstrate sentinel lymph node biopsy to be reliable (99.7% identification rate), accurate (19.7% positive sentinel lymph node biopsy rate and 4.2% false‐omission rate), and strongly prognostic of survival on multivariate analysis.en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherCutaneousen_US
dc.subject.otherMelanomaen_US
dc.subject.otherHead and Necken_US
dc.subject.otherSentinel Lymph Node Biopsyen_US
dc.subject.otherAccuracyen_US
dc.subject.otherPrognosisen_US
dc.titleSentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate and prognostic in head and neck melanomaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Healthen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Dermatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Pathology, Division of Dermatopathology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiostatistics Unit, University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Health System, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109‐5312en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.identifier.pmid21773971en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90137/1/26288_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/cncr.26288en_US
dc.identifier.sourceCanceren_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatel SG, Coit DG, Shaha AR, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous head and neck melanomas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 128: 285 ‐ 291.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChao C, Wong SL, Edwards MJ, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck melanomas. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003; 10: 21 ‐ 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson GW, Page AJ, Cohen C, et al. Regional recurrence after negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma. Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 378 ‐ 386.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaltman BE, Ganly I, Patel SG, Coit DG, Brady MS, Wong RJ. Prognostic implication of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma. Head Neck. 2010; 32: 1686 ‐ 1692.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeong SP, Accortt NA, Essner R, et al. Impact of sentinel node status and other risk factors on the clinical outcome of head and neck melanoma patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 132: 370 ‐ 373.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGomez‐Rivera F, Santillan A, McMurphey AB, et al. Sentinel node biopsy in patients with cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck: recurrence and survival study. Head Neck. 2008; 30: 1284 ‐ 1294.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaek SC, Griffith KA, Johnson TM, et al. The impact of factors beyond Breslow depth on predicting sentinel lymph node positivity in melanoma. Cancer. 2007; 109: 100 ‐ 108.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUren RF, Howman‐Giles RB, Shaw HM, Thompson JF, McCarthy WH. Lymphoscintigraphy in high‐risk melanoma of the trunk: predicting draining node groups, defining lymphatic channels and locating the sentinel node. J Nucl Med. 1993; 34: 1435 ‐ 1440.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmalbach CE, Nussenbaum B, Rees RS, Schartz J, Johnson TM, Bradford CR. Reliability of sentinel lymph node mapping with biopsy for head and neck cutaneous melanoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 129: 61 ‐ 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Comprehensive Cancer Network. Cancer references and guidelines. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp Accessed January 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarimpour DJ, Lowe L, Su L, et al. Standard immunostains for melanoma in sentinel lymph node specimens: which ones are most useful? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004; 50: 759 ‐ 764.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcMasters KM, Reitgen DS, Ross MI, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: how many radioactive nodes should be removed? Ann Surg Oncol. 2001; 8: 192 ‐ 197.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceva der Ploeg AP, van Akkooi AC, Schmitz PI, Koljenovic S, Verhoef C, Eggermont AM. EORTC Melanoma Group sentinel node protocol identifies high rate of submicrometastases according to Rotterdam Criteria. Eur J Cancer. 2010; 46: 2414 ‐ 2421.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, et al. Sentinel‐node biopsy or nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1307 ‐ 1317.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNowecki ZI, Rutkowski P,Nasierowska‐Guttmejer Ruka W. Analysis and clinicopathologic factors associated with false negative sentinel lymph node biopsy findings in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006; 13: 1655 ‐ 1663.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson GW, Murray DR, Lyles RH, Hestlet A, Cohen C. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in the management of cutaneous head and neck melanoma. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005; 115: 721 ‐ 728.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTelztrow T, Osinga J, Schwipper V. Reliability of sentinel‐node extirpation as a diagnostic method for malignant melanoma of the head and neck region. Int J Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 35: 481 ‐ 487.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeWilt JH, Thompson JF, Uren RF, et al. Correlation between preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and metastatic nodal disease sites in 362 patients with cutaneous melanomas of the head and neck. Ann Surg. 2004; 239: 544 ‐ 552.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoting EH, de Vries M, Plukker JT, et al. Does sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous head and neck melanoma alter disease outcome? J Surg Oncol. 2006; 93: 564 ‐ 570.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelly J, Fogarty K, Redmond HP. A definitive role for sentinel lymph node mapping with biopsy for cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck. Surgeon. 2009; 6: 336 ‐ 339.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShiptzer T, Segal K, Schachter J, et al. Sentinel node guided surgery for melanoma in the head and neck region. Melanoma Res. 2004; 14: 283 ‐ 287.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorton DL, Thompson JF, Essner R, et al. Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for early‐stage melanoma: a multicenter trial. Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial Group. Ann Surg. 1999; 230: 453 ‐ 463.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2001; 19: 3622 ‐ 3634.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePicon AI, Colt AR, Brady MS, et al. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous head and neck melanoma: mapping the parotid gland. Ann Surg Oncol. [published online May 23, 2006.]en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoree TR, Tomljanovich PI, Cheney RT, Hicks WL, Rigual NR. Intraparotid sentinel lymph node biopsy for head and neck melanoma. Laryngoscope. 2006; 116: 1461 ‐ 1464.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOllila DW, Foshag LJ, Essner R, Stern SL, Morton DL. Parotid region lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for cutaneous melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999; 6: 150 ‐ 154.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBostick P, Essner S, Kelley M. Intraoperative mapping for early‐stage melanoma of the head and neck. Am J Surg. 1997; 174: 536 ‐ 539.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWells KE, Rapaport DP, Cruse CW. Sentinel lymph node biopsy in melanoma of the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 591 ‐ 594.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlson GW, Murray DR, Greenlee R. Management of malignant melanoma of the head and neck using dynamic lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe–guided sentinel lymph node biopsy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 126: 433 ‐ 437.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJansen L, Koops HS, Nieweg OE. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma in the head and neck region. Head Neck. 2000; 22: 27 ‐ 33.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWagner JD, Park HM, Coleman JJ III, Love C, Hayes JT. Cervical lymph node biopsy for melanomas of the head and neck and upper thorax. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 126: 313 ‐ 321.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMedina‐Franco H, Beenken SW, Heslin MJ, Urist MM. Sentinel node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma in the head and neck. Ann Surg Oncol. 2001; 8: 716 ‐ 719.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmalbach CE, Nussenbaum B, Rees RS, Schwartz J, Johnson TM, Bradford CR. Reliability of sentinel lymph node mapping with biopsy for head and neck cutaneous melanoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 129: 61 ‐ 65.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMacNeill KN, Ghazarian D, McCready D, Rotstein L. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma of the head and neck. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005; 12: 726 ‐ 732.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin D, Franc BL, Kashani‐Sabert M, Singer MI. Lymphatic drainage patterns of head and neck cutaneous melanoma observed on lymphoscintigraphy and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Head Neck. 2006; 28: 249 ‐ 255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKilpatrick LA, Shen P, Stewart JH, Levine EA. Use of sentinel node biopsy for melanoma of the head and neck. Ann Surg. 2007; 73: 754 ‐ 758.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgnese DM, Maupin R, Tillman B, Pozderac RD, Margo C, Walker MJ. Head and neck melanoma in the sentinel lymph node era. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007; 133: 1121 ‐ 1124.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoskivuo IO, Kinnunen IA, Suominen EA, Vihinen PP, Grenman RA. Head and neck cutaneous melanoma: a retrospective observational study on 146 pateints. Acta Oncol. 2009; 48: 460 ‐ 467.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg. 1992; 127: 392 ‐ 399.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27: 6199 ‐ 6206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Brien CJ, Uren RF, Thompson JF, et al. Prediction of potential metastatic sites in cutaneous head and neck melanoma using lymphoscintigraphy. Am J Surg. 1995; 170: 461 ‐ 466.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWillis AI, Ridge JA. Discordant lymphatic drainage patterns revealed by serial lymphoscintigraphy in cutaneous head and neck malignancies. Head Neck. 2007; 29: 979 ‐ 985.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorton DL, Cochran AJ, Thompson JF, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for early‐stage melanoma: accuracy and morbidity in MSLT‐I, an international multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 302 ‐ 311.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.