Show simple item record

Large‐scale science education intervention research we can use

dc.contributor.authorPenuel, William R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorFishman, Barry J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-16T15:57:22Z
dc.date.available2013-05-01T17:24:43Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationPenuel, William R.; Fishman, Barry J. (2012). "Large‐scale science education intervention research we can use." Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49(3): 281-304. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90232>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4308en_US
dc.identifier.issn1098-2736en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90232
dc.description.abstractThis article develops an argument that the type of intervention research most useful for improving science teaching and learning and leading to scalable interventions includes both research to develop and gather evidence of the efficacy of innovations and a different kind of research, design‐based implementation research (DBIR). DBIR in education focuses on what is required to bring interventions and knowledge about learning to all students, wherever they might engage in science learning. This research focuses on implementation, both in the development and initial testing of interventions and in the scaling up process. In contrast to traditional intervention research that focuses principally on one level of educational systems, DBIR designs and tests interventions that cross levels and settings of learning, with the aim of investigating and improving the effective implementation of interventions. The article concludes by outlining four areas of DBIR that may improve the likelihood that new standards for science education will achieve their intended purpose of establishing an effective, equitable, and coherent system of opportunities for science learning in the United States. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 49: 281–304, 2012en_US
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Companyen_US
dc.subject.otherScience Educationen_US
dc.subject.otherStandardsen_US
dc.subject.otherImplementationen_US
dc.subject.otherPolicyen_US
dc.subject.otherEvaluation and Theoryen_US
dc.titleLarge‐scale science education intervention research we can useen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducationen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelScience (General)en_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelWomen's and Gender Studiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHumanitiesen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusinessen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado.en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of Colorado, Boulder, Coloradoen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90232/1/21001_ftp.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/tea.21001en_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Research in Science Teachingen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoth, K. J., Garnier, H. E., Chen, C., Lemmens, M., Schwille, K., & Wickler, N. I. Z. ( 2011 ). Videobased lesson analysis: Effective PD for teacher and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 ( 2 ), 117 – 148.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScafidi, B., Sjoquist, D. L., & Stinebrickner, T. R. ( 2007 ). Race, poverty, and teacher mobility. Economics of Education Review, 26 ( 2 ), 145 – 159.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. ( 2002 ). Supporting science teacher learning: The role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13 ( 3 ), 221 – 245.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. ( 2002 ). Experimental and quasi‐experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton‐Mifflin.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShear, L., & Penuel, W. R. ( 2010 ). Rock‐solid support: Florida district weighs effectiveness of science professional learning. Journal of Staff Development, 31 ( 5 ), 48 – 51.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSloane, F.C. ( 2008 ). Through the looking glass: Experiments, quasi‐experiments, and the medical model. Educational Researcher, 37 ( 1 ), 41 – 46.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith, T. M., Desimone, L. M., Zeidner, T. L., Dunn, A. C., Bhatt, M., & Rumyantseva, N. L. ( 2007 ). Inquiry‐oriented instruction in science: Who teaches that way? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29 ( 3 ), 169 – 199.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSonger, N. B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A. W. ( 2009 ). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 ( 6 ), 610 – 631.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSonger, N. B., Lee, H.‐S., & Kam, R. ( 2002 ). Technology‐rich inquiry science in urban classrooms: What are the barriers to inquiry pedagogy? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 ( 2 ), 128 – 150.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpillane, J. P., & Callahan, K. E. ( 2002 ). Implementing state standards for science education: What district policy makers make of the hoopla. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 ( 5 ), 201 – 225.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Walker, L. J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. ( 2001 ). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 ( 8 ), 918 – 940.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStern, L., & Ahlgren, A. ( 2002 ). Analysis of students' assessments in middle school curriculum materials: Aiming precisely at benchmarks and standards. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 ( 9 ), 889 – 910.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevens, R., O'Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. M. ( 2008 ). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 97 ( 3 ), 355 – 368.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSung, N. S., Crowley, W. F., Jr., Genel, M., Salber, P., Sandy, L., Sherwood, L. M., … Rimoin, D. ( 2003 ). Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise. Journal of the American Medical Association, 289 ( 10 ), 1278 – 1287.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSupovitz, J. A. ( 2008 ). Implementation as iterative refraction. In J. A. Supovitz & E. H. Weinbaum (Eds.), The implementation gap: Understanding reform in high schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSupovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. ( 2000 ). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 ( 2 ), 963 – 980.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSupovitz, J. A., & Zief, S. G. ( 2000 ). Why they stay away: Survey reveals invisible barriers to teacher participation. Journal of Staff Development, 21 ( 4 ), 24 – 28.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTabak, I. ( 2006 ). Prospects for change at the nexus of policy and design. Educational Resercher, 35 ( 2 ), 24 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. ( 2006 ). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143 – 1144.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTai, R. H., & Maltese, A. V. ( 2010 ). Eyeballs in the fridge: Sources of early interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32 ( 5 ), 669 – 685.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson, J., Windschitl, M., Braaten, M. ( 2010 ). Developing a theory of teacher practice. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Conference, Philadelphia, PA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTzou, C. T., Bricker, L. A., & Bell, P. ( 2007 ). Micros & Me: A fifth‐grade science exploration into personally and culturally consequential microbiology. Seattle, WA: Everyday Science and Technology Group, University of Washington.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVanosdall, R., Klentschy, M. P., Hedges, L. V., Weisbaum, K. S. ( 2007 ). A randomized study of the effects of scaffolded guided‐inquiry instruction on student achievement in science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWarren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, S., & Hudicourt‐Barnes, J. ( 2001 ). Rethinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday sense‐making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 ( 5 ), 529 – 552.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatson, M. C., Bond, C. M., Grimshaw, J. M., Mollison, J., Ludbrook, A., & Walker, A. E. ( 2002 ). Educational strategies to promote evidence‐based community pharmacy practice: A cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). Family Practice, 19 ( 5 ), 529 – 536.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeinbaum, E. H., & Supovitz, J. A. ( 2010 ). Planning ahead: Make program implementation more predictable. Phi Delta Kappan, 91 ( 7 ), 68 – 71.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiggins, G., & McTighe, J. ( 1998 ). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWillinsky, J. ( 2001 ). The strategic education research program and the public value of research. Educational Researcher, 30 ( 1 ), 5 – 14.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWindschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. ( 2008 ). How novice science teachers appropriate epistemic discourses around model‐based inquiry for use in classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 26 ( 3 ), 310 – 378.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoolf, S. H. ( 2008 ). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 299 ( 2 ), 211 – 213.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAguiar, O. G., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. ( 2010 ). Learning from and responding to students' questions: The authoritative and dialogic tension. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 ( 2 ), 174 – 193.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Association for the Advancement of Science.( 1993 ). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAres, N. ( 2010 ). Political and cultural dimensions of organizing learning around funds of knowledge. In W. R. Penuel & K. O'Connor (Eds). Learning research as a human science. National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, 109 ( 1 ), 192 – 206.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBallenger, C. ( 2009 ). Puzzling moments, teachable moments: Practicing teacher research in urban classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBang, M., & Medin, D. ( 2010 ). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94 ( 6 ), 1008 – 1026.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBang, M., Medin, D., & Atran, S. ( 2007 ). Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104 ( 35 ), 13868 – 13874.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarton, A. C., & Tan, E. ( 2009 ). Funds of knowledge, discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46 ( 1 ), 50 – 73.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBessell, A. G., Burke, M. C., Plaza, M. P., Lee, O., & Schumm, J. S. ( 2010 ). The educational reform rating rubric: Example of a new tool for evaluating complex school reform initiatives. Field Methods, 20 ( 3 ), 283 – 295.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeyer, H., & Holtzblatt, K. ( 1997 ). Contextual design: A customer‐centered approach to systems designs. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. ( 2000 ). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology‐embedded project‐based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35 ( 3 ), 149 – 164.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBorman, G. D., Gamoran, A., & Bowdon, J. ( 2008 ). A randomized trial of teacher development in elementary science: First‐year achievement effects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1 ( 3 ), 237 – 264.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBryk, A.S. ( 2009 ). Support a science of performance improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 90 ( 8 ), 597 – 600.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBryk, A. S., & Gomez, L. M. ( 2008 ). Reinventing a research and development capacity. In F. M. Hess (Ed.), The future of educational entrepreneurship: Possibilities for school reform (pp. 181 – 187 ). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuckley, B. C., Gobert, J. D., Kindfield, A. C. H., Horwitz, P., Tinker, R. F., Gerlitz, B., & Willett, J. ( 2004 ). Model‐based teaching and learning with BioLogicaTM: What do they learn? How do they learn? How do we know? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13 ( 1 ), 23 – 41.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlone, H. B. ( 2004 ). The cultural production of science in reform‐based physics: Girls' access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 ( 4 ), 392 – 414.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlone, H. B., Haun‐Frank, J., & Webb, A. ( 2011 ). Assessing equity beyond knowledge‐ and skills‐based outcomes: A comparative ethnography of two fourth‐grade reform‐based science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48 ( 5 ), 459 – 485.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChin, C., & Osborne, J. ( 2010 ). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 ( 7 ), 883 – 908.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCobb, P. A., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. ( 2003 ). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32 ( 1 ), 9 – 13.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochrane Collaboration.( 2005 ). Continuing education meetings and workshops: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane review). Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 21 ( 3 ), 187 – 188.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. ( 2001 ). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConfrey, J., Castro‐Filho, J., & Wilhelm, J. ( 2000 ). Implementation research as a means to link systemic reform and applied psychology in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 35 ( 3 ), 179 – 191.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCooper, C. R., Denner, J., & Lopez, E. M. ( 1999 ). Cultural brokers: Helping Latino children on pathways toward success. The Future of Children, 9, 51 – 57.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. ( 2009 ). Learning progressions in science: An evidence‐based approach to reform. CPRE Research Report # RR‐63. New York, NY: Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement, Teachers College, Columbia University.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCordray, D. S., & Pion, G. M. ( 2006 ). Treatment strength and integrity: Models and methods. In R. R. Bootzin & P. E. McKnight (Eds.), Strengthening research methodology: Psychological measurement and evaluation (pp. 103 – 124 ). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDesimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. F. ( 2002 ). Effects of professional development on teachers' instruction: Results from a three‐year longitudinal study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24 ( 2 ), 81 – 112.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonovan, S., Wigdor, A. K., & Snow, C. E. ( 2003 ). Strategic education research partnership. Washington, DC: National Research Council.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDrake, C., & Sherin, M. G. ( 2006 ). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36 ( 2 ), 153 – 187.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDynarski, M. ( 2008 ). Bringing answers to educators: Guiding principles for research syntheses. Educational Researcher, 37 ( 1 ), 27 – 29.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFishman, B. J., & Krajcik, J. ( 2003 ). What does it mean to create sustainable science curriculum innovations? A commentary. Science Education, 87 ( 4 ), 564 – 573.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., & Tal, R. ( 2003 ). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19 ( 6 ), 643 – 658.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., & Ji, P. ( 2005 ). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness, and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6 ( 3 ), 151 – 175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGallas, K. ( 1995 ). Talking their way into science: Hearing children's questions and theories, responding with curricula. New York: Teachers College Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaret, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L. M., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. ( 2001 ). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38 ( 4 ), 915 – 945.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGee, J. P. ( 2004 ). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school‐based literacy. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 10 – 32 ). Newark, DE: International Reading Association, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGee, J. P., & Clinton, K. ( 2000 ). An African American child's 'science talk': Co‐construction of meaning from the perspective of multiple Discourses. In M. Gallego & S. Hollingsworth (Eds.), What counts as literacy: Challenging the school standard (pp. 118 – 135 ). New York: Teachers College Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeier, R., Blumenfeld, P., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B. J., & Soloway, E. ( 2008 ). Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry‐based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 ( 8 ), 922 – 939.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerard, L., Bowyer, J., & Marx, R. ( 2008 ). A community of principals: Building school leadership for scaling technology‐science curriculum reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGorden, V. S., & Bieman, J. M. ( 1995 ). Rapid prototyping: Lessons learned. IEEE Software, 12 ( 1 ), 85 – 95.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGutiérrez, K. D., Baquedano‐Lopez, P., & Tejada, C. ( 2000 ). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 6 ( 4 ), 286 – 303.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGutiérrez, K. D., & Orellana, M. ( 2006 ). The problem of English learners: Constructing genres of difference. Research in the Teaching of English, 40 ( 4 ), 502 – 507.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. ( 2003 ). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32 ( 5 ), 19 – 25.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGutiérrez, K. D., & Vossoughi, S. ( 2010 ). Lifting off the ground to return anew: Mediated praxis, transformative learning, and social design experiments. Journal of Teacher Education, 61 ( 1–2 ), 100 – 117.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. ( 1993 ). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalverson, R., Feinstein, N., & Meshoulam, D. ( 2011 ). School leadership for science education. In G. E. DeBoer (Ed.), The role of public policy in K‐12 science education (pp. 397 – 430 ). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M.‐C. ( 2010 ). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 ( 8 ), 978 – 1003.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerrenkohl, L. R., & Mertl, V. ( 2010 ). How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHonig, M. I., & Hatch, T. C. ( 2004 ). Crafting coherence: How schools strategically manage multiple, external demands. Educational Researcher, 33 ( 8 ), 16 – 30.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorn, I. S. ( 2010 ). Teaching replays, teaching rehearsals, and re‐visions of practice: Learning from colleagues in a mathematics community. Teachers College Record, 112 ( 1 ), 225 – 259.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHorn, I. S., & Little, J. W. ( 2010 ). Attending to problems of practice: Routines and resources for professional learning in teachers' workplace interactions. American Educational Research Journal, 47 ( 1 ), 181 – 217.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHsi, S., Sabelli, N., Krajcik, J., Tinker, R. F., & Ellenbogen, K. ( 2006 ). Learning at the nanoscale: Research questions that the rapidly evolving interdisciplinarity of science poses for the learning sciences. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 1066 – 1072 ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHudicourt‐Barnes, J. ( 2003 ). The use of argumentation in Hatian Creole science classrooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73 ( 1 ), 73 – 93.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIngersoll, R. M. ( 2001 ). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Education Research Journal, 38 ( 3 ), 499 – 534.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacob, B. ( 2007 ). The challenge of staffing urban schools with urban teachers. The Future of Children, 17 ( 1 ), 129 – 153.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelly, A. E. ( 2004 ). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13 ( 1 ), 113 – 128.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKelly, J. A., Somlai, A. M., DiFranceisco, W. J., Otto‐Salaj, L. L., McAuliffe, T. L., Hackl, K. L., & Rompa, D. ( 2000 ). Bridging the gap between the science and service of HIV prevention: Transferring effective research‐based HIV prevention interventions to community AIDS service providers. American Journal of Public Health, 90 ( 7 ), 1082 – 1099.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKesidou, S., & Roseman, J. E. ( 2002 ). How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 ( 6 ), 522 – 549.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKnapp, M. S., & Plecki, M. L. ( 2001 ). Investing in the renewal of urban science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38 ( 10 ), 1089 – 1100.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrajcik, J. S., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. ( 2008 ). Learning‐goals‐driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project‐based pedagogy. Science Education, 92 ( 1 ), 1 – 32.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLatour, B. ( 1987 ). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, O. ( 2002 ). Science inquiry for elementary students from diverse backgrounds. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Review of research in education (pp. 23 – 69 ). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, O., & Luykx, A. ( 2005 ). Dilemmas in scaling up innovations in elementary science instruction with nonmainstream students. American Educational Research Journal, 42 ( 3 ), 411 – 438.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, O., Maerten‐Rivera, J., Penfield, R., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W. G. ( 2008 ). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first‐year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45 ( 1 ), 31 – 52.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemke, J. L. ( 1990 ). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLieberman, A. ( 2000 ). Networks as learning communities: Shaping the future of teacher development. Journal of Teacher Education, 51, 221 – 227.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLieberman, A., & Wood, D. ( 2002 ). Inside the National Writing Project: Connecting network learning and classroom teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin, H.‐T., & Fishman, B. J. ( 2004 ). Supporting the scaling of innovations: Guiding teacher adaptation of materials by making implicit structures explicit. In Y. B. Kafai, W. A. Sandoval, N. Enyedy, A. S. Nixon, & F. Herrera (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 617 ). Santa Monica, CA: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin, X., Schwartz, D. L., & Hatano, G. ( 2005 ). Toward teachers' adaptive metacognition. Educational Psychologist, 40 ( 4 ), 245 – 255.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLynch, S. J., Szesze, M., Pyke, C., & Kuipers, J. ( 2007 ). Scaling up highly‐rated science curriculum units for diverse student populations: Features that affect collaborative research and vice versa. In B. Schneider & S‐.K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale‐up in education: Issues in practice (Vol. II, pp. 91 – 122 ). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaerten‐Rivera, J., Penfield, R., Myers, N., Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. ( 2009 ). School and teacher predictors of science instruction practices with English language learners in urban elementary schools. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 15 ( 2 ), 93 – 118.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, J. R. ( 1989 ). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. London: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J., Fishman, B. J., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Revital, T. T. ( 2004 ). Inquiry‐based science in the middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41 ( 10 ), 1063 – 1080.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaull, K. E., Saldivar, M. G., Sumner, T. ( 2011 June). Understanding digital library adoption: A use diffusion approach. Paper presented at the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Ottawa, Canada.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcDonald, S.‐K., Keesler, V. A., Kauffmann, N. J., & Schneider, B. ( 2006 ). Scaling up exemplary interventions. Educational Researcher, 35 ( 3 ), 15 – 24.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcMunn, N., McColskey, W., & Butler, S. ( 2004 ). Building teacher capacity in classroom assessment to improve student learning. International Journal of Educational Policy, Research, & Practice, 4 ( 4 ), 25 – 48.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeans, B., Confrey, J., House, A., & Bhanot, R. ( 2008 ). STEM high schools: Specialized science, technology, engineering, and mathematics secondary schools in the United States. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMillen, D. R. ( 2000 ). Rapid ethnography: Time deepening strategies for HCI field research. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 280 – 286 ). New York, NY: ACM Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council.( 1996 ). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council.( 2000 ). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council.( 2001 ). Classroom assessment and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council.( 2007 ). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K‐8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council.( 2009 ). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council.( 2010 ). A framework for science education: Preliminary public draft. Washington, DC: Committee on Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, National Research Council.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Research Council.( 2011 ). A framework for K‐12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Research Council.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewmann, F. M., Smith, B., Allensworth, E., & Bryk, A. S. ( 2001 ). Instructional program coherence: What it is and why it should guide school improvement policy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23 ( 4 ), 297 – 321.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor, K., & Allen, A‐R. ( 2010 ). Learning as the organizing of social futures. In W. R. Penuel & K. O'Connor (Eds). Learning research as a human science. National Society for Studies in Education, 109 ( 1 ): 160 – 175.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor, K., & Penuel, W. R. ( 2010 ). Introduction: Principles of a human sciences approach to research on learning. In W. R. Penuel & K. O'Connor, (Eds). Learning research as a human science. National Society for Studies in Education, 109 ( 1 ): 1 – 16.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. ( 1993 ). Aligning academic talk and participation status through revoicing: Analysis of a classroom discourse strategy. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 24 ( 4 ), 318 – 355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Connor, M. C., & Michaels, S. ( 2011 ). Problematizing dialogic and authoritative discourse, their coding in classroom transcripts, and realization in the classroom. Paper presented at the ISCAR Congress, Rome, Italy.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO'Donnell, C. L. ( 2008 ). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K‐12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78 ( 1 ), 33 – 84.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOakes, J. ( 1990 ). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreference( 2010 ). Prepare and inspire: K‐12 education in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) for America's future. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePea, R. D., & Collins, A. ( 2008 ). Learning how to do science education: Four waves of reform. In Y. Kali, M. C. Linn, & J. E. Roseman (Eds.), Designing coherent science education (Vol. 3–12 ). New York: Teachers College Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePenuel, W. R., DeBarger, A. H. ( 2011 ). Supporting teacher learning to improve classroom assessment in science. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePenuel, W. R., & Gallagher, L. P. ( 2009 ). Comparing three approaches to preparing teachers to teach for deep understanding in Earth science: Short‐term impacts on teachers and teaching practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18 ( 4 ), 461 – 508.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePenuel, W. R., Gallagher, L. P., & Moorthy, S. ( 2011 ). Preparing teachers to design sequences of instruction in Earth science: A comparison of three professional development programs. American Educational Research Journal, 48 ( 4 ), 996 – 1025.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePenuel, W. R., McWilliams, H., McAuliffe, C., Benbow, A., Mably, C., & Hayden, M. M. ( 2009 ). Teaching for understanding in Earth science: Comparing impacts on planning and instruction in three professional development designs for middle school science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20 ( 5 ), 415 – 436.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReich, R. B. ( 2011 ). Aftershock: The next economy and America's future. New York: Vintage.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRethinam, V., Pyke, C., & Lynch, S. ( 2008 ). Using multi‐level analyses to study the effectiveness of science curriculum. Evaluation & Research in Education, 21 ( 1 ), 18 – 42.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosebery, A. ( 2005 ). “ What are we going to do next?” A case study of lesson planning. In R. Nemirovsky, A. Rosebery, B. Warren, & J. Solomon (Eds.), Everyday matters in mathematics and science: Studies of complex classroom events (pp. 299 – 328 ). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosebery, A., McIntyre, E., & Gonzales, N. ( 2001 ). Connecting students' cultures to instruction. In E. McIntyre, A. Rosebery, & N. Gonzales (Eds.), Classroom diversity: Connecting curriculum to students' lives (pp. 1 – 13 ). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosebery, A., Ogonowski, M., DiSchino, M., & Warren, B. ( 2010 ). “ The coat traps all your body heat”: Heterogeneity as fundamental to learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19 ( 3 ), 322 – 357.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosebery, A., & Warren, B. (Eds.).( 2008 ). Teaching science to English language learners. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRowan, B. ( 2002 ). The ecology of school improvement: Notes on the school improvement industry in the United States. Journal of Educational Change, 3 ( 3–4 ), 283 – 314.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.