Show simple item record

Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis

dc.contributor.authorCollette, Matthewen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-16T15:58:02Z
dc.date.available2012-11-02T18:56:24Zen_US
dc.date.issued2011-09en_US
dc.identifier.citationCollette, Matthew (2011). "Hull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysis." Naval Engineers Journal 123(3). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90260>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0028-1425en_US
dc.identifier.issn1559-3584en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90260
dc.description.abstractAs modular weapon systems allow cost‐effective upgrades of a vessel's war‐fighting capability, the degradation of the difficult‐to‐upgrade structure of the vessel may soon become one of the key drivers of vessel retirement and lifecycle maintenance costing. Existing structural design approaches are reviewed, along with recent developments in this field. It is argued that recent research has produced a number of ad hoc metrics for structural design, such as producability; however, to truly address the needs of future ship design teams it is necessary to integrate several such metrics in a systems‐engineering view to evaluate how the structural system contributes to the overall capabilities and costs of a proposed vessel. Potential architectures for this approach are discussed, along with key shortcomings. A comparative example is given for structural fatigue of a strength deck under global bending loading, comparing the traditional design approach with a systems‐oriented view.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.titleHull Structures as a System: Supporting Lifecycle Analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNaval Architecture and Marine Engineeringen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumNaval Architecture and Marine Engineering Department of the University of Michiganen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90260/1/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1559-3584.2011.00329.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceNaval Engineers Journalen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarentine, J., “A process‐based cost estimating tool for ship structural designs.” Available at http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/10557. Accessed October 22, 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollette, M., M. Cooper, A. Mesbahi, and A. Incecik, “An integrated reliability, risk analysis, and cost model for preliminary structural design: a module of the SAFETY@SPEED design methodology,” In FAST 2005. Eighth International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation. St. Petersburg, Russia, 27–30 June 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCollette, M. and A. Incecik, “ An approach for reliability‐based fatigue design of welded joints on aluminunn high‐speed vessels,” Journal of Ship Research, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 85 – 98, 2006.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHess, P., “Reliability‐based operational performance metrics for ship structures.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Maryland, 2002.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoppe, H., “ Goal‐based standards—a new approach to the international regulation of ship construction,” WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 169 – 180, 2005.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoenig, P., D. Nalchajian, and J. Hootman, “ Ship service life and naval force structure,” Naval Engineers Journal, Vol. 121, No. 1, pp. 69 – 77, 2009.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNATO, “ANEP 77 Naval Ship Code.” North Atlantic Treaty Organization, July 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOPNAV, “Operational Availability Handbook.” Department of the Navy, Office of the Chief of Naval Operations Instruction, 1987.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRigo, P., “ Least‐cost structural optimization oriented preliminary design,” Journal of Ship Production, Vol. 17, pp. 202 – 215, 2001.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSage, A.P. and J.E. Armstrong Jr., Introduction to systems engineering, 1st ed., Wiley‐Interscience, New York, 2000.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSames, P.C. and R. Hamann, “ Towards environmental risk acceptance criteria,” In 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE 2008, June 9, 2008–June 13, 2008, Estoril, Portugal. ASME Vol. 2, pp. 277 – 283, 2008.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSielski, R., SSC‐452 Aluminum structure design and fabrication guide, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC, 2007.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTuran, O., A.İ. Ölçer, I. Lazakis, P. Rigo, and J.D. Caprace, “ Maintenance/repair and production‐oriented life cycle cost/earning model for ship structural optimisation during conceptual design stage,” Ships and Offshore Structures, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 107 – 125, 2009.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.