Updating risk prediction tools: A case study in prostate cancer
dc.contributor.author | Ankerst, Donna P. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Koniarski, Tim | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Liang, Yuanyuan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Leach, Robin J. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Feng, Ziding | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sanda, Martin G. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Partin, Alan W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, Daniel W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kagan, Jacob | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sokoll, Lori | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wei, John T. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thompson, Ian M. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-03-16T16:00:19Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-03-04T15:29:55Z | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2012-01 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ankerst, Donna P.; Koniarski, Tim; Liang, Yuanyuan; Leach, Robin J.; Feng, Ziding; Sanda, Martin G.; Partin, Alan W.; Chan, Daniel W.; Kagan, Jacob; Sokoll, Lori; Wei, John T.; Thompson, Ian M. (2012). "Updating risk prediction tools: A case study in prostate cancer." Biometrical Journal 54(1): 127-142. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90338> | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0323-3847 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1521-4036 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90338 | |
dc.description.abstract | Online risk prediction tools for common cancers are now easily accessible and widely used by patients and doctors for informed decision‐making concerning screening and diagnosis. A practical problem is as cancer research moves forward and new biomarkers and risk factors are discovered, there is a need to update the risk algorithms to include them. Typically, the new markers and risk factors cannot be retrospectively measured on the same study participants used to develop the original prediction tool, necessitating the merging of a separate study of different participants, which may be much smaller in sample size and of a different design. Validation of the updated tool on a third independent data set is warranted before the updated tool can go online. This article reports on the application of Bayes rule for updating risk prediction tools to include a set of biomarkers measured in an external study to the original study used to develop the risk prediction tool. The procedure is illustrated in the context of updating the online Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator to incorporate the new markers %freePSA and [‐2]proPSA measured on an external case–control study performed in Texas, U.S.. Recent state‐of‐the art methods in validation of risk prediction tools and evaluation of the improvement of updated to original tools are implemented using an external validation set provided by the U.S. Early Detection Research Network. | en_US |
dc.publisher | WILEY‐VCH Verlag | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Calibration | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Discrimination | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Risk Prediction | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Validation | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Net Benefit | en_US |
dc.title | Updating risk prediction tools: A case study in prostate cancer | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Physics | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Biological Chemistry | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | en_US |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Phone: +49‐89‐289‐17443, Fax: +49‐89‐289‐17435 | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore, MD, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Urology, Harvard Medical School, and Prostate Center, Urology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 330 Brookline MA 02215, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Program in Biostatistics and Biomathematics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA 98109, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | International Real Estate Business School, University of Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Epidemiology/Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA), 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX, USA 78229, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA), 7703 Floyd Curl Dr., San Antonio, TX, USA 78229, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Cancer Biomarkers Research Group, Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Department of Mathematics, Technische Universitaet Muenchen, Unit M4, Boltzmannstr 3, 85748 Garching b. Munich, Germany | en_US |
dc.identifier.pmid | 22095849 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90338/1/127_ftp.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/bimj.201100062 | en_US |
dc.identifier.source | Biometrical Journal | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Parekh, D. J., Ankerst, D. P., Higgins, B. A., Hernandez, J., Canby‐Hagino, E., Brand, T., Troyer, D., Leach, R. and Thompson, I. M. ( 2006 ). External validation of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator. Urology 68, 1152 – 1155. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Ankerst, D. P., Groskopf, J., Day, J. R., Blase, A., Rittenhouse, H., Pollock, B. H., Tangen, C., Parekh, D., Leach, R. J. and Thompson, I. ( 2008 ). Predicting prostate cancer risk through incorporation of prostate cancer gene 3. Journal of Urology 180, 1303 – 1308. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Anscombe, F. J. ( 1967 ) Topics in the investigation of linear relations fitted by the method of least squares (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 29, 1 – 52. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Chatfield, C. ( 1995 ). Model uncertainty, data mining, and statistical inference (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A 158, 419 – 466. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | DeLong, E. R., DeLong, D. M. and Clarke‐Pearson, D. L. ( 1988 ). Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44, 837 – 845. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Eyre, S. J., Ankerst, D. P., Wei, J. T., Nair, P. V., Regan, M. M., Bueti, G., Tang, J., Rubin, M. A., Kearney, M., Thompson, I. M. and Sanda, M. G. ( 2009 ). Validation in a multiple urology practice setting of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial calculator for predicting prostate cancer detection. Journal of Urology 182, 2653 – 2658. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Frühwirth‐Schnatter, S. and Pyne, S. ( 2010 ). Bayesian interface for finite mixtures of univariate and multivariate skew‐normal and skew‐t distributions. Biostatistics 11, 317 – 336. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gail, M. H., Brinton, L. A., Byar, D. P., Corle, D. K., Green, S. B., Schairer, C. and Mulvihill, J. J. ( 1989 ). Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 81, 1879 – 1886. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gail, M. H., Costantino, J. P., Pee, D., Bondy, M., Newman, L., Selvan, M., Anderson, G. L., Malone, K. E., Marchbanks, P. A., McCaskill‐Stevens, W., Norman, S. A., Simon, M. S., Spirtas, R., Usin, G. and Bernstein, L. ( 2007 ). Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 99, 1782 – 1792. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Greenland, S. ( 2008 ). The need for reorientation toward cost‐effective prediction: comments on ‘Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond’ by M. J. et al., Statistics in Medicine. Statistics in Medicine 27, 199 – 206. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Grundy, S. M., Cleeman, J. I., Merz, C. N. B., Brewer, B. Jr., Clark, L. T., Hunninghake, D. B., Pasternak, R. C., Smith, S. C. and Stone, N. J. for the Coordinating Committee of the National Cholesterol Education Program ( 2004 ). Implications of recent clinical trials for the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines. Circulation 110, 227 – 239. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gu, W. and Pepe, M. S. ( 2009 ). Estimating the capacity for improvement in risk prediction with a marker. Biostatistics 10, 172 – 186. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Gu, W. and Pepe, M. S. ( 2011 ). Estimating the diagnostic likelihood ratio of a continuous marker. Biostatistics 12, 87 – 101. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Hernandez, D. J., Han, M., Humphreys, E. B., Mangold, L. A., Taneja, S. S., Childs, S. J., Bartsch, G. and Partin, A. W. ( 2009 ). Predicting the outcome of prostate biopsy: comparison of a novel logistic regression‐based model, the prostate cancer risk calculator, and prostate‐specific antigen level alone. British Journal Urology International 103, 609 – 614. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Izenman, A. J. ( 2008 ). Modern Multivariate Statistical Techniques. Springer, New York. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Janssen, K. J. M., Donders, A. R. T., Harrell, F. E. Jr., Vergouwe, Y., Chen, Q., Grobbee, D. E. and Moons, K. G. M. ( 2010 ). Missing covariate data in medical research: To impute is better than to ignore. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 63, 721 – 727. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Janssens, A. C. J. W., Deng, Y., Borsboom, G. J. J. M., Eijkemans, M. J. C., Habbema, J. D. F. and Steyerberg, E. W. ( 2005 ). A new logistic regression approach for the evaluation of diagnostic test results. Medical Decision Making 25, 168 – 177. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Lemeshow, S. and Hosmer, D. W. Jr., ( 1982 ). A review of goodness of fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. American Journal of Epidemiology 115, 92 – 106. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Liang, Y., Ankerst, D. P., Ketchum, N. S., Ercole, B., Shah, G., Shaughnessy, J. D. Jr., Leach, R. J. and Thompson, I. M. ( 2011 ). Prospective evaluation of operating characteristics of prostate cancer detection biomarkers. Journal of Urology 185, 104 – 110. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Nguyen, C. T., Yu, C., Moussa A., Kattan, M. W. and Jones, J. S. ( 2010 ). Performance of prostate cancer prevention trial risk calculator in a contemporary cohort screened for prostate cancer and diagnosed by extended prostate biopsy. Journal of Urology 183, 529 – 533. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pencina, M. J., D'Agostino Sr., R. B., D'Agostino Jr., R. B., Vasan, R. S. ( 2008 ). Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Statistics in Medicine 27, 157 – 172. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Pepe, M. S., Etzioni, R., Feng, Z., Potter, J. D., Thompson, M. L., Thornquist, M., Winget, M. and Yasui, Y. ( 2001 ). Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 93, 1054 – 1061. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Skates, S. J., Pauler, D. K. and Jacobs, I. J. ( 2001 ). Screening based on the risk of cancer calculation from Bayesian hierarchical change‐point models of longitudinal markers. Journal of the American Statistical Association 96, 429 – 439. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Sokoll, L. J., Sanda, M. G., Feng, Z., Kagan, J., Mizrahi, I. A., Broyles, D. L., Partin, A. W., Srivasta, S., Thompson, I. M., Wei, J. T., Zhang, Z. and Chan, D. W. ( 2010 ). A prospective, multicenter National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network study of [‐2]proPSA: improving prostate cancer detection and correlating with cancer aggressiveness. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention 19, 1193 – 1200. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Steyerberg, E. W. and Vickers, A. J. ( 2008 ). Decision curve analysis: a discussion. Medical Decision Making 28, 146 – 149. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Steyerberg, E. W., Vickers, A. J., Cook, N. R., Gerds, T., Gonen, M., Obuchowski, N., Pencina, M. J. and Kattan, M. W. ( 2010 ). Assessing the performance of prediction models, a framework for traditional and novel measures. Epidemiology 21, 128 – 138. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Steyerberg, E. W. ( 2010 ). Clinical Prediction Models. Springer, New York. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Thompson, I. M., Ankerst, D. P., Chi, C., Lucia, M. S., Goodman, P., Crowley, J. J., Parnes, H. L. and Coltman Jr., C. A. ( 2005 ). The operating characteristics of prostate‐specific antigen in a population with initial PSA of 3. 0 ng/mL or lower. Journal of the American Medical Association 294, 66 – 70. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Thompson, I. M., Ankerst, D. P., Chi, C., Goodman, P. J., Tangen, C. M., Lucia, M. S., Feng, Z., Parnes, H. L. and Coltman Jr., C. A. ( 2006 ). Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 98, 529 – 534. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | van Buuren, S. ( 2007 ). Multiple imputation of discrete and continuous data by fully conditional specification. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 16, 219 – 242. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Vickers, A. J. and Elkin, E. B. ( 2006 ). Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Medical Decision Making 26, 565 – 574. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Wolf, A. M. D., Wender, R. C., Etzioni, R., Thompson, I. M., D'Amico, A. V., Volk, R. J., Brooks, D. D., Dash, C., Guessous, I., Andrews, K., DeSantis, C. and Smith, R. A. ( 2010 ). American Cancer Society guideline for the early detection of prostate cancer: update 2010. CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians 60, 70 – 98. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citedreference | Yates, J. F. ( 1982 ). External correspondence: decomposition of the mean probability score. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 30, 132 – 156 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.