Show simple item record

Atmospheric CO 2 and O 3 alter competition for soil nitrogen in developing forests

dc.contributor.authorZak, Donald R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKubiske, Mark E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPregitzer, Kurt S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBurton, Andrew J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-04T18:42:38Z
dc.date.available2013-06-11T19:15:41Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationZak, Donald R.; Kubiske, Mark E.; Pregitzer, Kurt S.; Burton, Andrew J. (2012). "Atmospheric CO 2 and O 3 alter competition for soil nitrogen in developing forests." Global Change Biology 18(4): 1480-1488. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90539>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1354-1013en_US
dc.identifier.issn1365-2486en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90539
dc.description.abstractPlant growth responses to rising atmospheric CO 2 and O 3 vary among genotypes and between species, which could plausibly influence the strength of competitive interactions for soil N . Ascribable to the size‐symmetric nature of belowground competition, we reasoned that differential growth responses to CO 2 and O 3 should shift as juvenile individuals mature, thereby altering competitive hierarchies and forest composition. In a 12‐year‐long forest FACE experiment, we used tracer 15 N and whole‐plant N content to assess belowground competitive interactions among five P opulus tremuloides genotypes, between a single P . tremuloides genotype and B etula papryrifera , as well as between the same single P . tremuloides genotype and A cer saccharum . Under elevated CO 2 , the amount of soil N and 15 N obtained by the P . tremuloides genotype common to each community was contingent on the nature of belowground competition. When this genotype competed with its congeners, it obtained equivalent amounts of soil N and tracer 15 N under ambient and elevated CO 2 ; however, its acquisition of soil N under elevated CO 2 increased by a significant margin when grown in competition with B . papyrifera (+30%) and A . saccharum (+60%). In contrast, elevated O 3 had no effect on soil N and 15 N acquisition by the P . tremuloides genotype common in each community, regardless of competitive interactions. Under elevated CO 2 , the rank order of N acquisition among P . tremuloides genotypes shifted over time, indicating that growth responses to CO 2 change during ontogeny; this was not the case under elevated O 3 . In the aspen‐birch community, the competitive advantage elevated CO 2 initially conveyed on birch diminished over time, whereas maple was a poor competitor for soil N in all regards. The extent to which elevated CO 2 and O 3 will shape the genetic structure and composition of future forests is, in part, contingent on the time‐dependent effects of belowground competition on plant growth response.en_US
dc.publisherU.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service North Central Experiment Station, General Technical Report NC‐214en_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherInterspecific Competitionen_US
dc.subject.otherSoil Nen_US
dc.subject.otherBelowground Competitionen_US
dc.subject.otherIntraspecific Competitionen_US
dc.subject.otherElevated O 3en_US
dc.subject.otherElevated CO 2en_US
dc.titleAtmospheric CO 2 and O 3 alter competition for soil nitrogen in developing forestsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeology and Earth Sciencesen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90539/1/gcb2596.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02596.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceGlobal Change Biologyen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePfleeger TG, Plocher M, Bichel P ( 2010 ) Response of pioneer plant communities to elevated ozone exposure. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 138, 116 – 126.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrooker RW ( 2006 ) Plant‐plant interactions and environmental change. New Phytologist, 171, 271 – 284.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCahill JF, Casper BB ( 2000 ) Investigating the relationship between neighbor root biomass and belowground competition: field evidence for symmetric competition belowground. Oikos, 90, 311 – 320.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasper BB, Jackson RB ( 1997 ) Plant competition belowground. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic,s, 28, 545 – 570.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDickson RE, Lewin KF, Isebrands JG et al. ( 2000 ) Forest Atmosphere Carbon Transfer Storage‐II (FACTS II) ‐ The Aspen Free‐Air CO 2 and O 3 Enrichment (FACE) Project: An Overview. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service North Central Experiment Station, General Technical Report NC‐214, St. Paul, MN.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFraser EC, Landhäusser, Leiffers VJ ( 2006 ) Does mechanical site preparation affect trembling aspen density and growth 9‐12 years after treatment? New Forests, 32, 299 – 306.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIsebrands JG, McDonald EP, Kruger E et al. ( 2001 ) Growth of Populus tremuloides clones to interacting elevated carbon dioxide and tropospheric ozone. Environmental Pollution, 115, 359 – 371.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKarnosky DF, Pregitzer KS, Zak DR et al. ( 2005 ) Scaling ozone responses of forest trees to the ecosystem level in a changing climate. Plant Cell Environment, 28, 965 – 981.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing JS, Kubiske ME, Pregitzer KS et al. ( 2005 ) Tropospheric O 3 compromises net primary production in young stands of trembling aspen, paper birch and sugar maple in response to elevated atmospheric CO 2. New Phytologist, 168, 623 – 635.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKneeshaw DD, Kobe RK, Coates D, Messier C ( 2006 ) Sapling size influences shad tolerance rankings among southern boreal tree species. Journal of Ecology, 94, 471 – 480.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKozovits AR, Matyssek R, Blaschke H, Göttlein A, Grams TEE ( 2005 ) Competition increasingly dominates the responsiveness of juvenile beech and spruce to elevated CO 2 and/or O 3 concentrations throughout two subsequent growing seasons. Global Change Biology, 11, 1387 – 1401.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKruger EL, Reich PB ( 1997 ) Response of hardwood regeneration to fire in mesic forest openings. III. Whole‐plant growth, biomass distribution, nitrogen and carbohydrate relations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27, 1841 – 1850.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKubiske ME, Quinn VS, Heilman W E, Marquardt PE, Karnosky DE ( 2007 ) Effects of elevated atmospheric CO 2 and/or O 3 on intra‐ and interspecific competition. Plant Biology, 9, 342 – 355.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLau JA, Shaw RG, Reich PB, Tiffin P ( 2010 ) Species interactions in a changing environment: elevated CO 2 alters the ecological and potential evolutionary consequences of competition. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 12, 435 – 455.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiu X, Kozovits AR, Grams TEE et al. ( 2004 ) Competition modifies effects of enhanced ozone/carbon dioxide concentrations on carbohydrate and biomass accumulation in juvenile Norway spruce and European beech. Tree Physiology, 24, 1045 – 1055.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMulak T, Landhäusser SM, Leiffers VT ( 2006 ) Effects of timing of cleaning and residual density on regeneration of juvenile aspen stands. Forest Ecology & Management, 232, 198 – 204.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNiinemets U ( 2006 ) The controversy over traits conferring shade‐tolerance in trees: ontogenetic changes revisited. Journal of Ecology, 94, 464 – 470.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNovak K, Schaub M, Fuhrer J et al. ( 2008 ) Ozone effects on visable foliar injury and growth of Fagus sylvatica and Virburnum lantana seedlings grown in monoculture or in mixture. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 62, 212 – 220.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoorter H, Navas M‐L ( 2003 ) Plant growth and competition at elevated CO 2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytologist, 157, 175 – 198.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSack L, Grubb PJ ( 2001 ) Why do species of wood seedlings change rank in relative growth rate between low and high irradiance. Functional Ecology, 15, 145 – 154.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShrestha A, Grantz DA ( 2005 ) Ozone impacts on competition between tomato and yellow nutsedge: above‐ and below‐ground effects. Crop Science, 45, 1587 – 1595.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVapaavuori E, Holopainen JK, Holopainen T et al. ( 2009 ) Rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration partially masks the negative effects of elevated O 3 on silver birch. Ambio, 38, 418 – 424.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeiner J, Wright DB, Castro S ( 1997 ) Symmetry of belowground competition between Kochia scoparia invididuals. Oikos, 79, 85 – 91.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZak DR, Holmes WE, Pregitzer KS et al. ( 2007 ) Belowground competition and the response of developing forest communities to atmospheric CO 2 and O 3. Global Change Biology, 13, 2230 – 2238.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZak DR, Kubiske ME, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ ( 2011 ) Forest productivity under elevated CO 2 and O 3: positive feedbacks to soil N cycling sustain decade‐long NPP enhancement by CO 2. Ecology Letters, doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01692.x.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAinsworth EA, Long SP ( 2005 ) What have we learned from 15 years of free‐air CO 2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta‐analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO 2. New Phytologist, 165, 351 – 372.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartelheimer M, Steinlein T, Beyschlag W ( 2008 ) 15 N‐nitrate‐labeling demonstrates a size symmetric competitive effect on belowground resource uptake. Plant Ecology, 199, 243 – 253.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerntson GM, Wayne PM ( 2000 ) Characterizing the size dependence of resource acquisition within crowded plant populations. Ecology, 81, 1072 – 1085.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBradley KL, Pregitzer KS ( 2007 ) Ecosystem assembly and terrestrial carbon balance under elevated CO 2. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 22, 538 – 547.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.