View Item 

Show simple item record

Individual Risk
dc.contributor.authorStern, Ralph H.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-04T18:42:39Z
dc.date.available2013-06-11T19:15:42Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-04en_US
dc.identifier.citationStern, Ralph H. (2012). "Individual Risk." The Journal of Clinical Hypertension 14(4). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90540>en_US
dc.identifier.issn1524-6175en_US
dc.identifier.issn1751-7176en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90540
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.titleIndividual Risken_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOncology and Hematologyen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumFrom the Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine and Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MIen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90540/1/j.1751-7176.2012.00592.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00592.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceThe Journal of Clinical Hypertensionen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStern RH. The discordance of individual risk estimates and the reference class problem. arXiv:1001.2499v1[q‐bio.QM]. http://www.arXiv.org. Accessed January 30, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurm HS, Kaufman SR, Smith DE, et al. Different risk models predict markedly different probability of death for the same patient: implications of using risk models for individual patients. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32 ( suppl 1 ): 742.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePepe M. Rejoinder to Nancy Cook’s comment on “measures to summarize and compare the predictive capacity of markers.” Int J Biostat. 2010; 6: Article 25. http://www.bepress.com/ijb/vol6/iss1/25. Accessed January 30, 2012.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePepe MS. Problems with reclassification methods for evaluating prediction models. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173: 1327 – 1335.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVon Mises R. Probability, Statistics and Truth. New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc; 1981: 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMihaescu M, van Zitteren M, van Hoek M, et al. Improvement of risk prediction by genomic profiling: reclassicfication measures versus the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 172: 353 – 361.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKannel WB, D’Agostino RB, Sullivan L, Wilson PWF. Concept and usefulness of cardiovascular risk profiles. Am Heart J. 2004; 148: 16 – 26.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMihaescu R, van Hoek M, Sijbrands EJG, et al. Evaluation of risk prediction updates from commercial genome‐wide scans. Genet Med. 2009; 11: 588 – 594.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelfand M, Buckley DI, Freeman M, et al. Emerging risk factors for coronary heart disease: a summary of systematic reviews conducted for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151: 496 – 507.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Malley PG, Redberg RF. Risk refinement, reclassification, and treatment thresholds in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease incremental progress but significant gaps remain. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170: 1602 – 1603.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcTiernan A, Kuniyuki A, Yasui Y, et al. Comparisons of two breast cancer risk estimates in women with a family history of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemol Biomarkers Prev. 1997; 50: 547 – 556.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEuhus DM, Leitch AM, Huth JF, Peters GN. Limitations of the Gail model in the specialized breast cancer risk assessment clinic. Breast J. 2002; 8: 23 – 27.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, et al. Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease, application to clinical and public health practice, a statement for healthcare professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2003; 107: 499 – 511.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKooter AJ, Kostense PJ, Groenewold J, et al. Integrating information from novel risk factors with calculated risks the critical impact of risk factor prevalence. Circulation. 2011; 124: 741 – 745.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeinstein AR. Multivariable Analysis an Introduction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1996:566.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilson P, Greenberg H. Interview of William Kannel, MD. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010; 53: 4 – 9.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTruett J, Cornfield J, Kannel W. A multivariate analysis of the risk of coronary heart disease in framingham. J Chronic Dis. 1967; 20: 511 – 524.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Heart Association. Coronary Risk Handbook: Estimating Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Daily Practice. New York, NY: American Heart Association; 1973.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLemeshow S, Klar J, Teres D. Outcome prediction for individual intensive care patients: useful, misused, or abused? Intensive Care Med. 1995; 21: 770 – 776.en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1751-7176.2012.00592.x.pdf
Size:
160.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.