View Item 

Show simple item record

Against Nature: How Arguments about the Naturalness of Marriage Privilege Heterosexuality
dc.contributor.authorCole, Elizabeth Ruthen_US
dc.contributor.authorAvery, Lanice R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDodson, Catherineen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Kevin D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-04T18:42:49Z
dc.date.available2013-05-01T17:24:43Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-03en_US
dc.identifier.citationCole, Elizabeth R.; Avery, Lanice R.; Dodson, Catherine; Goodman, Kevin D. (2012). "Against Nature: How Arguments about the Naturalness of Marriage Privilege Heterosexuality." Journal of Social Issues 68(1). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90547>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-4537en_US
dc.identifier.issn1540-4560en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90547
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Incen_US
dc.titleAgainst Nature: How Arguments about the Naturalness of Marriage Privilege Heterosexualityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSocial Worken_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMichigan State Universityen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90547/1/j.1540-4560.2012.01735.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-4560.2012.01735.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Social Issuesen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNewman, S. A. ( 2004 ). Use and abuse of social science in the same‐sex marriage debate. The New York Law School Law Review, 49, 537 – 560.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLocke, A. ( 2009 ). ‘Natural versus taught’: Competing discourses in antenatal breastfeeding workshops. Journal of Health Psychology, 14 ( 3 ), 435 – 446. doi: 10.1177/1359105309102200en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLock, M., & Kaufert, P. A. (Eds.) ( 1998 ). Pragmatic women and body politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin, K. A., & Kazyak, E. ( 2009 ). Hetero‐romantic love and heterosexiness in children's G‐rated films. Gender & Society, 23, 315 – 336. doi: 10.1177/0891243209335635en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcMillan, J. ( 2004 ). Doing it by the book: Natural tales of marriage and sex in contemporary Chinese marriage manuals. Sex Education, 4 ( 3 ), 203 – 215. doi: 10.1080/1468181042000243312en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcIntosh, P. ( 1988 ). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women's studies (Working Paper No. 189). Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMontgomery, S., & Stewart, A. J. ( 2012 ). Privileged allies: Resistance to heteronormativity and lesbian and gay rights activism. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 162 – 177.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Conference of State Legislatures ( 2011 ). Same‐Sex Marriage, Civil Unions and Domestic Partnerships. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/IssuesResearch/HumanServices/SameSexMarriage/tabid/16430/Default.aspx on October 29, 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNovkov, J. ( 2008 ). The miscegenation/same‐sex marriage analogy: What can we learn from legal history? Law & Social Inquiry, 33, 345 – 386.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePascoe, P. ( 2009 ). What comes naturally: Miscegenation law and the making of race in America. New York: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePratto, F. & Stewart, A. L. ( 2012 ). Group dominance and the half‐blindness of privilege. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 28 – 45.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin, G. ( 1984 ). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In C. S. Vance, (Ed.), Pleasure & danger: Exploring female sexuality (pp. 267 – 319 ). Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSamar, V. J. ( 2005 ). Privacy and the debate over same‐sex marriage versus unions. DePaul Law Review, 54, 783 – 804.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSemetko, H., & Valkenburg, P. ( 2000 ). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50, 93 – 109. doi: 10.1111/j.1460‐2466.2000.tb02843.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSomerville, S. ( 2005 ). Queer Loving. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 11, 355 – 370. doi: 10.1215/10642684‐11‐3‐335en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSullivan‐Blum, C. R. ( 2006 ). “The natural order of creation”: Naturalizing discourses in the Christian same‐sex marriage debate. Anthropologica, 48, 203 – 215. doi: 10.2307/25605311en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTiefer, L. ( 1995 ). Sexual biology and the symbolism of the natural. In Tiefer, L. (Ed.), Sex is not a natural act and other essays (pp. 31 – 40 ). Boulder, Co.: Westview Press, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Zyl, M. ( 2011 ). Are same‐sex marriages unAfrican? Same‐sex relationships and belonging in post‐apartheid South Africa. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 335 – 357. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‐4560.2011.01701.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams, R. ( 1983 ). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society, Revised Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinter, D. G. ( 1973 ). The power motive. New York, NY: Free Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, C. J. ( 2003 ). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 139 – 166. doi: 10.1037/0033‐2909.129.1.139en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBennett, T., Grossberg, L., & Morris, M. ( 2005 ). New keywords: A revised vocabulary of culture and society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlumenfeld, W. J. & Jaekel, K. ( 2012 ). Exploring levels of Christian privilege awareness among pre‐Service teachers. Journal of Social Issues, 68, 128 – 144.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCahill, C. M. ( 2004 ). Same‐sex marriage, slippery slope rhetoric and the politics of disgust: A critical perspective on contemporary family discourse and the incest taboo. Northwestern University Law Review, 99, 1543 – 1611.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen, C. J. ( 1997 ). Punks, bulldaggers and welfare queens: The radical potential of queer politics? GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 3, 437 – 465. doi: 10.1215/10642684‐3‐4‐437en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCott, N. F. ( 2000 ). Public vows: A history of marriage and the nation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrehan, M. G., & Rickenbacker, K. ( 2006 –07). The changing debate on same‐sex marriage in the United States. Michigan Feminist Studies, 20, 1 – 17.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurtis, M. K., & Gilreath, S. ( 2008 ). Tranforming teenagers into oral sex felons: The persistence of the crime against nature after Lawrence v. Texas. Wake Forest Law Review, 43, 155 – 221.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEditor & Publisher international Yearbook. ( 2008 ). New York: Editor & Publisher Co.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEidelman, S., Crandall, C., & Pattershall, J. ( 2009 ). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 765 – 775. doi: 10.1037/a0017058en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarrow, K. ( 2007 ). Is gay marriage anti‐Black? Retrieved from http://www.nathanielturner.com/isgaymarriageantiblack.htm on December 16, 2010.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFingerhut, A. W., Riggle, E. D. B., & Rostosky, S. S. ( 2011 ). Same‐sex marriage: The social and psychological implications of policy and debates. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 225 – 241. doi: 10.1111/j.1540‐4560.2011.01695.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriedrich, J. ( 2005 ). Naturalistic fallacy errors in lay interpretations of psychological science: Data and reflections on the Rind, Tromovitch and Baserman (1998) controversy. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 59 – 70. doi: 10.1207/s15324834basp2701_6en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGirgis, S., George, R., & Anderson, R. T. ( 2010 ). What is marriage? Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy, 34, 245 – 287.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreene, B. ( 2009 ). The use and abuse of religious beliefs in dividing and conquering between socially marginalized groups: The same‐sex marriage debate. American Psychologist, 64, 698 – 709. doi: 10.1037/0003‐066X.64.8.698en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGunson, J. S. ( 2010 ). “More natural but less normal”: Reconsidering medicalisation and agency through women's accounts of menstrual suppression. Social Science & Medicine, 71 ( 7 ), 1324 – 1331. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.06.041en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHodson, G., & Costello, K. ( 2007 ). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18, 691 – 698. doi: 10.1111/j.1467‐9280.2007.01962.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoltz, P., & Wagner, W. ( 2009 ). Essentialism and attribution of monstrosity in racist discourse: Right‐wing Internet postings about Africans and Jews. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 19, 411 – 425. doi: 10.1002/casp.1005en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIn re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal. 4th 757, 183 P. 3d 384, 76 Cal. Rptr. 3d 683, 2008 Cal. LEXIS 5247 ( 2008 ).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, G. ( 2009 ). We’ve heard this before: The legacy of interracial marriage bans and the implications for today's marriage equality debates. Vermont Law Review, 34, 277 – 289.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKitzinger, C., & Wilkinson, S. ( 2004 ) Social advocacy for equal marriage: The politics of ‘rights’ and the psychology of ‘mental health’. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 4, 173 – 194. doi: 10.1111/j.1530‐2415.2004.00040.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLewis, G. B. & Gossett, C. W. ( 2008 ). Changing public opinion on same‐sex marriage: The case of California, Politics & Policy, 30, 4 – 30. doi: 10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2007.00092.xen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi, X., & Liu, X. ( 2010 ). Framing and coverage of same‐sex marriage in U.S. newspapers. Harvard Journal of Communications, 21, 72 – 91. doi: 10.1080/10646170903501161en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
j.1540-4560.2012.01735.x.pdf
Size:
542.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.