Show simple item record

An Assessment if Institutional Relationships at the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary

dc.contributor.authorGeiger, Kristina
dc.contributor.authorGershman, David
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Eric
dc.contributor.authorWenger, Maggie
dc.contributor.advisorWondolleck, Julia
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-18T13:31:01Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2012-04-18T13:31:01Z
dc.date.issued2012-04
dc.date.submitted2012-04
dc.identifier213en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90863
dc.description.abstractCollaborative and coordinated management is necessary for successful ecosystem management, especially in marine ecosystems that cross jurisdictional lines. Agencies at the state and federal level recognize the need for effective institutional relationships. The Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary (OCNMS) identified collaborative and coordinated management as a priority in its 2011 Final Management Plan and Environmental Assessment. To reach its goal of achieving effective collaborative and coordinated management, OCNMS commissioned an external assessment of its institutional relationships. This assessment consisted of a literature review of standards for measuring collaboration in natural resource contexts, interviews with OCNMS staff and current key institutional partners, and a survey of individuals, organizations and tribes that work with OCNMS. The assessment determined that OCNMS has built a strong foundation for collaboration through two collaborative forums, projects and policies that address important issues for partners, and positive interactions between partners and OCNMS staff. Individuals feel they are working on issues important to their organizations and for the most part they value opportunities to share their priorities and learn about emerging issues, and they appreciate the efforts of OCNMS staff. Individuals in the network of relationships represent a wide range of institutions with different expectations for engagement and different criteria for what characterizes successful collaboration. OCNMS has complex and sometimes strained relationships with the four Coastal Treaty Tribes. OCNMS also faces challenges commonly found in other collaborative processes – constraints on individuals’ time, shortages of funding and staff support, communication challenges, and divergent goals among individuals. Still, the relationships have enabled notable accomplishments that include regulations to protect marine resources, joint projects related to research and education, and a ready network for communication and feedback.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectCollaborative Managementen_US
dc.subjectMarineen_US
dc.subjectTribal Engagementen_US
dc.subjectEvaluationen_US
dc.titleAn Assessment if Institutional Relationships at the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuaryen_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberna, na
dc.identifier.uniqnamegeigerken_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamegershmanen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnameerijrobeen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamewengermaen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90863/1/OCNMSAssessment_FINAL2012.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.