Show simple item record

Watershed Outreach Professionals' Behavior Change Practices, Challenges, and Needs: Insights and Recommendations for the Chesapeake Bay Trust

dc.contributor.authorKelly, Meghan
dc.contributor.authorLittle, Samuel
dc.contributor.authorPhelps, Kaitlin
dc.contributor.authorRoble, Carrie
dc.contributor.advisorZint, Michaela
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-19T13:55:43Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2012-04-19T13:55:43Z
dc.date.issued2012-04
dc.date.submitted2012-04
dc.identifier199en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90869
dc.description.abstractThis project was conducted in collaboration with a Maryland non-profit grant-making organization, the Chesapeake Bay Trust (CBT). The goal of the project was to determine how to assist local organizations in implementing environmental outreach programs (EOPs) that foster environmentally responsible behaviors (ERB) within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Based on findings from a review of conservation psychology literature, interviews with outreach program leaders, and observations of EOPs, the team designed and administered a survey to the CBT grant applicants (n=108, r=55%). The survey determined the EOP practices, challenges, and needs of these organizations. Survey results demonstrated that the majority of respondents’ organizations seek to motivate individuals to protect the Bay (97%) and that their EOPs have behavioral objectives (62%). Respondents reported that they motivate people in variety of ways, such as raising awareness (91 %). Their EOPs, however, also demonstrated misperceptions about how to achieve behavior change, for example suggesting that raising awareness will lead to ERB. Responses further revealed that many organizations are incorporating behavior change strategies and outreach best practices, such as targeting audiences (76%) and conducting internal evaluations (78%). Respondents, however, face challenges in implementing EOPs including: recruiting audiences not already environmentally motivated (53%); intentionally using behavior change strategies (52%); and developing EOPs with limited resources (48%). Finally, respondents felt their EOPs would most benefit from increased collaboration with other organizations (73%), opportunities to learn more about evaluation (63%), and training in how to incorporate academic research on ERB (53%). These survey results, as well as interview, observation, grant review, and presentation findings, led to the development of recommendations for the CBT and other funders interested in supporting EOPs to motivate ERB. Recommendations focused on facilitating effective program design include, addressing behavior change misconceptions, offering opportunities to learn more about behavior change, and developing outreach best practices skills, such as audience targeting and assessment. The recommendations also focus on ways to ensure that the needs of under-resourced grantees are met by encouraging collaboration and providing user-friendly, Bay-specific resources, such as the Rapid Assessment tool and guide to Strategies for Motivating Watershed Behavior created by the team.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectBehavior Changeen_US
dc.subjectChesapeake Bayen_US
dc.subjectWatersheden_US
dc.subjectOutreachen_US
dc.titleWatershed Outreach Professionals' Behavior Change Practices, Challenges, and Needs: Insights and Recommendations for the Chesapeake Bay Trusten_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberna, na
dc.identifier.uniqnamemeghankeen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamesdlittleen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamekjphelpsen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamecrobleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90869/1/Watershed Outreach Professionals' Behavior Change Practices, Challenges, and Needs[1].pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.