School Sustainability Rating Systems: Strengths, Limitations, and Future Prospects
dc.contributor.author | Dautremont-Smith, Julian | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Zint, Michaela | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-04-25T15:00:58Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2012-04-25T15:00:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012-04 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2012-04 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/90923 | |
dc.description.abstract | Increased interest in school sustainability has led to the emergence of a variety of rating systems to assess schools' contributions to sustainability. Such tools should have substantial potential to contribute to school sustainability efforts but the few studies completed to date suggest limited impacts. This paper asks whether weaknesses in the design and governance of school sustainability rating systems (SSRSs) may be to blame for the limited evidence of impact. Specifically, it reviews the extent to which 32 existing SSRSs have the following desirable characteristics: accountability mechanisms, comprehensive scope, multiple levels of achievement, open governance processes, performance-focused criteria, public reporting, and transparent criteria. Results show that most SSRSs have transparent criteria and offer multiple levels of recognition, but they also tend to have weak or non-existent accountability mechanisms, limited topical scope, closed governance processes, criteria that focus on strategies rather than performance, and minimal public reporting. Consolidation of SSRSs may help remedy these weaknesses by increasing capacity for managing an effective SSRS, improving brand recognition, facilitating benchmarking, and reducing duplication of effort within the school sustainability community. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Sustainability Rating Systems | en_US |
dc.subject | School Sustainability | en_US |
dc.subject | Sustainability Assessment | en_US |
dc.title | School Sustainability Rating Systems: Strengths, Limitations, and Future Prospects | en_US |
dc.type | Practicum | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | Master of Science (MS) | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Natural Resources and Environment | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | na, na | |
dc.identifier.uniqname | juliands | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/90923/1/School sustainability rating systems Strengths, limitations, and future prospects - final.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.