Show simple item record

Testing a student generated hypothesis using student data

dc.contributor.authorMcGowan, Herle M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVaughan, Joelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-05-21T15:46:37Z
dc.date.available2013-08-01T14:04:40Zen_US
dc.date.issued2012-06en_US
dc.identifier.citationMcGowan, Herle M.; Vaughan, Joel (2012). "Testing a student generated hypothesis using student data." Teaching Statistics 34(2). <http://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91094>en_US
dc.identifier.issn0141-982Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-9639en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/91094
dc.description.abstractWe describe an activity that allows students to experience the full process of a statistical investigation, from generating the research question, to collecting data and testing a hypothesis. Implementation of the activity is described both with and without use of clickers, handheld remotes that allow instant data collection.en_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.en_US
dc.subject.otherClickersen_US
dc.subject.otherStatistical Thinkingen_US
dc.subject.otherHypothesis Testingen_US
dc.subject.otherTeachingen_US
dc.titleTesting a student generated hypothesis using student dataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollowen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMathematicsen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScienceen_US
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Revieweden_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA. e‐mail: rsnation@umich.eduen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA. e‐mail: herle_mcgowan@ncsu.eduen_US
dc.identifier.pmid22163324en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/91094/1/j.1467-9639.2010.00452.x.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1467-9639.2010.00452.xen_US
dc.identifier.sourceTeaching Statisticsen_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceASA. ( 2005a ). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE) college report. http://www.amstat.org/Education/gaise/ (accessed 16 February 2010).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceASA. ( 2005b ). Guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education (GAISE): A pre‐K‐12 curricular framework. http://www.amstat.org/Education/gaise/ (accessed 16 February 2010).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeatty, I.D. ( 2004 ). Transforming student learning with classroom communication systems. Educause Center for Applied Research, Research Bulletin, February 3, Issue 3, http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0508/0508129.pdf (accessed 9 July 2010).en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeatty, I.D., Gerace, W.J., Leonard, W.J., and Dufresne, R.J. ( 2006 ). Designing effective questions for classroom response system technology. American Journal of Physics, 74 ( 1 ), 31 – 39.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeekes, W. ( 2006 ). The “Millionaire” method for encouraging participation. Active Learning in Higher Education, 7 ( 1 ), 25 – 36.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrickman, P. ( 2006 ). The case of the Druid Dracula: A directed “clicker” case study on DNA fingerprinting. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36 ( 2 ), 48 – 53.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaldwell, J.E. ( 2007 ). Clickers in the large classroom: Current research and best‐practice tips. CBE Life Sciences Education, 6 ( 1 ), 9 – 20.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen, Y.F., Liu, C.C., Yu, M.H., Chang, S.B., Lu, Y.C. and Chan, T.W. ( 2005 ). Elementary science classroom learning with wireless response devices implementing active and experimental learning. Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, 96 – 103.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCleary, A.M. ( 2008 ). Using wireless response systems to replicate behavioral research findings in the classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 35 ( 1 ), 42 – 44.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConoley, J., Moore, G., Croom, B. and Flowers, J. ( 2006 ). A toy or a teaching tool? The use of audience‐response systems in the classroom. Journal of the Association for Career and Technical Education, 81 ( 7 ), 46 – 49.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuncan, D. ( 2005 ). Clickers in the Classroom: How to Enhance Science Teaching Using Classroom Response Systems. San Francisco: Pearson.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaidet, P., Hunt, D. and Coverdale, J. ( 2002 ). Learning by doing: Teaching critical appraisal of randomized trials by performing an in‐class randomized trial. Academic Medicine, 77 ( 11 ), 1161 – 1162.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerreid, C.F. ( 2006 ). “Clicker” cases: Introducing case study teaching into large classrooms. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36 ( 2 ), 43 – 47.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazur, E. ( 1997 ). Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferencePenuel, W.R., Boscardin, C.K., Masyn, K. and Crawford, V.M. ( 2007 ). Teaching with student response systems in elementary and secondary education settings: A survey study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55 ( 4 ), 315 – 346.en_US
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZhu, E. ( 2007 ). Teaching with clickers. Center for Research on Learning and Teaching (CRLT) Occasional Papers, No. 22. http://ic.ucsc.edu/technologies/clickers/Zhu_Teaching_w_Clickers_michigan.pdf (accessed 9 July 2010).en_US
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.